Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted

what difference does it make? You're arguing semantics at this point. If the show is off the air, its cancelled. ABC cancelled all of their other owned soaps and if and when that ever happens to GH, the same verbiage will be used

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Where am I arguing, though? I'm not in an argument; it's called a conversation. And of course the same verbiage would be used; the human species is dumb.

Edited by Liberty City
  • Members
Posted

Arguing

1. give reasons or cite evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory, typically with the aim of persuading others to share one's view.

2. exchange or express diverging or opposite views, typically in a heated or angry way.

I used the word in context of definition 1, not 2, which was part of the conversation. And it doesnt make anyone dumb for using the cancel verbiage if ABC ended, because that would be exactly what it is.

  • Members
Posted

If NBC had wanted to cancel them they could have. At the time I did think they were moving them to Peacock to cancel the show more easily but it's run on there a few years longer than I had expected.

I like Chris McKenna and Cosgrove is OK, but I wish they'd tried a soap newcomer in the part. 

  • Members
Posted

I can assure you, I was neither heated nor angry. At all. 

Please register in order to view this content

 But believe what you want; you're entitled to your wrong opinion. I'm telling you I wasn't arguing. That's my fact.  Enjoy the rest of your evening, Cheap.

Wasn't my aim, either. But thanks for the definition of "arguing," which I did not need. 

  • Members
Posted

This. Because how can one not get snarky about yet another hire when there are so many on contract they should/could be using.

  • Members
Posted

I'll be very surprised if Nina is paired with anyone on this show ever again, especially since she's been so drastically back-burned over the last year or so and this show doesn't seem to have any real interest in her. I feel like Nina may more than likely remain single for the rest of her days or at least for as long as this show continues to be on air. Honestly I think she's better off single anyway and she is better off as a supportive friend and talk to than being a viable romantic interest to any potential leading man. 

Posted

Well, I think it's a terrible waste. If you bring Cynthia Watros on what I want is full bore OTT & back again, crazy as a loon!! Of course, that's really changing the subject from romantic pairing! LOL.

  • Members
Posted

Well, that's different from having a romantic interest. Honestly, since they are not using Nina that much anyway as a character, they should just ultimately write her off by having her go crazy and insane while ending things with a big bang. Big bonus if she somehow manages to have both Willow and Drew killed in the process. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy