Jump to content

GH: July 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 777
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Taggert seems to have been completely forgotten. I hope it's not due to Real's health. The show has moved away from the black characters in general. 

The Pikeman story feels like one of those plots they just stall out to eat up time with having to churn out 5 episodes a week. I don't think anyone involved knows or cares what's going on. And being stuck in the quagmire of the story is probably a big reason why Mulcahey never even got a proper chance.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Today is Marcus Taggert MIA Day #260, that is counting only M-F of course, on a real calendar & that adds up to more than a year. Taggert is only cared about by a handful of fans, no one else. As I understand it, Real is fine, so it's not some worrying health condition. Thankfully. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is my question.  Karen and Stone have been dead for decades.  Is it possible for Jagger to still be grieving?  Sure?  But it's not playing out how it happened on screen.  Jagger did not show up for Stone's last days or funeral.  Jagger had cheated on Karen and long been divorced for her when she died.   If the show framed it as regret more so than a vendetta I could get it.  The show is acting like Jagger has a leg to stand on with the Karen/Stone stuff in regards to Sonny.  He doesn't.  Sonny had nothing to do with either of those deaths.  If Jagger just hated Sonny because he was a criminal that's great.  He is, but the show is trying to tell me Sonny wronged Jagger which he did not in the entire scheme of things.

If you are going to bring back a character from 30 years ago you might try to make it relevant to current day.  Without Robin, Brenda, Karen, AJ, Ruby, Jason with a memory, etc.  he's just talking to people like Lois and pretending like they knew one another.  No one on canvas currently outside of Sonny was connected to Jagger at all.

It's like Jagger is making up this narrative that Sonny is awful-and I agree, but Sonny is denying this.  No one on the show has really lived the Sonny/Karen/Jagger/Stone/Brenda drama so there's no objective middle in the whole situation.  They both suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hopefully, Gio is turning down the job offer for Trina and not that blonde dog in heat. 

Willow/Drew/Nina is the best storyline on GH right now and also has the most potential to have tremendous ripples effects on the canvas and they would be really stupid if they didn’t run with it as much as they could. 

As for Anna, I wonder if any real life law enforcement officials ever helped out a crime boss for the sake of their children

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm pretty sure the idea of making Valentin the head of Pikeman (which did track with the original story developments) was PM's. It put a character beloved by the previous creative regime and the current EP (Frank) in an untenable and possibly irredeemable position. I believe Mulcahey also wrote the key reveal episodes with Valentin and Brennan himself. It was good work. At that point, with Ava discovering Sonny's meds were tampered with and keeping quiet and Valentin in turn discovering Ava had found out, it seemed as though the show was on course for the two of them to link up and conspire together for their mutual interests. Then it went on ice, probably in part due to FV's guarantee shuffle and probably also due to creative strife BTS, and then things changed.

That's all been flushed now: Sonny has suddenly remembered he should hate Ava and is overall behaving much more reasonably and kindly all over town, the newly-estranged Kristina and Dante have leapt back to their father's side yet again (after those wonderful scenes with DZ cutting him out after the wedding fiasco with Dex) over the fuckin' Natalia recording of all things, Ava is out of the penthouse and has no real place in the conspiracy. On one hand I am actually glad the show is finally remembering Ava is not some nice person for Sonny and co. to be buddy-buddy with, and I'm glad they're bringing up Connie, etc. It's important not to lose sight of what she is. But right now she comes off as a bumbling cartoon. The setup PM inherited with Sonny and Ava at the penthouse, which he turned into Ava becoming the Iago whispering poison in his ear, made sense because she'd done it before and was on track to go somewhere interesting IMO. Now it's back to Good Sonny and the world vs. Ava, which is boring to me. And meanwhile the wretched Charlotte is suddenly back from limbo to make us weep for Valentin and Anna's love. Nor do I think Willow/Drew/Nina will last much longer, which is a shame bc the big political rollout eps with Drew Q around the Fourth of July, with the town watching the press conference, etc. and a lot of umbrella reaction stuff was solid IMO. I do think that unlike Blake/Ross/Holly, the mother (Nina) was to be the endgame but who knows. Given the way things are going now with the sudden 180 on the story I am def down for a Ryan's Hope-type scenario. I just think it's such a waste of potential, because Watros, Cameron and even Katelyn MacMullen are doing solid work. Old fashioned soap.

Don't get me started on the handling of Natalia again BTW. It's disgusting and it's about FV wanting to hire and then wanting to keep another big soap star - nothing else.

I don't think Wagger is relevant either. I don't think bringing Karen back has any purpose (Scott has other daughters). Wagger had a handful of good scenes when PM came in to write. What has he had since? Nothing. Wagger was just another 'give us brownie points for bringing back an old character' hire by FV before the HW change in March, and now he does nothing. I'm not gonna squee and fanboy out every time they pull out some old name from the GH Wiki for a mid recast.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right - Mulcahey did what he could to add some flavors to the whole Pikeman mess and the longstanding issue of how spent and confused characters like Sonny and Ava feel. I do get why viewers weren't thrilled, especially as Mulcahey was likely being sabotaged, but the lack of patience from a lot of people seemed to doom any real change from the outset. And now we're just back to what people said they disliked before he got there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the worst thing they can ever do with Ava is domesticate her. The problem is that is where she has languished for a number of years until recently - for a number of years under D&C she was inexplicably getting along fine with Sonny, with Carly and many others, breaking bread and socializing away. They were treating her civilly or even with friendship. That makes zero sense given their history. Ava is a power broker and at core a vicious criminal. So is Sonny, but he has longtime cachet with the town she never had. Ava's power base and social base is a select swath of the town.

The other problem is the audience, which cries foul when Valentin turns bad, or when Ava breaks bad again or torpedoes her inexplicable relationships on the canvas, like the odd friendship with Nina (who had a grudge with her going back to Silas Clay and her pregnancy and coma in the '90s). They want nothing bad to happen to their favorites or nothing to change, and then they call it ruining the character. This is who Ava came on GH as - Ron Carlivati had her gunning down Connie and letting her choke to death on her own blood on the floor of what is now Nina's office because a) he has no sense of long-term proportion and b) they never thought Ava would turn out to be a lifer, when Maura was only supposed to do first a few days on the show and then maybe a few months. But a lot of people say she's changed and it's character assassination. It isn't IMO.

What is problematic is the current story, where Ava is bumbling about with rinky-dink schemes like the Natalia recording which are small potatoes while Sonny is acting like she blew up another one of his kids. That's not the level any of this should be pitched at, nor should Ava be in the hot seat over what Natalia said. Ava should be making a whole different league of trouble.

The Sonny/Nina, etc. fans wailing about Drew and Willow, etc. I have no time for. At least a fair amount of the audience finally admitted the Drew/Willow kiss and the Nina FWB relationship was proper soap and are mourning its quick dismissal.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jagger is not relevant.  And if you want to bring him back that's fine.  Whatever.  No one was asking, but his slanted skew on why he hates Sonny is weird.  Jagger can hate Sonny and Jason because they are literal criminals, but bringing up past crap to characters that have no idea who Stone or Karen are is just obnoxious and weird.  I know it's HISTORY! and it's being honored in Frank's mind, but none of this bs is actually what happened besides Sonny abusing an underage Karen.  And Jagger isn't even the victim here.  Karen was and forgave Sonny a million years ago.  Jagger can be mad about it, but in essence he was banging Brenda while his traumatized true love started stripping, doing drugs, and hooking up with Sonny while Jagger was all "Karen's being weird" and didn't do much else lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Good point. It would provide some conflict with Jack. As much as I am not interested in Claire, I don't find it difficult to understand why she might be a bit reluctant  to commit to a guy who has already been divorced twice or is  3 times?before he is 30. That's a natural obstacle that Claire would be hesitant about. But in GC every relationship is true love and various past marriages are forgotten.
    • He had no chance getting on The Sopranos

      Please register in order to view this content

      I’m in NYC, and I can’t help but wonder if NYC prosecutors, politicians, etc. ever felt the way that Laura did, back in the 80s-90s when they were trying to take down the mob.  “Oooh, don’t put John Gotti in prison. The guy who comes in after him might be worse” 
    • Happy 18th Birthday, Sophia! I like that Tate gave her a birthday party. And that Marlena counseled him about whether or not he has feelings for Sophia, and his relationship with Holly. I like how messy Tate is and I hope he continues to be messy. He just needs to have more argument/fight scenes with Doug III

      Please register in order to view this content

      Days just needs to work a little bit more on establishing better chemistry between Tate and Sophia, but I still think that’s mostly due to Rachel Boyd. Sometimes, I think that Sophia might secretly be scheming, but with the way RB plays it, (if that’s what they’re going for), it doesn’t seem to be working. Tate was also really sweet and dorky during the party too The drug scenes didn’t do much for me though. I don’t mind that Kevin panicked and ran off with the drug once he heard Steve and Shawn coming, but I felt like that story was the weakest part of today. But I am interested in seeing what happens next. And I couldn’t help but laugh when I noticed that Steve and Shawn had matching jackets Btw, I see Mayor Price established a quid pro quo with Xander today lol I wouldn’t mind that being more than just a plot point. It could lead to some pretty good drama if it’s handled correctly. And it would be a lot better than Xander declaring war on Sweet Bits/Chanel and Felicity.  And Stephanie, finally having her mother to confide in about her life, her relationship with Alex, etc. has been one of the best things about the Paula/Jeanne episodes. The book thing still seems very Ron/Jamey-like though, mostly because it’s so centered around Alex, sort of like how GH used to make storylines about Liz all about Finn or Franco Hopefully, Stephanie talks to Kayla about the book. I’d like to hear more of her perspective on it. I also like that Kayla and Marlena were there for each other as well. These are such better ways to use all three of them. And, we got an update about John One other thing I’ve noticed about the Paula/Jeanne episodes (except for the ones that are worked on by Jamey) is that they’re longer than Ron episodes. Episodes usually clock in at around 40-41 minutes now, as opposed to 35-37, or as short as 31. I like that. 
    • Also Victor being the obstacle for Kyle/Claire feels forced. If anything it should be Diane. Diane has a history of having issues with the Newmans, doesn’t she? Jack could be the one trying to reel her in while she’s meddling in Kyle and Claire’s relationship. They’re making the characters of Diane, Victoria, Nick, Sharon be way too complacent when they could have a stronger role in the younger characters like Mariah/Tessa, Kyle/Claire etc 
    • A year later we had these ratings for the week of May 11-17 1987. This was probably the last time the CBS soaps (at least til Dallas’ finale) ranked this high. Dynasty had already ended its season.  CBS reran the Dallas Early Years movie on Saturday night against Golden Girls’ season finale, which was the failed Empty Nest back door pilot.  Interestingly a repeat Family Ties was #1 this week. The week before the season finale of Family Ties beat out Cosby as well, but it was Cheers that beat them both out with Diane’s exit.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hello to everybody!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm writing a series of essays about the first time of a LGBT character in US soaps. I already have datas about Sharon Duvall in DAYS (1977) as first Bisex, Lynn Carson in AMC (1983) as first Lesbian, Hank Elliott on ATWT (1989) as first Gay (someone have or can find the episode in which Paul Ryan finds out about Hank and does not take it very well? I have seen Hank's coming out to Iva and when Hank gets a bullet to save Paul's life from the latter evil father and when he gets tested for HIV after finding out Charlie's diagnosis, but Soap Opera Digest recaps are too much concises...) and Billy Douglas on OLTL (1992) as first LGBT teen in both daytime and primetime TV (I have seen all the episodes on You Tube. BTW, what a great storyline, why it was ignored by the Emmys? Andrew Carpenter and Billy's father players are both really great in their roles! Oh, well, if OLTL was not nominated for Best Drama in 1994 with Marty's gang rape story which won four major awards and was spectacular, no surprise at all - sadly) and I have read something about Azure in The City (1996) as first Trans, but I'd like to see the episode where Bernado finds out and Azure confirms what is said in that newspaper to have something to quote. I like quoting, it gives the essays more depth. I already read the biweekly recaps from Soap Opera Digest on Tumblr and single episodes recaps on IMDB, but I'd like to have more to write about. And something more about critics and public opinions - I only knows that the storyline was rapidly axed because of bad writing and bad performance by Carlotta Chung, but I have nothing to quote.   PS Thank you @JAS0N47 for your incredible and rich site (and work on it). In particular for the Nielsen ratings on weekly basis lists since 1974 and for everything about Sharon Duval - specially for the script of the confession episode dated 23 May 1977! I'm not a DAYS viewers (I'm Italian, I live in Italy and on You Tube there is almost nothing if not short videos), but I've seen some clips of Marlena's first possession (Deidre Hall is terrific in it! Storyline is garbage, but it has its chilling moments and it is funny - I laugh everytime I remember Kristen say to Marlena "according to the book of demonology"! Was she an espert of demons or what!? ) and read on Soap Opera Central daily recaps about infamous Melaswen (brainwashed Marlena has a particular sense of humor - killing ex alcoholic Maggie with a bottle of wine and Alice with her donuts...), so I know something about the soap. Little, but better than nothing.
    • May 14, Asher Antonyzyn (Danny) interview

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm curious the motivation for keeping Bela on beyond the circus story arc.  Did he play a character like his character on EON, or was he more of a good guy? I know he ended up with Sunny at the end of the series, but I always thought that Sunny/Hogan could have been revived once the lack of chemistry between him and the NuLiza became apparent.   Actually... the NuLiza (Louan Gideon) reminded me more of Sunny than she did Liza as played by Sherry... and she just threw off the whole vibe of the show. I see Estelle has just arrived in the late October 1985 episodes, which only means that Wendy and Stephanie are soon on their way out.   It also appears that the Sarah/Quinn/Wendy triangle was set up by Mayer.. and it looks as though Tomlin is going to deactivate it by the introduction of Colleen Dion's character.   I don't understand why no one on the show thought to look at Quinn and realize that he was the problem and write him out.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy