Jump to content

DAYS: September 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

True.  That would be so soapy though.  Her and Tate are dullsville.  I guess they could revisit her and Johnny.

Especially when they planted the (fake) seeds that she had a crush on him way back when and then the way she is physically with him currently.  Holly hugging him and saying he's the only one she can trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree that he has to older, I just think he needs to be more savvy. 

For example, many people commented on how Tate treated Brady when he was drugged last week.  Tate is the son of two addicts, yet he seems so unbothered and uninformed on the topic.  I refuse to believe that Kim wouldn't have talked to him about addiction, sobriety, and the familial patterns.  And I get that he's a selfish teen, (and he needed to leave the townhouse for storyline reasons), but he just seems dense.  Even having conflict between Holly and Tate due to his refusal to drink or smoke pot would've seemed more organic.

As for Holly, her desire to get justice for "Aunt Sarah" feels too sudden and totally unmotivated by history.  I don't understand how she doesn't see through EJ's obvious manipulation.  It would be fine if she was using EJ to get back at Eric.  But, the idea that she doesn't have anyone to discuss her misgivings with trusting EJ feels like a mistake.  Once again, I wish that they had developed the Holly and Chanel relationship, after the coma, and made Chanel into more of an aspirational force for Holly.  Someone who she trusts because she's cool, she's never betrayed her, and she's insightful.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would make more sense.  I don't want them to fall into the Shawn/Belle mold where they are destined to be together forever and ever.  That's boring.  Obviously, Nicole being off canvas is a fail, but other people around town being scandalized by it could make up for it.  EJ needs to be his sleazy self.  The show is playing the character too much on the fence about him being decent vs. evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Chanel is keen on Holly because of her crush on Johnny.

Holly is kinda dumb, IMO.  She doesn't have any street smarts and trust too many people.

And, yes, everyone calling Holly's "Aunt Sarah" is obnoxious.  Like most of us watch everyday.  We don't need the familial reminders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What's the age difference in actors between Johnny and Tate? 

Because I was just thinking about how the characters must have lived in Los Angeles at the same time for part of the past decade, while Theresa and Sami both lived there.  And given that Kim is Sami's Aunt, you'd think they would hang out at holidays when the boys were home from school.  So, it's odd that they never have scenes together.  In fact, I don't recall them interacting hardly at all since Tate arrived.

But, I wonder if they keep them apart, in part, because they look the same age.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For Tate, I think it was the combination of the acting and the writing. Having Tate still be so carefree when Theresa was carted off to prison was a mistake. 
And this week when he confronted Holly and mentioned how his mother’s in prison and now Holly wants his father to go there too, that was on Leo Howard 

For Holly, I understand her actions. She’s projecting. She’s angry that Eric can’t be punished for his crime, so she’s transferring that anger onto somebody who can be punished for their crime

They don’t know what to make him. They have the same problem with Kristen, Gabi and Stefan.

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed

I was thinking about how when Jennifer Horton was a teen, one of her early conflicts was worrying about the genetic aspects of Laura's mental illness, and if it would be passed on to her or her children. 

It seems like worrying about his relationship with drugs and alcohol should be the central conflict for Tate.  Rather than how he's going to live in a cabin all summer so he doesn't have to go to camp (another plot that we'll forget in two months).

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me, it is not as noticeable when Tate is in a scene with Brady, because Leo Howard is smaller in stature than Eric Martsolf (53).  And look like they could be plausibly related.  But, I could imagine a conversation amongst production where they've tried to separate Johnny and Tate because they look like contemporaries. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I love many things about BTG very much. For me, it's greatest strength is how the family relationships are so beautifully written. The deep love between family members while acknowledging each other's flaws--it's SO GOOD.  The best of the best is the two sister relationships: loving but very different sisters Dani and Nicole and adversarial sisters Kat and Eva. These two relationships can anchor the show for many years to come, in my opinion. (The one caveat is that the young and very talented Colby and Ambyr may want to leave the show sooner rather than later, but that's to be expected). My biggest problem with this show is this: Where are the romantic love stories? Where are the star-crossed lovers? Almost every character on this show is married, or in a committed relationship, or just fooling around. Right now the only potential for this are in the Ashley/Andre/Derek and Kat/Tomas/Eva situations. Like a lot of people, I feel the sooner they ditch Ashley and Derek, the better. I hate picking on actors, but the characters are so blah and bland it's like they're a parody of soap characters. I like Andre, and there's some indication they might have him become more serious about Dani, but I don't see that becoming a big love story. I could be wrong. Kat and Eva fighting over a man would be amazing. Over Tomas? No.  I've noticed on social media some people are starting to ship Kat and Jacob. I think that shows how much viewers long for a messy love story. There is much I enjoy about BTG and I have no intention of bailing on it. But over all my many years of watching soap operas, the thing that always got me the most excited about them was the question: "When are those two finally going to get together?"
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 11/26/73-11/30/73 & 12/3/73-12/7/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy