Jump to content

AMC: Wednesday


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

With the new co-headwriter at One Life, someone picked from the existing staff, I wish Frons would do the same for AMC and appoint Amanda Beall as co-headwriter. Actually anyone would be fine: Addie Walsh (who suggested the transgender story), Michelle Patrick (probably wouldn't happen as she's black and this is ABC), Stephen Demorest (proven at many shows he's a good writer).....don't know much about Chip Hayes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of my MANY problems with Beall -- and it showed itself in the Valentine's day episode -- is that her writing, especially her dialog, is too... for the lack of a better word... manufactured. The cute little titles at the beginning of each act, like the first one: "I've got you, I'm here," or whatever it was, epitomized that. Self-impressed nonsense like that bleeds into her dialog. She'll come up with a phrase and beat it into the ground. "Hate on" or "Shut me down" are things that make me want to rip each and every single one of my hairs out of my forearm.

She's pretty much the person responsible for the criticism AMC's been getting in regard to its snappy, snazzy, snippity snap, heavily accentuated, majorly punctuated razor sharp wit that makes your ears bleed dialog. It's like, ENOUGH ALREADY! Quit trying to be cute, quit trying to be funny, QUIT TRYING TO WRITE CATCH PHRASES, and just write a natural conversation, argument, whatever, between two characters.

If I had to bump up somebody on staff, it would be Demorest or Patrick. They both have vast experience on other networks and shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LMAo why does it matter if it's legal? Jonathon murdered 3 people and didn't do a lick of jail time. We have a walking fetus on this show. Etc. MMT can say and do whatever she wants.

That said, it's your money, as long as your Will is made in the proper legal fashion, then you can leave it to pets if you choose. It would probably end up being more that the money was made avaible to the person who was taking care of the cats (with limitations, and even checks to make sure that the money was being spent for the cats well being and care) but yeah, it's possible. So the cats dont really "get" the money, but it's not money that can be spent elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well ITA that the dialogue on AMC is appalling for the reasons you mentioned. It's more noticeable if you watch other soaps where it sounds like people are actually having real conversations and not trying so hard to be cute and/or clever and on a moment's notice too. I also dislike how several characters use the same words or phrase to describe something like "stones" for balls, "You're my home" or "I'm home" for couples in love, etc. The snippy snazzy dialogue (and I know exactly what you mean) is horrendous even though it did get a little better once Greenlee left, as she was one of the biggest offenders, although apparently there won't be that reprieve for much longer. IMO, several of the scriptwriters in addition to MMT and JHC need to be fired for the show to have some real improvement. BTW, I read the transcript of the Valentine's show and was not impressed with most of the dialogue (I liked Jamie talking about his feeling for Babe and JR's talk with Stuart was okay but could have been better). It was the actor's and the sentiment and the remembering of loved ones lost that made the show touching - not the dialogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the overused catch-phrase words of Amanda Beall... "you get me." It feels so good to know that someone out there watching/listening to this show hears exactly what I mean.

I was about to vomit on Valentine's day with the contrived Beall catchphrases of "Always, Only You." Who SAYS that? "I want to fix your heart, and never let it break again," equals a heavy "oh puh-leeze!" from me. It was like everybody had the vocabulary of a Hallmark card, whether it was in their character or not.

I had to laugh when you brought up Greenlee, because you're soooo right. The conversations between Greenlee and Kendall were like listening to a freaking Ella Fitzgerald/Sarah Vaughn Jazz Scat Competition. All of their syncopated rhythmns and their ba-dum bum CHING! With a scoobie doo wop zowie, and a rum pa-dum BING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think all the suits are fit too tight, except for Jon Lindstrom's. DC lawyers/doctors are not all LA fashion elites. Yes, maybe Tomas would have a more modern cut to his suit, but an established guy like Bill wouldn't go around looking like that lonely button on his jacket was ready to explode constantly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy