Jump to content

DAYS: September 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Thanks!  I knew in my head that BF had more "issues" a few years ago and went off on social media for awhile there.  Even with the criticism he gave on the interview he came off much more level headed and not so in his feelings.  

On this whole topic in general, I actually think BF has stood up for MM as his co star a lot.  I really don't care if he dislikes the writing and he can have his say.  I know I couldn't run around talking bad about my bosses or my job to a bunch of people while currently being employed, but I feel like acting/soaps/entertainment is a slightly different business. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I agree with you and Antoyne. I don't think it's unprofessional at all, and I have no problem with actors having opinions -- even critical ones -- about their characters.

I never knew so many people were put off by Billy Flynn's "arrogance." I'd rather hear his real opinion about the writing than some lie about how wonderful everything is.

 

Sorry, that is MUCH better than 7/10.

If that's a 7/10, I'd sure as hell like to know who gets an 8, 9, or 10.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really can see both sides of this.  It probably is a bit unprofessional and wouldn't be great in a normal workplace, but I don't have a problem with it.

I should clarify that I didn't think Billy's current statements in the last interview were "arrogant", but he has come off very arrogant in the past.  And clearly took time away to re-evaluate.  I am still personally a little put off by him.  I still think he has a high opinion of himself, but has become better spoken and more aware of how he comes off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel a bit nuts, because it seems like my point keeps getting distorted.

Professionalism aside, I am responding to the ongoing issue that actors are willing to express their distaste over creative aspects of the show, while never speaking out on the pay disparity and harassment of their female co-workers. 

For example, Billy Flynn laments the lack of focus on Chad and Abby, but never speaks to the perceived inequity behind the scenes that may have led to the resignation of both actresses who played the part.  When almost every leading actress of a certain age quits or is fired, that is an issue that goes beyond the creative choices of the headwriter. 

It is just that simple.

Meanwhile, I still can't believe that they are going to shoot the soap in the pub.  And furthermore, I would argue that Carson Boatman currently has the cutest tush in daytime 9.8/10.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually am not getting your point.  He has spoken up for Marci several times.  I am not sure if there is any actual proof there was inequity behind the scenes for either MM or KM.  MM didn't want a contract.  KM didn't want a long term contract either. That's up to them.  They personally have never spoken on that specific pay disparity or harassment unless I am missing something. 

I don't know what you want Billy Flynn to do.  Go on a tangent about Arianne Zucker?  It was an interview about his character.  

I think what you are trying to say makes sense, but in my mind it means every single person currently working on Days should speak out and that's just not logical.  For them or for anyone else still employed there.  It's a nice sentiment, but not realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am simply struck by the discourse encouraging actors to spill tea on creative issues, while ignoring what I perceive as the more pressing issues of inequity within production.  The creative concerns may be intriguing, but the treatment of women is a great concern for me.  Even though I agree with your point that it may not always be realistic to mention it in every interview.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most men in daytime owe their career to their on-screen romantic partner.  And I was moved by Arianne Zucker's statement that when she was asked to take a paycut, none of her male co-stars voiced their support.  Also, I don't think it is a huge stretch of the imagination that KM or MM might have been more willing to sign a contract if they didn't see their female peers being asked to accept less money.  Especially because KM signed a contract with another network.

So, just once, I want to hear some actor acknowledge the sacrifices that their co-stars have made.  As well as the privileges that allow them to be more concerned about the direction of their character, rather than whether they'll be disrespected the next time they renegotiate their contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't make me break my promise, but, I'm certain someone will mention that Lucci, Hall, or Slezak may have made more than their male co-star.  However, I think you could count those women on one hand, and it doesn't mean that they were given equal privileges. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Put me in the minority in being happy about Cat not being Abby. After the two adult recasts played tag with the role, it's time for a few years of rest. I have a huge list of things I hate about RC's writing, but that choice was not one of them. 
    • Except she never worked there at all and barely even knew where the Chancellor Industries plant was located  In 1980, Kay attempted to install Derek Thurston (her third husband) in a position at Chancellor Industries.  The show introduced a character named George Packard who'd supposedly been running Chancellor since Phillip's demise in 1975.  (George Packard's storyline in 1980 was attempting to keep Derek Thurston from bankrupting the company.)   We didn't hear much of anything about Chancellor Industries for the next twenty-five years.  Then, at that point, we met Eliot Hampton (?) who'd been running the company for decades and had been embezzling from it.  Jill took it upon her herself to oust Eliot Hampton (?) and take control of the company.  That's when Kay became actively involved in the management of the company.  From 1974 till 2004 Kay Chancellor was strictly a hands-off owner.  It was downright absurd that the last ten years of life, she was written as this formidable businesswoman who'd always been involved in Chancellor Industries.  
    • Well, it's going to be something when he finds out the truth.  Agreed.  On that note, I can't until it all comes out. I find Lulu to be ridiculous. 
    • I almost posted this because that was my initial reaction too:  this is weird/cringe, to sing around a piano after such a huge family shattering bomb was dropped.  But I got over that and just enjoyed her voice, the song and the montage we saw as everyone's emotions in the aftermath were pouring out.
    • The Equalizer original series was not a big hit yet it became a movie franchise and got a reboot series. The Equalizer reboot lasted 5 seasons, so one season longer than the original series.
    • Today is Sean Freeman's birthday 

      Please register in order to view this content

      His social media/IMDb doesn't have his age but from some posts he's made, I'm guessing 1989 is his birth year.
    • Here's the timeline, as I recall it being published. The WGA strike was 5/2–9/27/2023 Annalynne McCord was announced as being hired in December 2023, for a one-year contract https://deadline.com/2024/06/days-of-our-lives-when-to-expect-annalynne-mccord-peacock-1235975806/ RonC's first scripts back from the strike began airing May 31, 2024 (around Konstantine & Maggie's wedding) https://www.tvinsider.com/1137709/days-of-our-lives-writers-return-15000th-episode-storylines/ Her first air date was June 19th 2024. The actress has said she was not told who she would be playing until she started taping. RonC 's replacements were announced July 2024, with his scripts airing through April 2025 Side note: DAYS social media team seems to be playing fast and loose with BTS videos, in terms of how far in advance they film content (e.g. their April Fools' Joke videos were clearly not filmed on 4/1/25), so we shouldn't assume anyone's current status, versus those who were there nine months ago.
    • April and her husband (Draper) are the "young leads" who tie all the storyline threads together.  They're normally in the center of the action.  In this particular storyline, Draper is the attorney who represents Paige Madison.  (The district attorney, Logan Swift, has given Paige Madison "temporary immunity from prosecution" if she will lead the police to the members of the Tobias Gang who stole the firearms.  But Paige mainly just ducks bullets from various gang members who pop-up to assassinate her.)    
    • It's one thing to post about a soap's rumors or gossip, which in point of fact we've all done. It's another to present yourself as the inside source who knows something to be fact that's about to break wide, then backtrack and call it just Twitter speculation. Between those two extreme poles you have to commit to one or the other. If I got something wrong, I'd say it. (Nor would I keep playing insider after what I pulled with Drake Hogestyn, which should've gotten someone permanently banned.) And regardless, you don't open with this 'news' you don't actually want to stand by yet by mocking DRW's extremely valid concerns re: how the Trina character and Tabyana Ali has been marginalized and put out to virtual pasture ever since the day NAC left. Her playing out her current contract in a C-storyline with Kai does not change that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy