Soaplovers

I think I recall the only reason Abby finally said something was because her nephew Michael was going to be blamed for drugs that were Olivia's and she finally decided to fess up. And if I recall, she spinned it as though she didn't say anything until she had definite proof. I even remember a scene where Val told Abby she knew she was looking for the twins and wasn't super angry with her.

Lifetime has gotten better with their V.C Andrew's adaptations...now making them limited series

1980s: Windmills of the Gods, Masters of the Game, and Rage of Angels were pretty good Sidney Sheldon mini-series in the 80s. They were a nice mix of trashy and classy. For classy, I would say 'I know my first name is Steven' and 'Baby M' were pretty good.. and both so tragic. 1990s: Stephen King had some great mini series: It, The Stand, and the Tommy Knockers. A good good mix of trashy and classy. 'A woman named Jackie' and 'The Odyssey' were pretty good and classy.

@KhanI didn't watch ATWT much.. but my late mom did. She described Melanie's Emily as tortured and sensual. When I watch old Youtubes of her Emily... I see someone that is hard/tough on the outside (on the account of her childhood), yet very soft on the inside. That dichotomy was what made her Emily so compelling to watch. She reminded me of a 40s actress in terms of how she portrayed Emily. Kelley's Emily was colder, tortured, yet very neurotic. She lacked the sensuality and sadness that Melanie's Emily had... but I did think her Emily was a good one.... if you looked at her Emily as an entirely different character.

I would add Deidre Hall because she was very popular in the 80s on Days.. plus had a bit of success as a working prime time actress in the late 80s/early 90s. I knew Loni would be good because she has the comedy/sitcom background and knows how to balance the line between campy and non-campy comedy. Susan Sullivan would be good if they do a follow up because she was known in the 80s for being the long suffering heroine, but also went onto success in sitcoms in the 90s and thereafter with a more broad style of acting. She could play a character in the follow up where she was known for playing the warm and moral center on the soap, like Maggie on FC, but behind the scenes be more like her character from Dharma and Greg. I also second Ana Alicia being in one of these types of movies. Her dismissal from FC helped cause a huge ratings drop and it would be nice for new generations to be re-introduced to her.

Nice to see Alexis and Heather are cordial. I truly think Dubrow started to hate Alexis so much because she went after her IMDb 1st (Angelina Jolie is a real actress is what Alexis said lol). My view of Crystal went down a lot if her close friends are Larsa, Louie, and Teresa. Angie K and Mary hanging out..hmmm. Kim Richards will always be a bit quirky,eccentric, and be funny at times. Something Kyle will never be. RHOBH: Kyle is a bottomless pit of need. Mo checked out and I'm sure Morgan will as well eventually

Soaps have fallen so much that there isn't anyone willing to do the job as head-writer that could be decent.

The thing people forget is that soap opera writing is vastly different than writing a play. Harding Lemay had the benefit of learning the ins and outs of soap opera writing from Irna Phillips so he knew what he could change and what needed to be maintained in order to successfully write AW. It sounds as though Corrinne had some great ideas, she just needed to be mentored by an established soap opera that could have helped her adapt her ideas to the soap opera format. Perhaps she could have co-headwritten with L Virginia Browne (who had head-wrote the show for most of 1981 and helped to stabilize the show in some respects that year). Also, on OLTL.. Michael Malone struggled his first months as headwriter because he didn't understand the machanics of writing a soap until he was paired with Josh Griffiths.

A local coffee shop trying to resist being taken over by a larger coffee chain (i.e. Starbucks, Peets, etx). It would be a natural gathering place for the youth and older characters

I wish youtube had the promo that aired days before Generations premiered.. because the promo had fast paced music, snippets of the cast arguing, acting mysterious and seductive. It made the show look enticing, but when it premiered.. I remember my 19 year old aunt watching it when I was very little and she said it was too boring. A half hour soap should not be boring. I actually think Ryan's Hope had great openings since it was about the Ryan family living in NYC. You saw scenes of the Ryan's and friends in various sites throughout NYC with a catchy theme song.

One issue I could have seen in RH in late 90s and 2000s would have been gentrification and more diversity. The neighborhood the show took place in had higher crime that peaked in the 90s and started to decline in the late 90s/early 00s...and led to building and park improvements..which led to gentrification in the 00s. And the show would had to have become more diverse in the 90s and 2000s to reflect trends in the real life locale.

@Khan @DeliaIrisFan Upon giving it some thought, Delia would probably have been the only character that I think Marland could truly have written well since she was a more neurotic version of Nola Reardon. The only other character that I think he might have had a good grasp on was Faith.. that character was such a Marland character and with his obsession with writing about therapy.. Faith was the perfect character.

I think Marland would have a very bad fit for the show. He wouldn't have been able to capture the essence of the Ryan's nor what made the show so unique. While Marland could write a good umbrella story, his day to day episodes were quite dry and boring with too much exposition. I used to watch episodes of his ATWT and GL and remark how unrealistic the characters were when interacting with one another. You needed a writer that could handle the half hour format, understood the dynamics of the Ryans/Coleridges, and captured the feel of the close knit New York City neighborhood. I can't think of any writer that could have been able to write about the Irish Catholic Ryans and the upper crust Coleridges well... that wasn't Claire Labine.

I think the problem with Marland writing a half hour soap was that he probably couldn't feature all the characters/stories that he wanted because of the half hour format. Half hour soaps have their unique challenges where you have to create a rich world with a smaller number of characters and plots than you could on an hour long show. There was an interview someone posted awhile back on one of the forums where Marland, Pam Long, and another writer were interviewed on TV.. and Pam Long said she found writing the half hour format harder than the hour format.

Jenna on AW was a fairly successful ingenue... but she had a backbone and wasn't written to be a Mary Sue and she had a fairly popular coupling with Dean in the early 90s

The situation with Iva is sadly a realistic thing in families.. especially back in the 80s/90s where sometimes the survivor (Iva) had to deal with being in the same room with their abuser and/or the person that hurt them. From what I recall, one of the factors that led to Kirk/Iva breaking up was when Iva's cousin (Lenore.. I think was her name) told her that Kirk was her ex husband that left her and the kids. So Iva rightfully told off Kirk and tried to put distance between her and Kirk.. which is a healthy response. However, Ellie decided to go for Kirk herself at the expense of her sister Iva's feelings.. and Iva, still in people pleasing mode, tried to be the bigger person. When viewing Iva's character arc from late 1985 into the the 1990s, I viewed Iva as having intense guilt for running away and leaving the family without a word to anyone. Those first episodes when Emma/Iva came face to face was very cold and intense.. and I sometimes wonder if Iva being 'the bigger person' was a way for her to make up for deserting the family. I don't know if Marland intentionally was showing that the survivor of abuse (Iva) was still being abused... but instead of it being physical/sexual.. it was more emotional abuse by the family.

The problem was that Marley always played second fiddle to Vicky.. because a character like Marley needed a writer that could make a character like Marley more naunced. Vicky was easy to write so writers like Swajeski, Sloane, etc tended to write for her and use Marley as a talk to for Vicky (except for the 1991/2 period where Marley had a story arc that didn't involve Vicky so much).

So David Jacob wanted KL to be a show about whiners? My parents watched Thirtysomething and both told me years later how almost all the characters whined and complained all the time. It was an actual punchline for many years about the show. At the same time, KL in season 1 wasn't sustainable and had to evolve. It was given ample amounts of time until it found its groove. Nowadays the show would have been canceled a few episodes into the first season. I think NBC had trouble with primetime soaps because they weren't looking for a show that would work..just any show that was soapy. Of the short lived shows NBC tried, Flamingo Road was the best of the bunch. And it's a shame that it got canceled instead of given more of a chance to right the ship.

When rewatching fall 1988 into mid 1989, Marley's need for a baby made perfect sense. She didn't have the found family that Vicky had nor did she truly have a mother because Donna had to withhold any maternal instincts when around Marley because of the lie that she was her older sister and not her mother. So when she married Jake in 1986, she finally hoped that she could have the stability/family that she never had growing up. Jake cheating on her was the first blow to her dream, and then finding out that she couldn't have children was another huge blow to her dream. I wonder if Lemay intended for Jake to be the real dad of Vicky's son Steven.. and that Marley would have started to believe that Vicky's son was really her child? There were a few hints where Bridget and I think Donna were concerned that Marley was too attached to Steven... and I figured maybe there would be a baby kidnapping that would have happened... which never came to be. I do think Lemay would have explored Marley's psychological issues in depth had he stayed on.. because her entire identity was ripped to shreds at 18 when she found out that not only did she have a twin sister.. but that the woman she thought was her sister was actually her real mother. There had to be resentment on Marley's part toward Donna.. and it wasn't really explored in detail except for one scene in 1989 where Marley goes off on Donna for not standing up to Reginald and being deprived of her father, mother, and sister... and I do think the 1998/1999 Marley breakdown and her torturing Donna was partly a way to lash out at Donna for not being strong enough to claim her as her daughter.

Michelle Phillip's would have been a better choice since her character on Knots basically was a replacement for Abby.

female serial killers tend to have different motivations, different array of victims, and sometimes less messy methods for disposing of their victims. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/wicked-deeds/201906/the-unique-motives-female-serial-killers So the motivation of the Loving murders, types of methods used to kill the victims, and the variety of victims match.

Actually, Anne heche did play Marley for a few episodes in fall 1987 before coming on full time the next year. She came after Vicky had an accident that resulted in her being in a coma.. and Marley came to visit and instantly was calling out Reginald/Michael. She had a much handle on the role in those few days than she did when she came back as Marley full time the following year.

The reason why Dynasty worked was because the writing and performers played it as non-camp.. and that was why it was such a memorable over the type campy show. Fresno was all camp and played too broadly. The key to good camp is to play it straight, have a relatable story, and have characters you care about. Fresno offered none of that.

This is a pretty decent episode and it proved that the Dobsons weren't a complete disaster writing for ATWT. I can see why P & G thought the Dobsons could work their magic on ATWT, but ATWT was in worse shape than GL was when they took over. It was going to take a lot longer to fix ATWT than it was to fix GL.. and also I think that the viewers for ATWT were a bit older/more conservative than the viewers watching GL. Even so, I did like the scenes between Tom/Carol... and I liked the debate that Maggie/Lyla had over John Dixon. There was some strong elements here that never really gelled (either because of P & G having mandates, the upcoming writer strike, or the fact that the Dobsons weren't the right fit for the show).

Only toxic people stay at a company in a position of power for so long. Good riddance.