Jump to content

April 3-7, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is the only board I've come across where posters are still defending the crap JER is serving up. The vast majority are fed up with the show and the pathetic ratings reflect that. I've seen Higley bashed from pillar to post on this board but her soap is neck and neck with DAYS on the season (with a smaller viewership base too).

Why the hell would people be enjoying the show right now? There's no romance, no adventure, no meaningful characterisation. Instead, there's cheap sex, characters behaving like morons to further the plot and storylines from a decade ago behind rehashed.

I most certainly DON'T want Days cancelled, but the show is sleeping-walking in that direction with this destructive hack at the helm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know. Pretty amazing.

Px, using your own specified period proves nothing. I can say that in 2002 the couples were together more often than not, and the ratings were much higher than they are now. It means nothing.

The real problem is JER and his horrible writing. I say they were just lucky on Monday and Friday, and the show is still in JER's ratings average slump of 2.4-2.6 which is about .2 below Higley's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sadly true. This is a new HH ratings low for GL.

I can only hope that the Total Viewers numbers aren't as bad...I've come to realize that Total Viewers is probably the more important number for all of the soaps. This is especially true for GL, which airs in both the morning and the afternoon. I surmise that there are more people watching television in the mornings (Today, Dr. Phil, Regis, etc.) and that is why GL gets Total Viewers numbers very close to other shows (AMC, OLTL) but has HH numbers far lower. GL and OLTL, for example, get both have 2.8 million viewers on the same day, but GL would have say, 2.3 and OLTL a 2.6 simply because the viewer pool is larger in the mornings, where GL airs in many cities. That 2.8 million is a smaller percentage of the folks watching TV in the mornings.

Does that make any sense to those 'in the know' or am I reading things wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OL can't be happy with their ratings. The last two weeks have had some pretty big moments that they've been building to for ages in both the DID story and Todd's story and yet they are still at 2.5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the problem is that they waited too long. I know many I have talked too who have waited so long that they lost interest by the time the reveals came around.

I know for me I waited on them and am still watching but we waited so long esp on the DID reveal that it just doesn't seem all that bad too me. The story had no punch for me. The only thing good about it was the performances but even they didn't anything for the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is at least a segment of fans thath say this about every single soap. They all do a lot of the same mistakes - casting models instead of actors, rewriting history, recasting characters and giving them new personalities, insulting our intelligence on a daily basis. They're all guilty to varying degrees. The soaps need a saviour to come get them back on track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

As the leader of the James E. Reilly Alliance, I've brainwashed some people here. ;) Happy to see SON as the only pro DAYS place. :)

Glad to see DAYS rebound from last week and doing better than last year.

I guess no new low for that "horrible" week like some people were predictiing. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How are the ratings pathectic? DAYS is the #1 Soap in 18-24 & 18-34, It's the #3 soap in 18-49 demos. It's getting more viewers in EVERY category compared to last year. So I wouldn't call them pathetic. DAYS should be praised for being one of the few soap doing better than last year.

Again, How is the show that bad? I guess the internet world and real world greatly differ in opinions, because people I talk to are enjoying the show more now, than they have in years.

Can anyone really admit they would want the old Cheesy/Sci-Fi DAYS back compared to the traditional storylines we are seeing now? There's no supercouples together, but that's part of the ride. They have to find their way back to one another. Call me old fashioned, but I much prefer watching these triangles play out, than have to watch 5 minutes of the woo-woo.

Reilly has always written boring/traditional stuff for a couple months, slowly building up for his famous climaxes. During the next few months when J&J, Bope, Jarlena do find their way back to one another, you can bet it's going to be big.

I Agree Master!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree wherever you sit we as soap fans should be praising a show for getting better numbers than a year ago because over the past few years that doesn't happen to often so its good for DAYS and in turn good for the genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy