Jump to content

The Tennis Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4184

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2409

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

The Djokovic family are such pricks! Arrogant SOBs!! They wore 10 shirts....really? What if he had lost? And Novak had 22 already on his jacket? Lord

Please register in order to view this content

The only family member that didn't have a 10 shirt on was Jordie. I feel bad for him. He was the one that was suppose be better than Novak. I see something sinister there. 

All that said Tsitsipas losing was great to see.

Daddy Tsitsipas was p!sssed!!

He was the only one who didn't clap for his son during his speech or when he held up the runners up trophy. He didn't even bother standing.

Stefanos needs to tell his daddy bye bye. At least his mom has learned and didn't show up the whole tournament.

 

Interesting facts. ..  Hope it doesn't happen this year.

 

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Stefanos Is a culero. I can see @DramatistDreamer gasping

Please register in order to view this content

He showed it very early in his career against Medvedev. He egged him on and then when Medvedev challenged him Stefanos cowardly left the courts.

I was a fan of his but he quickly showed his true colors.

I can't stand him or his father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Probably all time lows. I don't see how numbers were even good. Someone said most of the matches this year were dull just plain boring. I agree. The match ups weren't good. 

Tsitsipas hasn't beaten Novak in three years.

Here is a prediction of the men's final ratings.

Only the Australian government can stop Novak Djokovic at the Australian Open, and it took even them several tries. Perhaps Stefanos Tsitsipas can keep Djokovic from his fourth-straight Aussie Open title; he did make him sweat in a French Open final two years ago. Either way, this matchup is for the diehards only; there is no casual fan who will wake up at 3:30 AM ET to watch this. Last year’s Rafael Nadal-Daniil Medvedev final averaged 690,000 viewers. Prediction: 478K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And to add to that era - that little snippet really - you could have put a camera on any one of the girls in that era and you're going to catch something.  You really would.  But - to add on top of it, Hingis' usual bitchy comments that were tossed about....(so I wouldn't say that these girls today couldn't hang with such comments and behavior - I think they probably could, but the world has changed.) - but I remember Hingis' famous bashing of Mauresmo - saying she was playing half of a man.  And a lot of the fans (I was one) -  who disliked Hingis - for the simple fact that all she really had was consistency.  She didn't have a big weapon of any kind.  She had consistency, which was something we saw more of throughout the 70's and 80's as providing a way to win for a lot of girls.  Hey, I'm a Chrissie fan, but I realize she didn't have a weapon really - she had the backhand and mental toughness, and consistency (you could argue her PLACEMENT of serve), but she didn't have a weapon really.  Oddly, Chrissie would serve as Martina's mentor for a couple of years.  But, long post, toss in Hingis's nasty comments from time to time and get out the popcorn.  And she would kind of pass the bitchy torch to Henin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • First, Martin vs Ted. Now Kat vs Ted.    
    • Team Silk Press Sheila!  I hope she topples the mighty Duprees because that family has it coming. The spoilers that were posted last week for today's episode had Ashley/Derek mentioned, but as we saw, they weren't featured at all.  Was that part of the spoiler a mistake, or did the show edit them out.    Nice to see a bit of Vanessa/Doug.. and I'm fascinated by Vanessa's perspective in regards to Dani/Bill's marriage vs Nicole/Ted's marriage. While this was a good episode, it does highlight that the show is lacking non-Dupree related characters.  
    • Cry me a river! lol. Oh, Silk-Press.     Awwww no good night for Dani and Andre.    Uh oh. They are at the house. It's dark and Mona did let everyone off for the night...    
    • I just hate this dress. Bottom picture. 
    • I do wonder if Bill will suffer any consequences from his part in all of this.   Ambyr is such a star. I love it when actors react in the background.    Kat, this ain't about you!   Go 'head, Martin vs Ted.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • "On a shallow note" Martin gets all the booty from his Daddy, Ted is just as stacked as his son, LOL! I had to say it.
    • Lol! If Kat is going to do one thing, it's going to be give shade.   And of course, the Duprees would get into formation and team up. Sadly, I don't think they have anything on Silk Press Sheila.    Poor Nicole.   But loving it. I know I'm invested besides I'm seriously side-eying Vanessa/Doug cuz I want to get to the meat. And I love that every single beat is getting played.    Oooo Nosy Nurse!!!   OOOOHHHH so Silk Press Sheila and Nicole were preggers at the same time. And HA!!! The lawyer WAS Bill!  The acting is superb. Silk Press Sheila even toyed with Martin a little bit.   Ooooomg! Eva revealed.   Wait! Is it food posioning for Vanessa or is she with child?
    • Well, if you add that one caveat, oddly, it disqualifies Renee. Because she is one person who was both the planner (if you will) and also the "evil" revealer. Weird but that is THE difference.  And it's the only difference. But, sure, I think those words make it unique. THE REVEALER CONVINCES HER TARGET TO HOST THE EVENT. Right?  Well, if we nitpick The Revealer used her secret agent to convince their target to do this shindig. Yes. That's it. Because Leslie/Sheila/Sherry/Dana/Leslie/Mom didn't do it by herself. She HAD to have Eva doing her part.  Okay, run with that.  And, why not discuss it here? It's topical.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy