Jump to content

Classic Primetime Miniseries - Trashy or Classy?


j swift

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Without turning this into a Roots discussion, although all threads get diverted at some point, I think there are issues that matter in terms of presenting the story as fact versus fiction.

First, Alex Haley lied not only about the oldest generations of his family, but also about the stories of his own grandparents.  He did not complete the research that he described, and borrowed stories from other families.  If he had been honest about the idea that the book was historical fiction, it would have been fine.  However, the controversy arose in part because he did not credit those people who actually had completed scholarly work on the subject.  And the fictionalization allowed feeble-minded conspiracy theorists fodder to say that slavery was less popular than written about in the book.

Second, personally, I've always felt that by only portraying slave owners are vicious cruel people, it excuses the majority from guilt.  It is an excuse for White people watching to think, that we would not have been involved in the slave trade because some people don't have a propensity for physical assault.  Whereas the reality was that it was much more systemic which has led to the economic disparity we see today.  All slave owners weren't wealthy vile men, some were middle class and lacked the morals to understand that slavery is wrong.  In fact, I think it is far more frightening to depict relatable farmers owning people like they owned animals, than allowing a modern day audience an excuse for why they have no culpability for systemic racism.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Oh, I *loved* watching "Poor Little Rich Girl: The Barbara Hutton Story" as a kid.  I still think it's some of the best work Farrah Fawcett ever did (critics be damned, lol).

Sidney Sheldon ALWAYS gave good miniseries.  Judith Krantz, too.

"Deceptions" played like the recipe for a perfectly trashy '80's miniseries.  Take one Stefanie Powers and one Barry Bostwick, add 2-3 internationally famous co-stars (Jeremy Brett!  Gina Lollabrigida!) and an eccentric "comic relief" (Brenda Vaccaro!); throw in a precocious child or two (Jeremy Miller, Fairuza Balk); stir in a preposterous story with a forbidden love element (OMG, the bad twin sister's gonna sleep with the good twin sister's husband!); also, toss in enough jewels and furs to make the characters on DYNASTY look like bums in comparison; simmer for four hours over two nights; and voila!  Just the thing you need to help you forget how much the Reagan administration and Moral Majority are [!@#$%^&*] you over.

Sigh.  I miss the '80's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good to see that we have all the greats of American literature covered, Judith Krantz, Colleen McCullough, Jackie Collins, Danielle Steel, and Barbara Taylor-Bradford.

Please register in order to view this content

While they have been trashy, miniseries were a celebration of female authors. (reminder: the term trashy is purely subjective)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Scruples had significance as the first hit miniseries of the 80's, the first based on a woman author's 'sex and shopping' genre. 

Up until then those old standbys Harold Robbins '79 Park Avenue' and Arthur Hailey 'Wheels' 'The Moneychangers' had been the source for those more 'salacious' entries in the genre.

Scruples001.jpgScruples003.jpgScruples002.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Paul Raven as noted in a prior discussion, the staying power of Scruples was as amazing as the miscasting of Lindsey Wagner.  There's the 1980 version mentioned in your post, then a 1981 TV movie on ABC, a 2012 ABC pilot, and the daytime version developed by John Conboy.  It is the Spider-Man of trashy novels in terms of how many times the origin story has been remade.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@j swiftYes, Scruples had significance from that aspect also. One point to correct is that NBC's daytime Scruples (which came very close to making it to air) did not have John Conboy involved as he was working on Capitol at the time.

Doris Quinlan was the EP mentioned.

Her follow up Princess Daisy was aired on NBC but Mistral's Daughter, I'll Take Manhattan,Till We Meet Again and Dazzle all aired on CBS.

Her 1990 novels never got the mini series treatment. She was an 80's lady.

Edited by Paul Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Judith Krantz recycled actors in her miniseries.

Lindsay Wagner - Scruples, Princess Daisy

Barry Bostwick - Scruples, I'll Take Manhattan, Till We Meet Again

Stacy Keach - Princess Daisy, Mistral's Daughter

Robert Urich - Princess Daisy, Mistral's Daughter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know what's the thing I love about Deceptions? It was a deception. Wealthy, "bad" Stefanie Powers just needed the love of good man Barry Bostwick to embrace the middle class lifestyle of "good" Stefanie Powers. A lifestyle that good Stefanie was more than happy to give up ... which meant she had to be punished. Talk about encouraging your audience not to dream too high!

I was saying this to friends about a week ago, one of the biggest disadvantages to Hollywood Wives the movie is that the mystery sustained throughout the book (that Deke & Buddy are identical twins) obviously has to be solved early on. I am curious how a Hollywood Husbands miniseries circa 1987 (Jackie even had a character unmistakably based on Sister Dearest!), or Hollywood Kids ~1996 (which I remember having an obvious Tori Spelling analogue) would have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"And if watching Suzanne Somers and Anthony Hopkins give into their lust for each other as he chokes her is your thing - well, just come and knock on OUR door, Clarice, 'cuz this miniseries has been waiting for you!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Deceptions aired in  May 85 and was based on a Judith Michael novel. Pt 1 ranked #4 for the week Sunday 9-11 beating Crazy Like Fox/trapper John on CBS and rerun of Indianpolis 500 on ABC.

Part 2 was #2 for the week airing the following night. Despite that success I don't think any more Michael novels were adapted for TV

decptionscover%20(3).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • No idea if this one had ever been up before or what the exact date is, but it's always good to look at/save the new AMC content while you can. If you're here for the drama there is some delirium with Adam and Erica about 10-12 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

      @Vee @Jonathan @Maxim @All My Shadows @alwaysAMC @Contessa Donatella @Soaplovers @DemetriKane @dragonflies @AMCOLTLLover @Khan @Paul Raven @slick jones @Wendy @DeeVee @j swift @EricMontreal22 @AmandainNC28655 @Wilsoky @Franko @Liberty City @robbwolff @Soapsuds @soapfan770 @FrenchFan
    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy