Jump to content

October 30 - November 3, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Lead-ins are often very important in ratings, because ratings for one soap easily affect others around it on the same network. That's why B&B gets the ratings it does, and is one of the few "newer" (i.e. last 25 years) soaps to have endured and had decent ratings from the start.

The fact that AMC and OLTL come before GH may explain why GH hasn't had the ratings it has hoped right now. The collapse of ABC Daytime right now is reminiscent of how NBC Daytime collapsed in 1980- that year was really bad for Days, and that pulled AW down as well.

Just the same, Guiding Light's position suddenly looks better in comparison to a year ago not through any ratings rise, but because those above it took a dive. Again it seems like history repeating itself- The Edge of Night had fallen to rock-bottom by 1980 after several years of declining ratings (which would probably have meant cancellation soon after), but the collapse at NBC Daytime made its position in the ratings chart look better for a couple of years at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I know you don't like my input on the show/ratings. I know that the show has some improvements that I do acknowledge. But Beth Milstein used some show history and added some really sweet moments between couples that I really liked. Her style is much more suited to Days than Sheffer's.

The storylines are boring, plain and simple. Yes, they have movement, but where to? And before you start saying that just reading the EE and deciding whether to watch the show or not, is something I don't do. I have very reliable sources from ladies who watch the day before Canadian feed that write up the show and give a very unbiased and quality write-up, complete with clips. Their account is invaluable to me, plus occasionally I will actually tune into the show just for a look-see.

I'm not dismissing Hogan Sheffer, but up until now I don't have any excitement about the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do agree that there are too many new characters. Don't get me wrong I do like to see some new blood, but why not cut the cast and write a quality show? The veterans do deserve good stories because they are the backbone of Days.

I just want a good balance of actors, with good storytelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

New characters? There are two new charactered added by Hogan (Willow and Nick) one of which is connected to a core family. There is another new character on the way too that is tied to a core family (Benji). EJ is not really new anymore and wasn't even Hogan's so how is he newbie happy? The only sort of new character with lots of airtime is EJ. That point is ridiculous.

Days is giving quality storytelling and I do agree it can be more exciting then it is but to say Beth Milstein could do a better job just because she gave you special moments between couples is ridiculous. Hogan has given many good J&M moments so far along with Steve/Kayla. Bope have had a few too. I don't recall that many under Beth. In fact, Bope weren't even as close reconcilation under Beth as they are now under Hogan. Same with Steve/Kayla. J&M were barely on so what close moments are you talking about? LUMI had a few moments but that is it. Yet another point Daysgal with no basis.

I am not trying to be harsh but it is clear you have been against Hogan from the beginning and probably are one of those upset that some of the couples aren't together yet. I understand King's point but your's I can't see. We will have to agree to disagree. Accuse the show of being boring-there is evidence there but the rest is not true and I know from watching the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can't we save the Hogan Sheffer/Beth Milstein debate for another thread? The show is still in transition- and a lot of things are in the "set up" stage right now- let Hogan's stories play out further & see what you think. HS fans & Days fans have to understand that the show he is inheriting is in a far worse state than ATWT was at the time. He's still writing the show out of JER's mess & making it his own. Things are very character-oriented right now, which is something we have not been getting. It's very smart to re-establish the charaters and their personalities before putting them into big stories. Give him a chance.

But back on topic- this week belongs to 'GL' and I think we should let them have their time in the "Light." Many of us have been waiting for them to top 'AMC' & 'OLTL' and it's happened- plus they've hit a rating that they haven't hit all year. Both are good signs for the show, especially since it airs in an AM timeslot in much of the country. That's the big news this week IMO. Let's not take away from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not really. Not when two are tied to core families and not when one of them (Willow) is barely on.

juniorz1 is right. Hogan has a mess to deal with whether he had interim people ahead of him or not. The show is still in transition and while it will get more exciting it will be in transition for years to get rid of some of the mess of previous writers. This week does belong to GL and somehow we always end up in a Days debate here so I will just bow out of this and say good job GL!!! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see your point, Phoenix.

There comes a time, however, when you (not you you, like you as in me/you/everyone) need to stop being an eternal optimist/keeping the faith and be more objective. And want more from the show. We were promised an exciting November, God damn it, and I WANT IT! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
:lol: I am always optimistic but I am objective as well and I happen to think November is exciting and will only get better. It's the way I feel so I am not going to change the way I see things. I know things will get better because I know what is to come and I am already enjoying the show. If I enjoy it, I enjoy it. It's not perfect but it is worlds better and I will take the show we are getting now anyday over what we getting before. It is all a matter of opinion. Some like it right now, some don't. You, I, and others may never agree on the state of the show. It all depends on tastes basically. I only spoke put because there was a mention of taking Beth over Hogan and that I saw as ridiculous after only a month.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anyone can have opposing views Grey Bunny but not if they are claims that aren't even true and not when they come from someone who doesn't even watch the show and relies on EE or summaries to tell them what is going on. If someone watches the show everyday and brings stuff like that up, then it's more acceptable even if I disagree but if you don't watch the show everyday I can't someone's opinions seriously.

That is why I accept King's opinion-he watches the show everyday and has something to base his observations on.

And I guess I will say again GO GL!!!! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The point is not ridiculous. Days doesn't need characters like EJ, Willow, Nick or Benji. All of them have contracts and for what reason? I would rather see Vivian brought back instead of having all four of the above characters on this show. Vivian has established history and a very excellent actress. So no way was that point ridiculous!

So, just because Beth Milstein gave the characters a face-lift so to speak and gave me some good moments with Bo and Hope is ridiculous? I'm afraid you've assumed too much about me and that's wrong. If I got more out of the show from Milstein's interim writing, then so be it! I don't have a problem with Hogan putting Bo and Hope back together, but it would have really been nice if they addressed the problems they have. Not just swept under the rug.

You couldn't be more wrong than to make the assumption that I was against Hogan from the beginning. Where did I say that? I had very high hopes for the show. It's amazing to me that I get lumped into being in a fanbase that cries foul everytime something goes wrong with their couple. FYI, I don't even post on a Bo and Hope board, nor do I associate with any of their fans. So your assumptions of me is very wrong and I consider it very rude. My opinions are just as good as anyones on this board, yet you belittle mine. I didn't think I was posting on a board that likes everything sugarcoated. Apparently, I was mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMEN! I'm a regular viewer, a fan of the SHOW (not one or two couples), and I was THRILLED when Reilly was booted. But that doesn't mean I can't see things clearly... the show right now if very ho-hum. And yes, there are newer characters being brought on that aren't necessary. Good Lord, they gave Willow a contract? Heaven help us.

And my previous Beth Milstein comment... how is that not valid? She whipped the show into shape and cleaned up the stagnant mess Reilly had made. Do we know how her own storyline creations would pan out? No. But we sure saw what she can do about giving us payoff to storylines that were in limbo for years. Hogan's work started airing the same time NuShawn and Willow had their basketball court flirtation. And it's been pretty ho-hum ever since. I'm not saying we should can this guy, but it's time to kick things up a notch again.

I mean really, does anyone think Kayla's gonna die? NO. DAYS fans have become used to "near-death" cliffhangers (literally, in the case of Jack & Jenn) but we know a real death isn't happening, so why torture us with having a character 'dying' when we know the outcome? Let's get on with the story!

Stepping off my soap box.

Oh... and Go GL! Soon, we'll be seeing everyone on All My Children living at the Pine Valley Inn and congregating in a newly constructed "Main Street" or Pine Valley Pike or whatever they want to call it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy