Jump to content

ATWT: Luke and Noah spoilers from TVGuide


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

New Article from latest SID June 12 issue:

Soap's Controversial New Love Story!

"It's going to be a different summer with no slashers killing people or people being pushed down stairs," says Van Hansis (Luke) of his latest storyline. " I think it's going to be more of a upbeat summer, where the drama comes out of emotions rather than actions. " But is daytime ready for it's first gay male love story?

The In Depth Story: With the introduction of Jake Silbermann as Noah Mayer on Friday, June 1, Luke will finally get his first boyfriend! The daytime newcomer says that when he auditioned for the role, he was told that he would be the love interest of another male character, and had no problem whatsoever with it." Silbermann admits. " It's acting, and it's a really interesting character. Luke had a great storyline last Summer, and I think this one is going to be just as interesting. I'm thrilled about it." Although the network's Standards and Practices will likely keep Luke and Noah's love story from being as physical as most soap romances, Silbermann says he's willing to turn up the heat. "Whatever is appropriate," the actor muses. " Not a problem. I want to make the character as full-bodied and real as I possibly can."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have been meaning to comment on this and just say ICAM with your whole post but especially the bolded part. I have thought that for a while that the only reason people want to see Luke on screen is because he is gay. Though I don't mind this storyline with Noah at all. I will be curious as to how it will turn out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To a degree some fans do turn in for just that reason, but then there are fans like me and several others that have been watching way before Luke, so it really is not true in that case. And I don't know about alot of other Luke fans but I would love a storyline with him that had nothing to do with him being Gay, the show had 9 months to do something with him that did not involve him being Gay and they choose not to, so yes most fans what to see Luke, because he has been missing for almost a year, and if the show is only going to show the Gay side of Luke then I guess that is why we will tune into watch him for. Not our choice that is the shows choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think people want to see Luke just because he is gay. Sure some do, but not all of us. I've been watching the show for a long time and have "known" Luke since he was born. I've watched him grow up and he's part of an important family in Oakdale. He's also played by a talented actor. I care about the character and want to see him more. The show chose to make him gay so I want to see that played out. I don't want to see his only story being about him being gay. He should be seen as much as any character in Oakdale. He happens to be gay but that isn't all that he is. They should explore all facets of his character. Just because he's gay doesn't mean he shouldn't be seen just as much as any of the other "teens."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Something that bugs the hell out of me is how people opened their arms and embraced the character of Noah even when he was nothing more than an audition script floating around the internet. The character hasn't even debut yet on the show, but people are already listing him as one of their favorites, someone they want to see everyday, etc.

I want to see this story just like anybody else does, but a new character is a new character to me, no matter who it is. I'm not warming up to the actor or the character until I actually see him on the screen.

People did the exact same thing back when AMC announced that Mimi would be coming back when a new man, Garrett Williams. I'll never forget actually reading a post, maybe a week or so before they showed up on screen, where a person here on SON said that they "want to see people who are good, rootable characters, like [insert list of AMC characters] and Garrett." It made absolutely no sense to me why a character who had absolutely no history and hadn't even debut on the show yet would be considered "good, rootable."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was something that bugged me as well. I remember when Jake Silberman when the GLAAD awards with Van Hansis that people started getting excited then becuase that was when we found out Luke was getting a boyfriend. I mean people already had "Nuke" banners saying they would be the hottest couple in Oakdale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right. But how can Luke and Noah as a couple even have fans yet if they've never had a scene together, ever. There is quite a possibility that the chemistry sucks between Van and Jake. Or, *gasp*, Jake might not be that great of an actor.

I'm not saying that people shouldn't be exicted about it, because I mean, I'm excited about it myself and I can't wait for Noah to debut and for Noah and Luke to start inching towards each other. But until then, I'm not gonna act as if they are already the best damn thing on the show when I have absolutely nothing to back that up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My thoughts exacly AMS. These same people are even already encourging the rest of their group to vote for Luke and Noah in the SID/SOD polls for hottest couple thing thats in there. I mean more power to them and they have a right to do that but like you said its ridiculous to do that when you havn't even seen them together on screen yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If someone wants to enjoy the show and look forward to something, who the hell cares? Why not encourage them instead of tearing them down. All people do is bitch so true fans should be happy that a segment of fans, any segment, is happy about something.

Please. There are a bunch of bigoted fools out there already campaigning AGAINST storyless Luke. I have seen Paul/Emily boards, Gwen/Will boards, Dusty/Lucy boards and all kinds of other things started when a couple was just announced or after one scene together. SID lists Jade/Will as a hot couple to vote for. They are NOT a couple. If anyone has a problem with people being excited about Nuke, there's a bias there because this happens with every damned couple.

GO NUKE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy