February 17, 200719 yr Member Oh, boo hoo. It's not like it's the first time she's made a bad movie. JSF, you amuse me so much, LoL.
February 18, 200719 yr Member Its about time that ego of hers was shattered on some level. JSF, you seem like a prude the way you describe how a "work environment" must be. Who cares if people booed, there is nothing wrong with booing a terrible mockery of a movie. Not even an ounce of unprofessionalism(if thats even a word) if you ask me.
February 18, 200719 yr Member Its about time that ego of hers was shattered on some level. JSF, you seem like a prude the way you describe how a "work environment" must be. Who cares if people booed, there is nothing wrong with booing a terrible mockery of a movie. Not even an ounce of unprofessionalism(if thats even a word) if you ask me. Please, jLo is a princess, a good, sweet Catholic woman who gave SO MUCH OF HERSELF for this film. Is it not too much to ask that everyone respect the fact that art is SUBJECTIVE? For that reason, write what you want about the film but don't boo at the event like your opinion is gospel. After all, who wants to be the reason a PRINCESS CRIES?!!
February 18, 200719 yr Member I obviously wasn't there, but if I were to ever be at a movie showing like that its my right to boo or not. Secondly, just by me booing doesn't mean I feel my opinion is the gospel and or superior; its just simply my opinion. Have you actually met J-Lo?
February 18, 200719 yr Member I obviously wasn't there, but if I were to ever be at a movie showing like that its my right to boo or not. Secondly, just by me booing doesn't mean I feel my opinion is the gospel and or superior; its just simply my opinion. Have you actually met J-Lo? Well, you're right there. I guess I just don't believe that booing is the civilized thing to do. And I don't think it is. It's probably a difference in breeding. I have never met jLo but I feel sorry that she must have deal with such negative, hateful, untrue press. Take that "South Park" episode for instance (anyone who watches instantly knows). It's just not fair. She's NOT that big of a [!@#$%^&*]. They only treat her that way because they want to capitalize on the STEREOTYPE of a hot Latin temper.
February 18, 200719 yr Member I am one of the few who defends J-Lo. I think she has a great voice, looks hot, can obviously dance, and can actually act as well. It's probably true though that she has an ego the size of John Holmes package.
February 18, 200719 yr Member I am one of the few who defends J-Lo. I think she has a great voice, looks hot, can obviously dance, and can actually act as well. It's probably true though that she has an ego the size of John Holmes package. Until the exposing YouTube video makes its rounds, I'll never believe she's even A TENTH of how bad people says she is.
February 18, 200719 yr Member Please, jLo is a princess, a good, sweet Catholic woman who gave SO MUCH OF HERSELF for this film. Is it not too much to ask that everyone respect the fact that art is SUBJECTIVE? For that reason, write what you want about the film but don't boo at the event like your opinion is gospel. After all, who wants to be the reason a PRINCESS CRIES?!! It's posts like this for which SON really needs a vomit smiley. All movies and performances are not automatically going to be praised. It's a fact of life that not everyone will like your work. Should they have booed her? No, but J.Lo and other actors like her have to realize there are some who won't put them on pedastals and have nothing but good things to say. Hollywood could use a good dose of humbleness every once in a while.
February 18, 200719 yr Member It's posts like this for which SON really needs a vomit smiley. All movies and performances are not automatically going to be praised. It's a fact of life that not everyone will like your work. Should they have booed her? No, but J.Lo and other actors like her have to realize there are some who won't put them on pedastals and have nothing but good things to say. Hollywood could use a good dose of humbleness every once in a while. I'm convinced that SON DOES have a vomit icon and, for whatever reason, the mods chose to BAN that emoticon -- or hide it. I believe I have convincing evidence of this: for instance, SON NEVER promotes the "crush" or "I have the hots" emoticon, dubbed "wub," but watch this: OH YES, THAT'S RIGHT!! it's there!!! i'VE BEATEN THE SYSTEM, BABY!!
February 18, 200719 yr Member Please, jLo is a princess, a good, sweet Catholic woman who gave SO MUCH OF HERSELF for this film. Is it not too much to ask that everyone respect the fact that art is SUBJECTIVE? For that reason, write what you want about the film but don't boo at the event like your opinion is gospel. After all, who wants to be the reason a PRINCESS CRIES?!! No offense, but what are you smokin'?
February 18, 200719 yr Member Please, jLo is a princess, a good, sweet Catholic woman who gave SO MUCH OF HERSELF for this film. Is it not too much to ask that everyone respect the fact that art is SUBJECTIVE? For that reason, write what you want about the film but don't boo at the event like your opinion is gospel. After all, who wants to be the reason a PRINCESS CRIES?!! She won't be Catholic much longer. She's taking Scientology class. J Lo also isn't that sweet ( she was in cahoots with Tommy Matolla to ruin Mariah's career which is completely unforgiveable) . The good Catholic also practices Voodoo- just ask ex #1. Regardless, they booed because the Mexican people didn't like the fact that they made it into a thriller movie because all those Mexican girls died. Her looks are slipping. I can't say that I feel bad for her humiliation. It's actually quite amusing. Edited February 18, 200719 yr by Q Steph
February 18, 200719 yr Member OOh, time to DISH! What's this about jLo trying to snuff out MiMi's career? But about Scientology-- I disagree. She's already gone on the record saying her papa practices Scientology but she doesn't and is a proud Catholic.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.