Jump to content

GH: December 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yesterday, Lois was amazing! I completely was in thrall with the way they had her put 2 & 2 & another 2 all together & then come out with the absolute truth! 

Juxtaposed with Cyrus revealing himself as the pseudo-priest who heard Nina's confession, such as it was. 

Very excited that Lois is going to drop the veritable dime on Nina, to Sonny! 

Excellent year-end cliffhanger!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 325
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I thought it was a decent cliffhanger.  I couldn't be more over Cyrus if I tried.  He has outlived his usefulness so long ago.  I can't stand the way JK speaks his lines and the whole thing was a massive breach of Nina's privacy.  And I hate Nina.

The Lois stuff was good with Sonny.  Instead of sitting and chatting with Olivia I do wish she was a little more in the mix of the Michael/Carly/Ned/Sonny argument.  I just hope no one stops Lois from telling the truth and glad she quickly figured out what apparently no one else in PC could in like 5 mins lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also liked the montage. 

Plus, the scenes with #Sprina were of the best kind. The idea of taking Taby offscreen while NAC is making Ryan Murphy's movie is a great idea!

AND! Heather & Esme, yes, indeed, I was pleased, very very pleased. With Heather Esme could admit what we've seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I appreciate anything that remembers Lois has a brain, and that she is nothing if not loyal. I know this is just a stopgap appearance, but since she wasn’t in major story this is a return that hasn’t really let me down. She seems like Lois, in character and present. My only complaint, and we have discussed it before, is that Vanessa isn’t here too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess my question is why not put her in a major story?  I don't expect her to run the canvas in the way the Brenda's returns tend to do, but more integration with the players of this SEC stuff would have helped.  I agree she's not written out of character, but she also really isn't doing much.  And unless Rena is completely against returning in a larger role this doesn't have to be a stopgap appearance.  Even if it is there was a chance to integrate her with more of the cast so the next time she returns she fits better on the canvas.

I mean 99% of my GH complaints are the fact Vanessa isn't here 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe Vanessa said the show reached out to her for the 60th in a minor role.   So perhaps Frank might want her for a cameo and buzz, but nothing substantial.  And I can see her rejecting it on that alone.  I think the days of GH begging Vanessa to return are long over and it might be an ego thing on her part.  At the same time her latest returns have been lackluster so I could see the fact it's not a slam dunk ratings winner.  I do think Vanessa is someone who knows her worth, but her worth might also be not as much as she thinks it is anymore.  

I personally think she brings enough hype and fanbase to make it worth it for the show.  I don't think Frank sees it the same way though.  I also don't think GH would ever go off the air without featuring Brenda in some capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I think we know there are lapsed fans who would tune in just to see Brenda in Port Charles again. Now that wouldn't mean they'd tune in again the next Brenda-less week. No, they'd go right back to lapsing. But, "The Return of Brenda" would give them something to promote like nothing else could!

Errol Lewis of SON says that most of these superstars from the past expect a big fee, so if that's so they may be pricing themselves right out of the market. When they were regulars soaps didn't operate on hardship budgets. So their expectations may be too rich for today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think Vanessa is one of the few people who could demand a big fee.  Even if her last returns weren't as great as the previous ones-the Sonny/Brenda wedding had big numbers.   I think in theory she definitely has the body of work to back that up and you could easily cut 5 or 6 GH cast members to make it work and nobody would miss Easton, Cyrus, Diane, Chase's dad, just to name a few.  That would easily cover Vanessa's cost, but that's totally up to Frank and how he wants to use his budget.  Brenda just isn't a priority and I think that's Frank's preference as opposed to the overall audience preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy