Jump to content

SOD: June19, 2007 Issue


Recommended Posts

  • Members

SOD Headlines

Y&R Cover: Nick's Alive! And There's A New Woman

Pics of Nick, Sharon, Phyllis.

Why DAYS Went Downhill: "I didn't have a choice."

Outrage Over EMMY snubs!

Dustin Hoffman to One Life

SOD Interviews Hogan Sheffer

DAYS' Sheffer on State of the Show- Brief Summary

Sheffer reveals that it was financial reasons why he couldn't write for the big four. "I'be haven't played them much in the last four or five months, for reasons that have more to do with money than anything else. My apologies. I just didn't have a choice." But now Corday Producation and NBC have loosened the purse strings a bit and he is able to tell the stories that he wants to now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

At least he is speaking.

This doesn't explain why his stories were boring with no progression (or just plain bad as is with Steve and Kayla) but at least it is something. I wonder how Corday will act to the contradictions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I think he should have tried to move some of the stories he had(like Shelle), but when you can't do what you want to do when you can't write for who you want to write for. It all comes out a huge mess.

Glad he spoke out, I figured Corday had something to do with it, and I bet he just saw that Hogan's writing for the winter was just fine until the ratings dropped. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The budget issues do not correlate, either, with the influx of characters that were paid for a plenty. Gabby and Duck, Willow's brother, etc. Yes they were cheaper, but they were on a lot and paid for accordingly. He could have featured Marlena in key scenes, John in key scenes and feature them less or not at all (really!!) so that stories seemed more cohesive. Hogan can't blame everything on budget issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know he had to change his plans,but that doesnt give excuses to the mess that happened to the show.basically,Hogan is throwing the blame on Corday who throws the blame on Hogan.I dont really care who'se to blame,I just want a good show.

not all of the writing decision's can be blamed on the money Issue.I guess Hogan isnt what everyone,myself inc. , Made and Hoped him to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Budget issues, my ass! If the budget was so bad, why did they bring on even a single new character? Why did they bring on Gabby and Duck? Jed? Connor? Nu-Stephanie? Nu-original-Phil? Judi Evans as Adrienne?

Corday and Hogan seem to be telling two different stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think we all can tell something is wrong here, due to the fact Corday said it was a decision on both parts yet Hogan says it was the budget. Who knows, because Corday is known for lying yet I thought there wasn't a budget problem.

Does it even matter anymore?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sure airing all five newbies in one episode is cheaper than an episode with Dee. Or very close. I trust Hogan more than Corday, however. Maybe the budget isn't that bad, but Corday was saving money or not giving any slack to Hogan and wanted to see if Hogan could write a decent show without the Fab 4.

Jed and Connor are terrible examples, though, since both were recurring, cheap, and hardly aired (Connor played more than some background extras). Duck was barely on, and Joy Bisco was on the show for one story arc, which always happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah.

I guess it's the "budget" that's making Hogan write Kate, Lucas and Billie off the show.

On this one, I don't buy Hogan's story. He's been totally 100% SILENT up until very recently,

which makes me suspect that there was a moment where his job was on the line a few weeks

back. That's why Esentsen/Brown were brought in as Editors.

If you notice how Marlena's penthouse was sold and how the BIG FOUR are now on the show,

but without any real character devel. like Nick and Chelsea are given, then you will see that Hogan

plain doesn't enjoy writing for the BIG FOUR.

Nick is Hogan's boy. That's his fave character, and over the next five months, he's going to break

up Nick and Chelsea to focus squarely on building Nick into a character study by himself.

Jett and Jeremy have also been brought on with major summer storylines and they're NOBODYS!

I'm not buying Hogan on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm glad that they've brought Dee/Drake/Kristian/Peter to the frontburner (even if he doesn't write them with the same individual characterizastions at he does Nick/Chelsea) and that they've brought Joe Mascolo/Renee Jones/etc. back to the show, but if they have to get rid of some people in the fall to even out the budget, I'd much prefer letting go of several newbies before they even think of touching Lauren Koslow/Kate. In fact, I prefer Koslow to Renee Jones, so if it came right down to it, give Jones the axe again! They just need to leave my Kate alone, damn it! LoL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Why didn't Steve respect Monica and Jeff's decision?  I get he's Jeff's father, and that's how it came out, but I don't like the ethics of the story.
    • Question: Jon-Michael Reed's review of 1977 is up in the retro soap section.  It includes a fleeting reference to comedic scenes between Jeanne Cooper and Julianna McCarthy regarding “Kay's would-be beau, Ralph the Plumber”.  Could someone please fill me in will more details? I forgot that Kay and Liz were friendly before Jill stole Kay's husband.  And the thought of Liz playing a comedic scene blows my mind, because I only recall her being dour both in demeanor and wardrobe.  
    • I said on Twitter on Friday when Leslie mentioned Chicago that perhaps she might be related to one of Anita's bandmates. Since we hardly know anything about Leslie's childhood background. In addition, Leslie said she grew up listening to The Articulettes….
    • There was a scene in the past week or two with Leslie looking at some papers and mementos, which included an invitation or souvenir from Alan's memorial service or funeral -- it was dated as November 2024. Me just guessing but it seems to me that Martin's nightmares about the accident are from something longer ago than November.
    • ah thanks! do you know who the third one was in the blonde? the fifth one i know ive seen before in the brown wig but i forgot, and then ive never seen the psychic one before lol
    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy