Jump to content

OLTL: Debating Ron Carlivati & The Show


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Right now he is doing a fine job! I havn't enjoyed OLTL in SOOOOOOO long until now! :D I love the Marci/Todd/Tommy storyline! I also think that incorporting Lindsey in it is a fine job! I think when he reveled that Lidnsey was the killer I found it surprising!

RuAsRuAnAu, Why is it that you always say negative things about the ABC soaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I find the show delightfully watchable, not perfect, a little run-on, a little riveting, a little melodramatic, a lot soapy, and much more down to earth than it's been in years. In 15 episodes - that's only three weeks - nothing can get done besides wrapping up stories. You can't just put all the bad stories in Llanfair and blow it up, it'd be contrived and the audience would feel cheated. Expanding the Spencer murder mystery into the Tommy saga was a smart move, and slowly developing new stories and cleaning up and improving stories already in progress is a good first move by Carlivati. I swear, it's as if some viewers were expecting the acting, direction and production to change with the new head writer. You aren't going to get a Billy Douglas story. You aren't going to get a gang rape story. The last social issue story (the OPP mystery) proved that nobody on the show knew how to handle a realistic story. Just watch the show, take it for what it is, enjoy it and try to not to think too much. Veronica Mars this ain't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carlivati has been trying to "fix" the show since he became co-HW in early May 2007? When he came on, the show actually got worse. May was beyond terrible; the worst month in OLTL's history in terms of quality.

As did Malone & Griffith is 2003/2004.

I know that no TV series be can fixed overnight. My comment about OLTL & Carlivati's involvement stems from the fact that he has been writing the show for more than FOUR months now. That's enough time to show more than a modicum of improvement. He needs, so he should ask for it. Cascio's the person whip the show into shape.

What about Renee? What about the minimal mentions of Asa (1979-2007)? What about Hank? The other Buchanans? Carlotta?

Who do you want to be in charge of OLTL? Any story ideas?

Any show that produces this much episodes per year if definately a team effort. Carlivati needs to surround himself with intelligent, talented, and passionate writers like Cascio and Culliton. Those who do not fit the mold need to be tossed to the side. It is basically the lead, follow, or get out of the way mantra.

pinevalleylanview Posted Today, 05:00 PM Sarah never would have done what the writers scripted her to do in this kidnapping ordeal.

You're right. She would have been much more active in trying to help her uncle Todd in his hour of need. Being that weak against Hunter? Come on. Remember: Carlivati co-wrote that story so he IS partly to blame.

MichaelGL Posted Today, 06:29 PM OLTL is one of the few soaps these days that I can sit through and watch an entire episode these days. It's doing just fine

Which ones do you watch entirely on a regular basis? GL...

YRBB Posted Today, 06:06 PM ...You REALLY can't judge a new HW in two weeks, though, it really takes some time.

He's been in the top and 2nd top spot for almost FIVE months now. That's nearly 100 OLTL episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First off, NONE of the material that aired over the summer was Carlivati's idea. He couldn't just suddenly stop everything Dena had going. Then he'd be accused of dropping storylines. <_<

Ron said many times in the magazines that his original stories would be airing this fall. All he did this summer was patch Higley's work and try to make it watchable. If you think the show has gotten worse since he's taken over, then I don't know how you judge quality.

Secondly, I know Malone & Griffith wrote horrible stories, but they didn't destroy the show like Higley did. She owns that honor on her own.

As far as your "FOUR months" statement, it isn't HIS material. All he could do was try to wrap up Higley's stories and lay the foundation for his upcoming stories. Ron is doing a good job thus far, and I wouldn't change anything about his writing.

Your response to my comment about the vets makes no sense. Hank hasn't been on the show in a long time. The other Buchanans paid a visit for Asa's funeral. If you're saying that Ron hasn't made an effort to bring back these characters to the show, well you don't know that. The fact that he's trying to bring back old faces, when all Higley did was bring in freakin newbies and shove them down our throats shows he's trying something different. The fact that he managed to get fan faves to return for a few eps shows that he wanted to do a good job. He could have just had people already on the show mourn for Asa (ala GH did when Alan died).

I'm quite happy with who's in charge right now. The only person I want gone is Valentini. His time is up.

Your anti-Ron/pro-Cascio agenda is showing quite brightly if you ask me. I don't see why you're so critical of a man who's barely had time to put his stamp on the show. If 6 months from now OLTL is in the crapper, then fine, the man could be subject to criticism, but jizus morgan, give the guy a chance to either soar or crash and burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven  The Arlene/Ben/Betsy triangle is one I wish I could see for myself as on paper it doesn't tend to excite me but I can see how well-constructed it was. I wish I could see the Rick/Meg relationship too, although I wish they'd had him genuinely fall for Meg after he gets together with Cal. The whole Brooke/Deacon/Bridget story on B&B was horribly damaging to Brooke as a character but it was dramatically very sound because I could completely believe Deacon would fall for messy and vulnerable Brooke after finally settling down with the more docile Bridget.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • According to the head writer list, it seems the show may have started to fall apart while either the Schneiders or Upton were writing.  And when it started to crumble, it crumbled fast.  It was sad to see everything Labine had brought to LOL be disassembled.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy