GH: December 2024 Discussion Thread
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Recent Posts
-
Same here. Anyone who voluntarily left Margo's penthouse set (except to go overseas or to Heaven) was immediately on my blacklist. lol. -
https://x.com/MicheleValJean/status/1919575319146856657 -
By Soaplovers · Posted
The penthouse was my favorite set... and it changed hands from Margo to Draper/April to Miles/Nicole then to just Miles... before he opted to give that beautiful place for that drab house with the even more drab Beth. That was a jump the shark moment for me LOL -
The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious. April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn). Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house. Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford. The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars). Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000. If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell. Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm. Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello. If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery. All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control. Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse. Each of the sets is completely different. And their budget was like zero, lol.
-
It felt weird and out of place. I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. -
.thumb.png.5c728e3a5029e28d95defc3cf6a72cdb.png)
By Liberty City · Posted
It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever.Please register in order to view this content
-
Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs? Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place? -
Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades. -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.Please register in order to view this content
-
By Liberty City · Posted
Not unless they live in an apartment complex.Please register in order to view this content
-
That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room. Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed. Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.