Jump to content

April 30 - May 4, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

But that's the thing. People's ideas of what "good ratings" are will have to change because that is quite possibly what is happening. Ratings don't count all the different ways people watch television. The norm now looks to be around a 2.3 or 2.4 and as ridiculous as it sounds, that might have to be considered "good" for an audience who watches the shows as they air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. Also, Rick brings up an interesting point. Primetime ratings are down as well. I know one of the AI producers mentioned how he beleives moving up daylight savings time hurt ratings for Idol because if you get some nice weather you will see outdoor activities become the norm much faster. I have to wonder if that is playing a role in the ratings for everyone. There have been so many negatives across the board for both daytime and primetime. Hell, even Idol lost viewers in March after having huge numbers it's first 2 months. There is usually a drop off after the early rounds but when you see alot of other primetime shows going down too it makes you wonder. I know there were alot of hiatuses but still.

Ratings for all of TV are dropping and it makes you wonder if the networks have to start changing their views on what is a good rating for their particular shows. They may be thinking much higher then they should be thinking as there are so many choices out there for people to watch and you also have to consider the weather and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ratings aren't the bottom line. The bottom line is all that counts. In the case of the Soapnet soaps, they have network airings and Soapnet airings so multiple chances at revenue. Not sure how that works for Days since NBC has nothing to do with Soapnet but definitely helps the ABC soaps the most. CBS does a lot of online stuff with commercials added in and I'm sure the other nets do too. More and more the shows have to come up with as many revenue streams as possible. The network airing and these ratings aren't the only ways to make money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I noticed that when NBC.com aired behind the scenes stuff for the DAYS Green wedding, they often showed a 30 second commercial before the actual clip. I'm not sure how much revenue that pulls in but it's an alternative source nonetheless. Soaps need to tap into the online market whenever possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm glad you brought that up. I've been thinking about what the "norm" is supposed to be. I mean how many viewers were watching ATWT or Y&R in 2000? 2003? 2005? I'd really appreciate it if someone has that information or could direct me to a place that has it. Although it might kill certain people I think 2.3-2.5 is probably going to be average and if we go by that ATWT is at least doing okay in my book. That by no means is perfect but hey its not Passions...

ATWT can definitely do better and I expect them to in the upcoming months due to a variety of factors. I don't think Gwen/Will is the problem. Nor do I think vets are the solution.

Bottom line is sustainability to me. Can networks continue to air soaps in a way thats both profitable to them and producing high quality entertainment for the fans without getting rid of classic things that make each soap special? Such as the furor over the John and Marlena set thats going on over in that other thread...is that a sign that soap needs to be let go? Or are people overreacting? I personally am torn. On one hand I want to say, "its just a set". But some sets do hold significance. Like Fairwinds and The Farm on ATWT. I'm also very fond of Java and Al's for some strange reason...lol. Last but not least I'd love a storyline to involve Metro again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For most networks ratings are the bottom line. Adveristers pay money based on ratings and the SoapNet airings are a complete seperate thing as our the online promotions. Since I'm betting advertisers pay far less online and a lot of time one product hosts an airing or whatever it may be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy