Jump to content

B&B June 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Mamma mia, here we go again.

Please register in order to view this content

 

I guess Bradley's been reading my posts.

Next step will be a sex scandal with Hollis.

 

 

 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

-- PLEASE give us a Brooke/Hollis se scandal!

-- That "Brooke retrospective" made me LOL. All that production for 3 outfits.

-- Also hilarious? Hope being in love with yet ANOTHER man after talking to him for 5 minutes. Wasn't she just madly in love with Thomas? The girl gets dickmatized easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bradley owes us this Brooke/Hollis scandal. Ridge should be sorry for ever making that offer to her and uttering the word LINGERIE. She said Yes, so fast! LOL. Also is Brooke going to set some records - 62 year old face of a lingerie line! Work it, KKL - you still got it! I so hope this is a turn to the better and more trashy Bold and away from toes, mints and staplers. And I beg Bradley to give us the Hollis drama. 

 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

YES. YES. YES. YES. AND YES. AMEN. I got excited just reading this. And if Bradley is going to push it... and have her in bra and panties on stage in her mid 60s, why not even get pregnant by the wrong man again. Finn can deliver it in Big Bear! 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Brooke's Bedroom Line is coming back?  Steffy was speechless, I think on some level she doesn't think it is a bad idea. KKL is no spring chicken, let's see if this 60-something woman can still pull off lingerie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I recently watched another interview with KB in which she again repeated that same lie that she had no idea she was coming back and that she went to another town and bought property and etc... all while we had SEEN that scene where it was mentioned Sheila was meeting with a friend WAY before Sugar was killed off. Please don't tell me that Kimberlin Brown did not guess what that meant. We, the fans, guessed it as it was happening, but the actress that played that role for 35 years DIDN'T. Give me a break.

And her version that Bradley re-wrote everything because the fans wanted her back... is ludicrous... because we have clear proof that it was written in the script that she was meeting Sugar before she was killed off. There is definitive proof of that in the show and they can't erase that scene. I could lie better when I was 7. Bradley and Kimberlin should really try better next time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://x.com/MicheleValJean/status/1919575319146856657  
    • The penthouse was my favorite set... and it changed hands from Margo to Draper/April to Miles/Nicole then to just Miles... before he opted to give that beautiful place for that drab house with the even more drab Beth.  That was a jump the shark moment for me LOL
    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.   Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse.  Each of the sets is completely different.  And their budget was like zero, lol.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
    • Today, was a fantastic episode. I loved everything about, including Ainta singing, Amazing Grace. I love the family dynamic of the Dupree's so much. They remind me of my own family at times. Martin & Smitty have come leaps and bounds from where they  started. I genuinely felt a connection between them I can't wait to watch it deepen. Dana/Leslie/Sherry/Ana is a piece of work. Her speech at the Dupree's about her "concern" for Eva and then locking her out of their apartment??? She is pure evil, but I love it. I can't wait to see where the Eva/Kat story goes. There's so much potential there. As for Ted, I need to see Keith Robinson in the role before giving my true critique of Maurice Johnson.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy