Jump to content

DAYS: Looks like the soap might be in trouble.


Recommended Posts

  • Members

DAYS is really enjoyable now though.

They have a young group that can act and all of the storylines are VERY enjoyable. Day to day episodes are worth the watch. BUT, if any single storyline takes the show over (whether it be with teens, adults or whatever), it will be over due. It sucks that the show finally has a good writer who will probably have a good story but will be over dosed with people that not many may want to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's it exactly. And they've (NBC) tried owning their own show and it didn't work (for THEM). I predict Hogan will quit much like Malone did during his second stint at OLTL.

I've held off talking about DAYS so much because I'm so [!@#$%^&*] angry about it, but this is the [!@#$%^&*] cherry on top.

The pressure from NBC will be to force the ratings down, just like what they did with AW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you are saying, and I agree on a lot of levels. I wouldn't mind seeing Marlena and John happy and in love, and supporting as parents for Belle, and Sami; for Bo and Hope to be happy and in love, and be supporting as parents for Shawn and Chelsea. Ultimately, bringing back Steve and Kayla was a mistake I think; as much as I love them. I believe NBC will cancel the show, but that it will be moved elsewhere. The show needs to plan for the future, and it falls on Hogan now to create memorable new characters, if it's true the budget isn't there for the more expensive performers. Something tells me, much like new actors, vets like Suzanne Rogers, Peggy Mckay, and James Reynolds, and reacurring actors like Tanya Boyd, and Bill and Susan Hayes, aren't being paid that much. Use them in story; I would love to see lots of Doug, Julie, Maggie, Abe, and Celeste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Creating new characters for a show that may not go anywhere past 2009 is pointless. Yes you can build some sort of a future but the next generation or future should NOT be foundation of the show AT ALL. You might as well change the title of the show or cancel it and create a spin off. Because, in all practicality that is what it will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I think this debate is really useless. I mean, if there aren´t enough of money to pay the vets, there simply aren´t enough money to pay them and that´s it. We can speculate and argue how wonderfull it would be if they were on frontburner or viceversa, but it will not change anything. Corday cannot fire everybody except them, because he has 5x40 mins of show weekly he has to fill with stories. And Sheffer isn´t able to tell stories with characters Corday can afford to appear only few times per month.

DAYS isn´t first nor last soap which is forced to bacburnered its major characters for budget reasons. We will see what happens. But if Corday really wants try to sell the show elsewhere in 2009, he will need to prove the show is still viable. Nobody is going to be interest in a soap museum with all major character over fifty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, that's my whole point, Phoe, It seems like, despite what others say, AMC is making it work because they have fewer vets now than ever, and even with an average rating, I'm guessing the small salaries for everyone except for Susan's MEGA bucks make them not NEED the huge ratings that "Days" does, if that makes any sense. Again, it's pure speculation. But if the ratings were "fine" now, profit-wise, if three or four vets were bumped to recurring, they may be in the clear.

Edit: This is all PURE speculation on my part, just trying to make sense of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

It was good while it lasted, and now I'll just enjoy the writing for the characters I DO get to see.

I've already ranted and raved about how I feel towards NBC in regards to all of this.

Corday can't fire the whole frickin' cast and leave just Bo, Hope, John and Marlena. There would be no soap.

Eh, whatever. The whole thing sucks ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like you said it is useless, we can go back and fourth and you're right. But I'm not talking about those people alone. DAYS is an ensemble just like any other show. I don't see why John, Marlena, Bo, Hope and Steve and Kayla are the ones people are picking on so much. They have given this show a lot of its life, some of them almost 20 years. At one point it is time to go, of course. No one is saying the show should become a museum of characters over 50, I think that's pretty silly. But no characters should take over this show and definitely not new ones. Building a future generation for a future that may not exist is dumb. Just balance it out, that is all I am saying. I'm not saying the vets should be on all the time. I'm not saying the teens or younger crew shouldn't be on at all. There needs to be balance. And characters shouldn't become instantly front burner either. It's not going to send the show off any better than it is now. And since they know the show is dying in 2009 what is the big deal anyways? They should try and send it off respecting both old and new viewers of the show. It's a hard concept, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, based on number of appearances I´m pretty sure SN and MBE paychecks are much thinner than would be corresponding with their veteran/soap megastars status. We will see what happens with B/H now, when their contract is almost over. I wouldn´t be surprised if they are both demoted to recurring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy