Jump to content

Anyone think Lorraine Broderick should return to AMC?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Lorriane Broderick has been off AMC for about 10 years now. She was head writer a few times. She wrote wonderful storylines back in her day. She knows the history of the soap, the characters, and will bring it back to what Pine Valley is about. I would love to see Lorriane return home to Pine Valley, she would be excellent. She wrote the Erica pill addiction, Noah/Julia, the Homophobia storyline, Janet's redemption, The Kinder storyline, Bianca's anorexia and Maria's plane crash. She was wonderful for AMC and would love to see her return. What would you think of Lorriane back to AMC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

JFP? I don't want that pregnancy hating, Frankie-killing, Ellen Parker firing, can't beat Bridget Dobson to the Emmy podium hack anywhere near AMC, it has enough problems. Now as for the question at hand. Why? Have you heard something. I saw a bunch of teens listening to music and Adam acting inept on my screen just now and thought YES. Broderick needs to fix this mess right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lorraine needs to either go to AMC or GL, she's perfect for those two shows.

I miss her and I hear the only reason she hasn't returned to soap writing has to do with constant network interference. Apparently, she hates Frons and the exes at P&G.

JFP just needs to retire already, her only true success story was Santa Barbara. While her first 3 years at GL were gold, but that was due mostly to Nancy Curlee and her writing team, it was JFP who was responsible for many mistakes there in the early 90's. Jill's stints on AW and OLTL were utter disasters, and GH is virtually unrecognizable from what it was 10 years ago, she totally botched the high standard of quality Wendy Riche bought to that show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly don't think Jill is that much responsible for GH's poor production values. Jill totally gave GL and AW a cosmetic makeover, when she helmed both show and that was very much needed at the time. Like her or not, she has a knack for sets and background music.

You should especially compare AW before Jill and after Jill, she totally beautified that show and made it look fresh and up to date. Though her creative vision on that show is another problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With the way Frons micro-manages the ABC soaps, I don't think JFP has much say in terms of spending for sets or storyline content anymore. At least nothing resembling her power trips on SB, GL, AW, and OLTL.

The fact she hasn't left GH probably has to with her not being able to find another job if she does. P&G hates her, NBC only has one soap, and B&B has Bradley.

Should Frons fire her, her only real option ::shutter:: is Y&R. Her friend, Steve Kent, was supervising producer on Santa Barbara for JFP's run there. Now, he's the executive in charge of production for both Y&R and Days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Keep JFP away from my AMC! :angry:

Anyway, back on point, I think Lorraine should return. This shitfest we're watching now is just horrible. I wanted them to really workout (B&E) and thought the first two weeks were great and hoped it was a sign of things to come. But the rest of the summer and what looks to be the fall is just boring.

It's a sad statement when the only thing I'm looking forward to is the Babe Switch next week. That's IT! None of the stories right now have me riveted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but some problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • A great day. Feeling happy and accomplished.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy