Jump to content

SoapNet: More Disturbing News From The Internet


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Found this posted at: http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc...R%3E%20%3CBR%3E

The lady did not post the original source. But this fits in with what Frons was saying in his interview. This is ridiculous. Shows like Jerry Springer, Love Boat, etc. have other places to be shown. This is stupid.

I do love the sounds of Dark Shadows & Peyton Place, but I hate we are losing Another World for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This has good aspects and bad aspects.

I would love to see reruns of the golden age of "The Jerry Springer Show" (the late 90s), but that DOES NOT belong a network celebrating passion and romance. Are they [!@#$%^&*] insane?

On the other hand, "Dark Shadows" and "Peyton Place" are shows that deserve to be on television. Same with "The Love Boat," which was similar to the former SOAPnet show "Hotel" anyway.

Why do these channels feel the need to change formats?! Why can't their owners just cough up the cash to make a whole new network? Now that I think about that, I do remember the constant rumors of SOAPnet creating a second channel. Could this simply be in preparations for that?

Or this could all be a bunch of made up crap...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I don't get is if you want Passions and Drama, why get rid of AW? Um it has tons of Passion and Drama. There's Ryan and Vicky, the Frankie/Cass/Kathleen triangle, and the stuff with Paulina and Jake that's coming up and so and so on. That is why this sounds like crap. This sounds like someone who wants to see those shows back on TV made up and wants to get SN watchers further riled up than they already are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes I agree this must be false. For one, if they are getting rid of RH and AW, I highly doubt they would get two soaps that are even older. I don't expect them to be adding any more classic soaps are this rate. I expect in a few years we'll be getting Ugly Betty, Brothers and Sisters, Gilmore Girls, Felicity, etc.

Plus PDN sounds like that religious channel CBN and certainly doesn't have a ring to it. It would just cheapen the brand, but really with Frons nothing surprises me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't see Ugly Betty and Brothers and Sisters on Soapnet. They will go to Lifetime to be with GA and DH. Gilmore Girls seems quite comfortable on ABC family.

ETA: In fact, I bet we hear sometime towards the end of the year that UB and B&S will start airing on Lifetime. It was halfway through DH and GA's second seasons that it was announced that their off network rights went to Lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well it will definitely be between SOAPnet and Lifetime for the repeats. They would've had Desperate Housewives and Grey's Anatomy if they had the money. I don't think UB and B&S will cost as much because they had less viewers. SOAPnet will have more of a shot.

But whatever recent soap it is, thats what we can expect, not daytime classics. But it all depends on how The OC/OTH do. Lets keep our fingers crossed it flops and viewers get sick of watching the same cycle of episodes every four months, multiple times a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

UB and B&S may have less viewers but with their casts and who runs them, I can't see them agreeing to air their re-runs on Soapnet. I know that Soapnet is running a B&S recap show next weekend but them airing re-runs of a show that stars Sally Field and Callista Flockhart? I don't think so. Not to mention Lifetime reaches way more homes. It has been part of basic cable for years and years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes and SOAPnet has been growing every year. They also mentioned having great ratings for the few episodes of Ugly Betty they have aired. They may not get the shows in the end, but I can assure you that they will absolutely be a frontrunner when it comes to picking these shows up.

Soaps don't syndicate well so it's only going to be between Lifetime, Oxygen and SOAPnet for all of these soapy new shows. And if The OC/OTH is a success them SOAPnet will continue growing and growing and this is clearly the direction they want to go i n.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If SoapNet is still in the digital only tier those shows will want a station that has more chance of an audience (and would pay a lot more.) I'd suspect ABC Family may be an option as would TNT, USA and a few others.

Now whether or not they'd get the money they would like is another matter. Audiences are going down across the board. The industry is suffering. I think things will be changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. We should absolutely move on from John/Drake's 40 year legacy on the show to see what Leo is going to do tomorrow.  Lol.  This can't be a serious post.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sydney Mikayla (formerly Trina Robinson on GH) graduating from UCLA, June 2025 https://www.instagram.com/p/DKh92usSow8/ officialsydneymikayla In 8 days, I’ll walk across the stage at the #1 public university in the country — @ucla What a journey.

      Please register in order to view this content

      I came in with a dream and left with a purpose. From lecture halls to rehearsals, community work to creative sets, every moment shaped me. I’m so proud of the stories I’ve told here — and the ones still unfolding. Grateful to everyone who poured into me, supported me, challenged me, and believed in me. Fours up and peace out! #UCLA #ClassOf2025 #BlackBruinExcellence #YearbookVideo @jordanward              
    • The actor who plays Martin has been teasing that nobody has guessed Martin's secret. I love that for things like that and the June story we have no idea. I feel like if we didn't have the day ahead feeds Anita's reveal would've been shocking as well. I love that they aren't going the obvious route with these stories. 
    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy