Jump to content

GH's Production Values


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Did I say he was attacking me publicly?

Hes attacking MY soap however and I have a right to feel insulted and offended by his comments. Its okay if he doesn't like GH. Not everyone in the world has to. But theres no need for him to attack it and call it crap....

Cuz the truth is that its not crap for the millions of viewers who watch it each and everyday. Viewers like me who know how great a show it is and look forward to it each day.

But if we're going to be rude like that about each and every soap that doesn't please us then I'll definitely keep his comments in mind the next time I see the garbage that ATWT spews out when it comes to Noah and Luke yet is being heralded as "the best couple on daytime"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ryan is a long time GH fan and he has every right to say what he thinks of the show and the direction its going in. This is a public message board, where debate is essential, we encourage more than one point of view. You don't agree with it, fine, but Ryan is a GH fan, who is simply stating his thoughts on the current condition of the show.

What about people who watch out of loyalty and don't find the current condition of the show amusing? Do their opinions not count?

Go ahead, state what you think about ATWT and its storylines. No one is denying you that right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Still doesn't give him the right to call someone elses work crap.

Let him go and make his own soap and when it beats GH in the ratings and is critically acclaimed as the best soap ever or one of the top soaps in existence then he has a right to talk about GH.

As for the last part I never said everyone who watches the show everyday has to like it. However I do think most people who watch everyday do like it.

If you're watching a show and you don't like it it sounds pretty stupid to me...why not do something productive with your time? Or go find something that umm you actually like doing?

You mention loyalty....but if you think somethings crap and you bash it each and every day it doesn't sound like its something you're loyal to...at least to me.

Anyways I'm off to bed. My main point is that I've been watching ATWT for a while and while I may not like some of the stuff thats going on storywise I still don't go around calling ATWT crap or bs or any other derogatory word I can think of out of respect for its viewers....

I"d think others would do the same for other soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well if the shoe fits then I say go for it! GH of right now is a joke to the genre and is certainly not in the same vision as the creators (forgot their names) as well as Wendy Riche and Claire Labine. They all envisioned GH as a family oriented soap that dealt with serious social issues and also had people to root for and was full of loving romances (I may have not liked Sonny/Brenda but millions of others did....I did like Luke/Laura, Stone/Robin, Alan/Monica under Labine) and a sense of humor along with people caring for each other. Right now, GH is just a spin off of either The Sopranos (a truly gifted show) or The Godfather where the mob people rule and are the heroes...years ago, the heroes were the actual crimefighting people who would save others' lives. On Guza's GH, the people of Port Charles worship Sonny and his beloved braindead Ho feeding sidekick Jasbot. The mob has taken over and made it into one majorly gloomy show all headed by a hack EP and a hack head writer. Even JFP said that GH is about the mob...funny because I thought it was about the HOSPITAL! After all, the name is General Hospital, not General Mafia. Nobody has rooting value anymore, the show has been sucked dry by Super Skank Spam McCallgirl, dumbass Barney Fife dufus Lucky, Holier Than Thou Elizabeth, dangerous and dull Sonny and Jasbot....this show centers most, if not, all of its stories around a select group of people and omits most of the cast from great storytelling when those are the characters most people want to see.

Sure many fans tune into GH daily but not all of them are satisfied with what is going on but they hang in there since they feel the show can get better again and it is a habit that is hard to break. Fans stick through their shows through the good and bad....and GH has been bad since The Wicked Witch of the West Jill Farren Phelps invaded and butchered yet another show. Her track record (Santa Barbara, Another World, Guiding Light, One Life to Live, and now General Hospital) speaks for itself and I just hope they keep her far way from my soap, All My Children. AMC has a hack arleady in Julie Hanan Carruthers but I will take her over The Wicked Witch of the West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to the first amendment, he has that right, just like you have the right to not read it or to say you do not agree...it doesn't mean either one of you is right and wrong. It's just your opinions and they don't match.....and again if the shoe fits because I think GH is awful and has been since Phelps started her reign of terror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I rarely reply to you, but...

GH is much more than just about a hospital. Referring to it as such is a simplistic way of describing The Hursley's show. I have always thought GH was primarily about health & sickness in its many forms. Financial (working class Webbers & Eckerts/rich & upscale Quartermaines/rich & treacherous Cassadines), emotional (Carly's revenge against Bobbie/Ric & Sam's adultery), physical, sexual (Steve & Audrey's marriage/Monica & Rick's adulterous affairs), mental (Laura & Lesley's catatonic conditions), spiritual, political, moral (law enforcement-Scorpios/mob-The Smiths/Sonny/Jason/Alcazar)

JFP was very good at Santa Barbara, good at GL, bad at AW, horrible at OLTL, okay at GH.

JHC over JFP? :o JHC does not strike me as the type of person who is a b-buster. TV Executive producers should be b-busters, not roll-overs. Diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I rarely reply to you (I'm still getting over "telephone operators will forever be employed" ::shudder:: ), but...

All of those aspects are nice, however, the focal point was the hospital. Everything and everyone, ideally, should be linked to the hospital. The central characters should be the hospital staff (doctors, nurses, residents, student nurses, med students, orderlys, even maintanence workers), and then other characters (outside of the hospital) should be connected to them. The stories should be centered on the hospital, and then trickle down to its employees and the effects it has on their professional and personal lives and the people in them.

It's backwards, now. Now, it's about the mob, and how that affects Sonny and Jason, and the trickle down effect to the select characters that are somehow connected to them.

It's like naming a show WKRP in Cincinnati, and having the majority of the show take place in a bar somewhere in Boston. Are we watching WKRP or are we watching Cheers? In this case, are we watching General Hospital or the Sopranos?

What goes on in the mob with Sonny and Jason shouldn't dictate what happens at the hospital with Robin and Patrick. What goes on in Carly's hotel/mob loving life shouldn't determine how much story, say, Bobbie gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
That may have been true before, but GH has put the Hospital back in General Hospital over the past year. Look how many hospital staff the show has? Robin, Kelly, Noah, Lainey, Patrick, Epiphany, Dr. Ford, Ms. Sneed, Regina, Leyla, Nadine, Leo, Andy, Liz, Emily, Georgie, Maxie, not to mention Bobbie and Monica (but I know those 2 arent seen). We've had plenty of hospital related storylines centered aound these characters over the past year and a good portion of the show revolved around it. And of course the addition of NS only reinforced that and we have those characters crossed over.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Having Hospital employees is still only part of it. We still have Sonny/Jason and the mob idolized as the good guys on the show, when in reality the mob shouldn't be. As far as those that work in the hospital Dr. Ford, Ms Sneed, Kelly, Noah, Lainey, Regina, Layla, Nadine, Leo, Andy, Georgie and even Emily are barely seen. Patrick and Robin are becoming sparser with each passing week. Yeah its great to have a hospital staff, but the stories have to be there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jonathan Kellerman has written 40 novels centered on the character of Alex Delaware, with the first being When the Bough Breaks from 1985. One of the aspects of the series which I find so appealing is that characters grow, evolve and change as time goes on. They act and react in a believable, human fashion. While each book tells one complete story, certain relationship threads can continue as the series evolves. Occasional references to the past (from previous novels) also make the readers feel like we know the characters intimately; that we are "living" with them through the years. Actor John Rubenstein (of the 1970s' TV series Family) narrates the audiobooks, and he is perfectly cast. I've never read or listened to an Alex Delaware story which I did not enjoy.
    • This was me! I finally got caught up yesterday and even then, I still may wait until Friday to binge these two episodes. I find that I can watch GH in the background because the pacing is so slow but I must be able to devote my full attention to BTG because so much happens.
    • GH 4-29-25 At the Savoy with a packed house BODY SHOTS!!! https://www.instagram.com/p/DJGRyEaJBYm/ This one has legs. 
    • Article discussing the state of daytime in 1971. The 3 networks were competitive for the first time thus leading to the 'daytime wars' of the 70's, with shows cancelled, soaps expanding etc. The high drama of network daytime CBS, reigning champion of the dollar -profitable weekday schedule, faces toughest challenge in 13 years. Although CBS is virtually unchallenged as the ratings leader in nighttime, the picture in daytime, where CBS also leads, is as different as day from night. To begin with, costs of programing are much lower in daytime than in nighttime TV, and the profitability thus potentially higher. For this reason alone, network rivalry in this area is traditionally intense, although not so frequently subject to public view. This year, particularly, the developments in daytime programing are dramatic. It is the first time in 13 years that CBS has been threatened seriously. It continues in the leadership position, but both NBC and ABC are nipping at its heels; in the season to date, CBS is but three tenths of a percentage point ahead of NBC, and but two-thirds of a percentage point in front of ABC. Average ratings for network programing in the daytime periods (Monday - Friday, 10 a.m. -4:30 p.m. EST) this season stand at CBS 7.6, NBC 7.3 and ABC 7.0, giving CBS an edge of 4% above NBC and 9% over ABC. In the similar period of 1970, CBS's lead was more impressive: 8.4 vs. NBC's 6.9 and ABC's 5.9. It is necessary to go back 13 years to find an NBC daytime performance comparable to this year's -and only twice within that period has NBC showed up as well. In the 1958 -59 sea- son, CBS and NBC were in a tie-a 7.7 rating for each -while ABC was a poor third, just starting on its historic "Operation Daybreak" (in which ABC began the so- called scatter plan in daytime, with advertisers buying participations). ABC's rating then: 3.6. NBC again broke through in daytime in the 1961 -62 season: CBS 7.6, NBC 7.1 and ABC 4.1. In the intervening years, daytime television on the weekdays belonged to CBS. It was at perhaps the crest of its leadership in the 1965 -66 season. CBS then had a 4.5 percentage -point advantage over NBC (CBS 10.6, NBC 6.1 and ABC 4.7). CBS officials place the "big turn" in daytime in the 1962 -63 season with the catchy power of the Password game in the lineup. In that season, CBS came up with a three -percentage -point lead over NBC -CBS 9.2, NBC 6.2 and ABC 3.9. From then on it was CBS by a comfortable margin, season after season. ABC's daytime performance has followed the upward curve. While -as CBS officials readily concede -CBS had perhaps nowhere to go but down, ABC could experiment in its scheduling, and hopefully only go up. It did, but not immediately. After a steady climb, ABC's breakthrough occurred in the 1969 -70 season (CBS 9.2, NBC 7.1 and ABC 7.0) with the network gaining ground with its game show scheduling of such vehicles as Let's Make a Deal. Although ABC failed to hold that showing in the 1970 -71 season (CBS 8.9, NBC 7.6 and ABC 6.4), it is now performing at its best daytime level in history. ABC authorities say that network has been building for what might appear to be at least near parity in weekday programing. They cite Let's Make a Deal as having "started things up" with General Hospital and One Life to Live giving additional impetus to the movement. From ABC's point of view, the crucial change in daytime audiences occurred in 1969 when audience shares foretold a "big difference." The real improvement and change in daytime, they say, started in the third quarter of 1971. That followed a repositioning of two daytime staples -ironically Password, CBS's 1962 -63 vintage powerhouse, and Love, American Style. The former series was punched into a new spot in the schedule last spring: Love followed in the summer (the series is still strong in ABC's nighttime lineup). Although ABC executives speak guardedly of daytime audiences more on a level with those of CBS and NBC, the two challenged networks demur. ABC, they note, is nowhere near parity in daytime, although the improvement is admittedly impressive. For one thing, they contend, ABC does not program during the same hours as do NBC and CBS, and ABC carries one hour less than the other two networks in the daytime period. Moreover, they claim the hours that ABC does not program are those with least audience potential. (CBS and NBC start the schedule - excluding Today on NBC and Captain Kangaroo on CBS-at 10 a.m., take a hiatus for a half -hour at 1 p.m., return at 1:30 and program through to 4:30 p.m. ABC starts at 11:30 a.m., does not pause at 1 p.m. but continues through to 4:30.) ABC counters that not only are daytime clearances holding this season, they are actually showing improvement. In numbers, ABC is clearing an average 153 stations live (88.2% coverage) and an average 26 outlets delayed basis (4.4% coverage) for a total 179 stations representing a 92.6% coverage. Last season, clearances were 149 stations live (87.7% coverage), 27 on delays (4.4% ) for a total 176 stations representing a 92.1% coverage. NBC authorities state flatly that their network is in its "strongest daytime position in 10 years -since late 1961." They note how the margin has narrowed between NBC and CBS since last fall; assert NBC has invested money and time in daytime serials, while CBS's "are wearing thin" (the researchers at NBC point to a general lowering of share levels of CBS drama serials in 1971 vs. 1970). ABC's assessment agrees, and also emphasizes the drop in appeal of CBS's soaps, intimating a possible loss in "quality control." CBS, while not denying the declines in its soaps, refuses to accept the implication that the drama serial may be curtailed. (CBS has eight soaps compared with NBC's five and ABC's three). Four of CBS's shows are Procter & Gamble vehicles: As the World Turns, Search for Tomorrow, Guiding Light and Edge of Night. CBS authorities say you can be sure P &G as well as CBS programers are working on plans to strengthen their respective properties. CBS officials contend the drama serial not only is still well up in share (although off from prior years) at the network but continues as the most "flexible" among daytime entries. If a game show starts to plummet, they say, there's not much that can be done to "change" the format. With soaps, a fall -off in viewer interest can be countered by extensive changes in storyline and /or characters; a role can be written in or out of a script almost at will. CBS cites just such a turnaround accomplished with Love is a Many  Splendored Thing. Fred Silverman, then in charge of daytime programing at CBS (and now in charge of the whole ball game), effected a series of changes until "only the title and the music were recognizable." The surgery worked. For years, CBS has been conscious of the adage that change for the sake of change, when the network is on top, entails needless risk. But the numbers have changed now and CBS must contend with the altered picture. "Everybody is ashamed of daytime," one CBS executive admits. Changes will be made. The first quick snip comes Dec. 20 when My Three Sons replaces The Beverly Hillbillies in the 10:30 -11 a.m. period. Hillbillies is one of three shows rated lowest on the CBS daytime schedule -the others are the seemingly tireless Lucy and Gomer Pyle (the latter, at least, considered by CBS officials as a candidate for cancellation.) Snips two, three and onward may be expected to follow in rapid succession.
    • That's me - in a nutshell. But, it's because BTG is so damn good! I also wondered who was watching soccer during the day, mid-week, or even watching soccer at all. However, I know SOOOO many people that never followed soaps that were downright shocked that a new soap premiered in 2025. Why? Because they didn't know that people still watch TV during the day, mid-week, or still watched soaps at all. Many also didn't realize that soaps streamed, too. So, I feel foolish, but I guess I don't have all the answers with regard to the programming of major TV networks. I'm glad they have people that focus on these things, because that is how we got BTG in the first place.
    • Kelly looks so good in today’s episode (taped mid-March). I’ve always maintained Kelly looks fab in blue, and when they keep her hair straight like this. When they curl her hair, I feel it doesn’t suit her beautiful face.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you @BoldKara. I hadn’t realised it’s only a few months away with the current YouTube uploads. I’m happy to wait until then - hopefully they won’t skip the episode this time around. 
    • Am I the only one welcoming the preemptions because I've been mad busy and have to catch up on over a week of episodes? Just saying.
    • Deniece Williams song "Blind Dating" from the album "Let's Hear it for the Boy". Blind Dating is co-written by Michele Val Jean.

      Please register in order to view this content

        disc image:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • No. Agnes Nixon had worked on a number of shows before creating OLTL (and AMC, which she had in her drawer waiting to come to life). AW was only one of them. Many classic soaps have personnel coming across back and forth all over the map, it's not a unique situation. And to my knowledge very few of the head creative teams at AW came to OLTL. If you're thinking of Harding Lemay, he did only a very brief consulting stint in '98 and maybe '99, and clearly had little actual impact on the writing. Paul Rauch was also a different EP at AW than he was at OLTL, GL, Santa Barbara, Y&R, etc. Nor do I recall him bringing many writers with him. Nor did his work at those shows resemble his time with Lemay at AW AFAIC. Frankly '70s Rauch and '80s Rauch seem like night and day. Beyond Rauch, the only two examples of key AW additions I know of would be first when George Reinholt and Jacquie Courtney jumped from AW to OLTL in the '70s. They were debatably the first daytime supercouple (some might cite Penny and Jeff from ATWT), and the show attempted to recreate that with new characters at OLTL to garner ratings. This was not unique to these shows; many soaps attempted the same trick after them. It might've worked but Reinholt's behavior once again drove him to quit and/or be fired. Robin Strasser was hired several years later as Dorian, but not opposite them in any triangle. Reinholt was long gone. JFP would be the other example and the only one who actively tried to model it after AW, bringing over several of her favorite actors from AW and several other shows she'd worked on in 1998-99. She was accused of trying to remake her AW at OLTL, but it was a poor fit because of their being very different. (She tried the same at GH.) I don't think OLTL was ever seen as 'just Another World' even remotely. It simply occasionally had AW stars coming aboard. And in the late '90s, they didn't fit. Jacquie Courtney and George Reinholt's characters fit in much easier, but Reinholt's in particular didn't last and Courtney's became quite different. OLTL and AW were dramatically different shows IMO, which is why JFP forcing actors from it onto the show didn't work or last.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy