Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Her management company apparently decided to create a You Tube page with livestreaming of this announcement, complete with Countdown clock!  WTF, are you kidding me?

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4192

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2412

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

If this wasn't being livestreamed (I work on my laptop), I wouldn't even bother.  I admit to still being somewhat curious but I've avoid Social media for most of the day because there is too much speculation and I'm becoming annoyed.

The Countdown Clock has me :lol: though.

  • Administrator
Posted

It's not that big of an issue. She's been taking the substance since 2006, and it was only put on the banned substance list on January 1, 2016.  She made the mistake of not checking her email that provided the new banned list.  This might hurt her a tiny bit but enough to lose her endorsements, or her championships coming into question. 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

 

 

The ban was announced in September 2015, Sharapova said she didn't read the letter.  And three other Russian athletes have also been banned for using the same Meldonium (one just announced earlier today before Maria).  Some people within the tennis world are saying they expect a 3-6 month ban, at the least.

 

 

Just read that Sharapova's lawyer announced that she has been provisionally suspended and she will not be asked for her B sample to be tested.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
  • Members
Posted

She should have checked but I am not sure if the drug she was taking had a generic name to it. Would she have known it was the drug she was taking? 

See thats why you should always read your mail.:P:lol:

2 year suspension to 4 year suspension….

Marin Cilic received 7 months I believe…after it being reduced. I find it odd that Cilic hasn't done squat after his US Open win. 

 

  • Members
Posted

If you're an athlete in the age of WADA, it's your health/life, your name and your career on the line, so you need to make sure that you keep abreast of what's going on, especially if you are on medication.  I'm not fully clear on whether this was fully FDA approved either.  If the letter was sent out in September of last year, there was warning of a looming ban on the horizon.  

 

Someone will have to go back and read the transcript.  I thought she said she read a part of it but didn't look too closely at the full list but didn't read the full letter.  I don't want to be suspicious but quite a lot of Russian athletes have been failing drugs tests as of late (even though Maria spends most of her time in the U.S.) and at least 3 other Russian athletes have failed tests for this same Meldonium.  Weird and confusing.

  • Administrator
Posted (edited)

Oh yeah, for sure, every athlete should be aware of the banned substance list for their sport, especially for someone like Maria, who I believe is the highest paid woman in sports. Also, if you've been taking something for 10 years, you don't automatically think it will be added to the banned list (and if you don't know it's also known as another name), but it's your responsibility to check.  In this case, I think 6 months to a year would be a reasonable suspension.  Imagine if she had won the Aussie Open - it would've been a bigger story than it already is. 

Edited by Toups
  • Members
Posted

She's been injured a lot so maybe the unexpected suspension will let her really heal properly and bring her back to the tour stronger. If Cilic received 7 months then Maria shouldn't receive any worse. I'd say 5 to 6 months is fair….

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy