Jump to content

The View: Barbara reprimands Elizabeth on air!


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well, I'm 'for' people not spreading their legs without protection and having easy 'outs' like abortion, which teaches no one involved life lessons about actions and consequences. Abortion, morning after pills, no matter what you call them, they are all crutches for irresponsible, careless behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm all for people to get responsible too, but when the irresponsible behavior has been done, I'm more for certain types of people who are not responsible enough not having kids, b/c the kids suffer. It's all about how you see different sides of the situation and if Bitsy wants to see it her way, then that is her opinion and she has a right to have it, and not use morning after pills and get abortions, and she can even judge the ones who do. But for her to want to make it illegal is another story. That's wanting to control other people's lives, views and actions.

And she can state her opinion in a more mature way, maybe it would come across better and open some minds to some of what she thinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh as much as I dislike her, I cant wait for Rosie O'Donnell to join bc she would not let Elizabeth get away with the way she acted today. She will chew her apart and would shut her down. Im looking forward to seeing that !@#$%^&*]fest start

things arent always black and white though. These arent just crutches for careless behavior. Joy was trying to bring up points where its out of the woman's control. What about a 12 year old girl thats a victim of incest? A woman who's raped and attacked against her will, etc...? Elizabeth was fixated on one viewpoint and Joy tried to bring into the topic that there are other circumstances besides just any random woman having sex and not wanting a baby.

The main topic isnt even about the morning after pill. Its about Elizabeh and her behavior. She needs to learn to conduct herself in a more professional manner. There's a way to express your opinion without shoving it down people's throats. She didnt let anyone form an opinion on this subject but instead dominated it with her ranting and yelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, no matter what anyone says most people keep their views on this issue. I can understand her frustration. Since everyone WAS a fetus at one point, you'd think (I would anyway) that we'd recognize their right to life and want to give everyone an 'equal opportunity' at life, which, even though current laws won't uphold, we do have a right to, under the consitution. But because of language that speaks of personal autonomy and propaganda that turns innocent children into "parasites" or even "sexually transmitted diseases," others won't jump on that belief bandwagon. I can understand Bitsy's frustration. And given that she's vastly outnumbered on "The View", I don't fault her for losing it just to get a word in. Abortion makes all of us pro-lifers desperate because it just seems so common sensical, to us, how this issue should be viewed.

That said, I hope she can frame her opinions in a more worthy manner, in the future. Evidently, her current approach isn't moving minds.

Well, you wouldn't agree with me Cheap but I don't see how any of those circumstances make a woman powerfless from choosing life. Again, this 'unwanted pregnancies are sexually transmitted diseases' propaganda is what furthers the belief that unborn children, no matter how they're conceived, are expendable. In reality, children are just children. They have no 'devil horns' on them nor are they tainted. Rape is a violent act, but the child that may result is beautiful and, I would think, help heal the wounds because something beautiful came from something grotesque (and for many women, they've said just that). I don't, nor will I ever believe, anyone 'needs' abortion. Pregnancy isn't a bad thing. It's not a bad consequence. It's NATURAL. Abortion, then, is unnatural. That's just how I feel, and though, in this society, some, if not most, may think it radical, I won't stop believing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AS A MAN AND A 17 YEAR OLD I DONT MUCH ABOUT THIS SUBJECT. With that said if someone happens to get pregnant unwillingly, under any circumstance, why can't that person, if they really feel they don't want a child give it up for adoption to family that me not even be able to have children etc....?????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously, why don't you actually try to see from another viewpoint and realize that things happen to the most careful and precautious people. It's one thing not to agree with these pills for yourself, but no one has the right to decide that for another person, and that is what people seem to be doing IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, obviously, I disagree, because I feel no one has the right to decide who should and shouldn't enter this world when, again, everyone should have a 'right to life.' I understand the other side's position and opinions, I've studied it rather thoroughly even, but that's never going to change the bloody, gory act of abortion, and my view that humans, no matter what their age, deserve better; nor will it change my view from a purely ethical feeling that abortion of any kind treats humans as a mere means to an end; nor will it change my belief that humans going against their own in an almost cannibalistic way, and living in a society in which that kind of 'radical thinking' is somehow ethically just, is just horribly wrong. So yes, I can see from the other side, but the pros they claim, to me, don't outweigh the serious cons. A woman has an abortion and for pro-choice feminists, it might seem like a load off her shoulders, but in the grand scheme of things, the burden of having an unwanted child seems rather insignificant compared to the reality that someone who could be the greatest peacemarker or the first woman president, is gone before they even have the chance to make their mark on the world.

Obviously, you're prochoice, so you don't see it as we do. It's not a person's choice. That choice is a child who has a right to life and make their mark on the world. We speak for those who can't speak. That's not 'butting my nose where it doesn't belong.' An unborn child can't fight for her right to life so it's a GOOD thing that people care enough about children they don't even know to lend them a voice. I'm sorry but the woman is not the victim in the case of abortion. The one aborted always is, because they never had a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

believe it or not, I agree with Elizabeth to a degree. I was raised Catholic and I dont personally beleive in abortion. I beleive that all life should be valued. I dont beleive in abortion or morning after pill being used as a way to make someone's life convenient bc they didnt want a child when they had sex. In this day and age, people should be educated enough to use the proper protection before it even gets to that point but things happen. Every situation is different and the woman's circumstances, life, etc... should all be taken into account. I just dont see how it has to be so black and white. A 12 year old thats raped by her father and becomes pregnant doesnt necesarily have the mental capacity to raise a child or go through a pregnancy. The constant rape could be traumatic enough and unwanted pregnancy which would tie her and child to the stigma of incest for life can be damaging. Thats just one example of a different viewpoint and as people, I think we need to be more open minded to hear them out without being so quick to shut them down bc we dont like nor agree with them.

That said, even though I dont personally believe in abortion, if someone feels the need to have one themselves, then thats their business and no one but them and their god should have to worry about. I have no right to judge anyone for what they choose to do. It's their choice and only they can choose what's right for them. And this is where Elizabeth and I disagree. She doesnt like it, then fine, but dont go forcing your viewpoints on others. When you yell and rant, people tend to not listen. I think people were more inclined to think she looked crazy than take her seriously

there are a number of reasons. Pregnancy lasts about 9 months and thats a long time, considering how the body changes. It's not the most pleasant thing to deal with. Also the longer the child is inside the mother, the more she gets attached to it and the harder it becomes to give the baby away. There are many cases of women planning on giving their child up for adoption but changing their minds once they hold them

Have you ever been pregnant? It's not the easiest thing to go through, physically and mentally, especially if you arent 100% into it. It's easy to judge especially when it's something you will never experience
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As a man this issue isn't all that important to me either.....

but i do have a couple of issues with this thread.....for starters why is elizabeth out of line.....she has a very strong opinion about this topic, is it ok for the other side of the coin to express their views, but not the conservatives?? The media is always forcing certain topics down everyone's throats, and elizabeth happens to be in the minority being a concervative in the media.

Now I agree that if someone was raped, then maybe it is ok for this type of contraceptive, and contraceptives taken before the act are another issue. I agree with the person who suggested adoption, if you are going to take a risk, then you have to face the consequences

Also, someone said that it is sometimes better for the child who may have forced a hard life.......I for one would rather have a hard life than no life at all. At least that way you have a chance to make your life better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Have you seen the adoption system here? It's easier to get a child from overseas than in the U.S. So that's where a lot of families go.

One thing that really bothers me is the argument that a lot of pro-lifers make about adoption, yet I do not see them adopting these kids. Where are they? If they talk about how pregnant women who don't want their kids should adopt, why aren't they taking these kids?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really wish I had the whole clip so you could see the whole picture. The segment started with Barbera reading the headline about the morning after pill becoming over the counter and Elizabeth immediately jumped on it and started yelling out her opinion and how she felt. Joy tried to give different scenearios where its not necesarily about a woman being selfish (the rape and incest example) but Elizabeth was not hearing it and continued to rant and yell. She was out of control the way she was completely dominating, so Barbera had to quiet her. THAT is why she was out of line. It had nothing to do with what she was talking about. It was the way she chose to express herself. Her behavior was immature, unprofessional and overbearing. This has nothing to do with liberal vs conservative. There was NO liberal viewpoint bc Elizabeth wouldnt let anyone give a different opinion on the topic bc she kept yelling everytime someone tried to. This was about how one woman decided to make an ass of herself on tv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly, and that's only natural for women to bond with their babies. That's another reason why abortion makes no sense to me. Even with the abortion, those maternal instincts must still be there, and for many women, they probably will always wonder what the child would have looked like, smelled like, what job they'd take, how far they'd go in life, etc. I just don't see the reason why some people defend something that many women have tearfully railed against after doing. By all these pro-choice and women's rights marches, many women are sold that this is the best option (even if Planned Parenthood, which I believe, recently broke fiscal records, won't admit it,) and many women who fall for it just end up getting hurt. And no one, not one, knows if it will happen to them, if they haven't had an abortion before. No one knows if they'll develop that stress and anxiety after the fact. And for the ones who laugh about it and laugh after the fact, I just shake my head at how desensitized this world has become. Though people can trot out different arguments in favor of it, I can trot out just as many against it. What about father's rights? She may be carrying it, but, property-wise, it's not hers...it's just a very tangled issue and it's sad that it may never be resolved because evidently, both sides are always going to say they're right and that'll be that. Hell, even if technology eventually proves that unborn children experience excruciating pain during an abortion, I bet pro-choice feminists still wouldn't give in. Personal autonomy has taken over, I believe, human dignity, common decency and natural rights. And that's why I say it's not a personal choice and stand against it.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Through to the big final on Saturday: Norway, Albania, Sweden, Iceland, the Netherlands, Poland, San Marino, Estonia, Portugal and the Ukraine Eliminated:  Slovenia, Belgium, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Cyprus
    • GH 1976 . A transition as the show went to 45 mins and the revamp continued. From the Daytime serial Newletter  PT 1 Since 1963 General Hospital, the story of the staff of the seventh floor at General Hospital in the town of Port Charles, has endeavored to show the personal problems and emotional conflicts faced by the members of a medical team, who must at all times be ready to save lives. Dr. Steve Hardy, his staff’s source of emotional support and advice as well as their professional chief, is increasingly upset by the marital problems of Dr. Jim Hobart and his wife, Audrey, Steve was once married to Audrey and still has strong although concealed feelings for her, and he resents Hobart’s futile efforts to stop drinking and straighten out his life, as his failures are dragging Audrey down with him. Dr. Leslie Faulkner is married to business tycoon Cameron Faulkner, who recently financed a free clinic for her at General Hospital. But Leslie’s professional life has been overshadowed by the shocking discovery that her illegitimate child, born when Leslie was a college student, didn’t die at birth, as she had been told, but rather, on her domineering father’s instructions, was substituted for the stillborn child of a Mrs. Barbara Vining. Cam has helped Leslie locate the child but is definitely resentful of the intrusion of another focus for Leslie’s love into their lives.  Young med student Bobby Chandler has just married nurse Samantha Livingstone but is concealing his recent discovery that his life-insurance application was rejected because of a suspicious blood-test result. Psychiatrist Peter Taylor has reconciled his emotional upheaval at the discovery that Martha, the child of his wife, Diana, was fathered by the late Dr. Phil Brewer (by rape) and that Diana will not be able to  have another child, as a hysterectomy was necessary after Martha’s birth. Diana suffers feelings of inadequacy, believing she is beneath Peter socially, as she was a waitress before successfully completing nurses’training. Nurse Jessie Brewer, who was married to Phil years ago, has tried to show Diana that her present accomplishments have overcome her disadvantaged origins.   Dr. Leslie Faulkner, driven by the recent knowledge that her baby daughter was taken from her at birth, has learned that thirteen-year-old Laura Vining is that child. When Laura’s mother expresses concern at the attention and gifts that a total stranger is showering upon her daughter, Laura points out that Leslie is not really a stranger—the news magazines are always carrying articles about international business magnate Cameron Faulkner and his doctor wife. Barbara is even more upset when she realizes that Cameron Faulkner is having his employees check on them. Cam himself is upset by Leslie’s preoccupation with the girl, and warns Leslie that many lives could be irreparably harmed if Laura finds out she’s illegitimate. Leslie retains an attorney, Curtis Baxter, whose reputation doesn’t stress ethics. He advises her to sue for custody if a personal appeal to the Vinings to relinquish the child doesn’t produce results. Barbara’s fears are more than realized when she returns Leslie’s extravagant Christmas gift to Laura—an electric typewriter—and Leslie, pressed by Barbara to explain her interest in Laura, reveals that she just recently learned that her own father bribed her nurse to switch her newborn daughter for Barbara’s stillborn child, to “protect” his unwed daughter. At home, Barbara tells her husband, Jason, that she didn’t see their baby until the day after she was born, as the delivery was long and difficult, and she now remembers that Nurse Roach was somewhat reluctant to hand her the child. But the biggest fear they  face is that Laura might somehow learn that her parents weren’t married when she was born, as Jason was on military service in the Pacific. Baxter serves the Vinings with a writ of habeas corpus, requiring them to have Laura in court on the specified day. Cam assures them he will make sure there is no painful press coverage and that all efforts are taken to prevent Laura from being emotionally upset. The Vinings then find that they must submit to blood tests to determine whose blood groupings match Laura’s. In court, Leslie again painfully explains the circumstances of her birth and the recent revelations by a dying Nurse Roach which led to her search for Laura. The Vinings are horrified to learn that the blood tests have revealed that neither of their blood types matches Laura’s. Medically this means that Jason can’t be Laura’s father—but Barbara could still be her mother. But Barbara has assured Jason that he is the only man she has ever been intimate with. Faced with this incontrovertible evidence, the Vinings realize that Leslie’s claim has basis; and since Barbara is too emotional to tell Laura what they have learned, Jason tells her. Laura is told she will have to decide whether she wants to make her home with the Vinings or with the woman she has just been told is her real mother. When Laura level headedly replies that she doesn’t know Leslie well enough to make this decision, the judge rules favorably on a one-month temporary custody order for the Faulkners and explains that Laura may decide then. Cam is upset at the way Leslie uses this month to give Laura a whirlwind introduction to the jet-set life, managing to quickly arrange a round-the-country tour with parties and social events including movie stars and other celebrities. He warns that Leslie is trying to win Laura by the material things she can give her and that she is obviously counting on Laura’s deciding to live with them.  At the end of the month Laura is still unable to come to a decision, so the temporary custody is extended for another month. But Laura is now torn between the glamor of the Faulkners’ life and her love for the Vinings, who are forbidden by the court order to contact her during the decision period. Leslie is spending so much time with Laura that her medical career is suffering, but she tells Cam it doesn’t matter, as she is planning to leave medicine to devote her full attention to her daughter. Cam warns her that she’s risking heartbreak by assuming she will get permanent custody of Laura, and again suggests she is trying to buy the girl’s love with possessions. Leslie retorts that Cam’s objections seem to stem from the selfish desire to have their life return to the glittering comfort they had when there were just the two of them to consider.  But when Laura falls ill with influenza meningitis she deliriously calls for her “real mother,” rejecting Leslie’s presence. Leslie is horrified when Barbara shows up, summoned by Cam, and demands to see her daughter. Leslie tells Dr. Steve Hardy she’s going to lose Laura and it’s Cam who is taking her away. In Laura’s best interest, Barbara and Leslie join forces to help the child’s recovery. But her doctors are puzzled when her symptomatic fever and convulsions continue after the meningitis is overcome. Leslie’s emotional condition isn’t helped when Cam insists ‘that her constant vigil over Laura is obsessive and she’s neglecting him. He makes it clear that she is going to have to choose. Needing help with these pressures, she consults psychiatrist Peter Taylor, who helps her see Cam’s side, and they make up. But Peter’s probing has made Leslie face another truth that Laura’s illness may be psychosomatic, due to the choice she must make. As Leslie faces the growing realization that she is the cause of her daughter’s illness and she may have to give her up to make her well, Cam secretly visits the judge and asks that he decide to return Laura to the Vinings in order to save Leslie from the guilt of giving up her daughter herself. :
    • 1976 Part 3 Peggy Brooks, the youngest Brooks daughter, upset over her parents’ recent marital trouble, has turned to her college teaching assistant for help with her studies, and then for emotional support. Jack Curtis is deeply attracted to her but tries to warn her not to get emotionally involved. But Peggy confesses she’s fallen in love with him, and he knows he returns her feelings. Jack, whose real name is Johnny Kryzynski, a name he feels is too difficult for professional use, is married to Joanne, a waitress at the Allegro, Leslie Elliot’s restaurant. Joanne, who is very overweight, is on another of her frequent reducing diets, hoping to regain Johnny’s love and attention. She is encouraged by Brock Reynolds, who manages the Allegro for Leslie. Sympathizing with her problem and her need for her husband’s love, Brock tells. her she must feel beautiful herself before other people can see it. One night, while discussing Joanne’s previous, fruitless attempts to diet, Jack asks her a question he’d never actually asked ‘before: Why had she gained all  that weight? Joanne painfully tells him that she found out a year after they were married that she was pregnant. When she sounded him out about children, he had made it clear they couldn’t have a child until he’d finished school, so she secretly had an abortion, which left her feeling so empty that she ate to fill the emptiness. For the first time in a long time, Jack put his arms around her and kisses her. Feeling that Johnny really cares now that he knows about the abortion, Joanne’s trying very hard'to stay on her diet. But Peggy, having lunch at the Allegro, confides in her friendly waitress that she’s in love, and the man’s name is Jack Curtis. Joanne is heartsick, not only for herself but for Peggy, who obviously has no idea that Jack is married. Knowing that Peg’s sister Chris Foster works for Legal Aid, Joanne consults Chris about a legal name change, explaining that her husband, Johnny Kryzynski, uses the name Jack Curtis professionally she may as well make it their legal name. Chris makes the connection and tells her father about it. Stuart confronts Jack, demanding to know how he could do this to his wife and to Peg, and what he is going to do about it. Jack asks for time to let Peg down easily. When Peg learns that her father has seen Jack, she furiously informs him to stay out of her relationship with Jack. Peg later apologizes for her angry words, but she and her father cross swords again over Jack, and, backed into a verbal corner, Stuart blurts out, ‘For’ God’s sake, he’s a married man!” Disbelieving, Peggy goes to Jack, who tries to explain he’s started to tell her many times but, not wanting to hurt her, kept hoping for a better time to do it. Peggy, in shock, goes to the Allegro to think this out. Seeing the pain Peggy’s suffering, Joanne goes over to her and gently tells Peg she understands the hurt she’s going through—they are both in love with the same man, because Jack Curtis is her husband. Jill, having decided she must have revenge on Kay, has liquor delivered to her daily. When this doesn’t drive Kay back to alcoholism, Jill embarks upon a campaign to'convince Kay that Phillip is still alive. Jill slips into the Chancellor house each evening, after Liz has left, and leads Kay into reliving incidents and conversations which occurred over a year ago, when Jill was Kay’s paid companion. In this way Jill shakes Kay’s acceptance of Phillip’s death and has her convinced that Phillip is only away on a business trip. But Liz and Brock discover Jill’s grisly charade and begin to help Kay back to reality. Faced with the enormity of what she’s been doing, Jill realizes how wrong this is and decides to end the hostilities.
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Falcon Crest, and Knots Landing episodes for the week of October 24, 1983.
    • I really don't want to see some old P&G actors on the show. To me Lindstrom and McLain have brought nothing special. The show needs to find new talent, so it has it's own identity,which overall they have. Timon, Tricia, Ambyr are breakouts. Most of the others are fine .We all know the exceptions.
    • I would wager that was because it was a new character for the likes of Devon, Lily and Nate to interact with. Watching the likes of Billy fall in love again-Phyllis, Chelsea,Lily and now Sally is repetitive, especially when he is no prize. Josh doesn't really do long term couples. So every year or so they swap partners. It diminishes them as characters as they don't seem to grow or learn from the past. We know those characters so well and they've been through just about everything, so the only solution is to involve them with new characters and have them react to the newbies drama. They tried with Ashland and the Rosales but Josh dumped the latter and wrote so badly for Ashland who could have been a long term antagonist. All we got was another short lived marriage for Victoria and another accidental killing. And Josh thinks having them sit in restaraunts for the whole episode talking business, mergers, takeovers and job switching is interestring. It's not. I feel sorry for the actors who must know they are serving shite.
    • If I were to cast a Soap Opera veteran as Jan.. I would have picked Krista Allen (of Days and B & B fame) since she did move to the Atlanta area in late 2023... and knows all there is about the Soap opera way of filming.  And I could see her playing Ashley's mom.
    • Is the set for Lulu's new house an updated version of the set used for the childhood home of Luke, Bobbie and Pat Spencer?
    • I feel like AMC would be the easiest of their soaps to revive but a reboot seems cursed at this point. I wish we had more insight on what was pitched for the primetime reboot as well as these movies. That would give us a better idea of why it keeps getting shot down.
    • Mansion of the Damned sure is a "talkative" horror movie.  In the past when I've watched those episodes, I was paying attention to The Edge of Night characters and not really zeroing in on the rehearsals/blocking/filming of the actual movie.  This time I've been following the plot of Mansion of the Damned pretty closely, and all I can say is Hester Atherton and Nicholas Harriman are about the most chit-chatty Witch and Devil I've ever heard in my life!     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy