GH: May 2025 Discussion Thread

[Contessa Donatella]

Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 

[carolineg]

You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".  

Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.  

 

[Contessa Donatella]

How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.

[Errol]

Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid.

Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.

[carolineg]

Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't.

But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.  

Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here. 

I am just wasting my time even responding.

 

 

[Liberty City]

Basic script work; if it hadn't been for Jane Elliot and Rena Sofer, it could've been for any random character.

[carolineg]

Yeah, I thought it would be more explosive or heated and it was kind of standard.  Both can do more with the material.  I just don't think the writing was there.

[Vee]

It's one thing to post about a soap's rumors or gossip, which in point of fact we've all done. It's another to present yourself as the inside source who knows something to be fact that's about to break wide, then backtrack and call it just Twitter speculation. Between those two extreme poles you have to commit to one or the other. If I got something wrong, I'd say it. (Nor would I keep playing insider after what I pulled with Drake Hogestyn, which should've gotten someone permanently banned.)

And regardless, you don't open with this 'news' you don't actually want to stand by yet by mocking DRW's extremely valid concerns re: how the Trina character and Tabyana Ali has been marginalized and put out to virtual pasture ever since the day NAC left. Her playing out her current contract in a C-storyline with Kai does not change that.

Edited 12 hours ago by Vee

[MontyB]

Well, it's going to be something when he finds out the truth. 

Agreed. 

On that note, I can't until it all comes out. I find Lulu to be ridiculous. 

Edited 11 hours ago by MontyB

[DRW50]

I'd say just the opposite - conflict means they will find out and then be at odds. For the limited amount of time people on this show have conflict (if they aren't named Nina or Ric, I guess).

[depboy]

I’ve been enjoying the pace the show has taken recently. Things don’t languish as long as they have and if they are drawing something out, like Gio’s adoption, it’s hasn’t been as excruciating.

Also, my nosey nature would appreciate less interaction with posters I have on ignore so I don’t have to click on “options”.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited 10 hours ago by depboy

[Jdee43]

I don't think Lois the character was there.  The Lois we knew from the 90s has pretty much died with this  Gio story crap.

[prefab1]

I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 

[AbcNbc247]

For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

Please register in order to view this content

Edited 3 hours ago by AbcNbc247

[DRW50]

I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.