Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

100% this. High quality writing and acting will always triumph over any big money set design/wardrobe/music.

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

If you didn't see it I think it would seem impossible that he had Doug & Julie want so badly to be together but repeatedly be out of synch with each other's availability. Julie was with David so Doug was with Addie. Then Julie was free but Doug was with Addie. Then it was just shampoo/rinse/repeat over & over with them getting a spare weekend to an island every other time possible. And he created the first supercouple with that formula. 

Posted

Oops. My bad. 

 

And some say Steve & Alice. It is something that lots of fun conversations can be had about. And, Penny & Jeff definitely have the chronological advantage! 

What I'm going on with Doug & Julie is the first mention in media. 

 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

And I would count myself among those some.  (When grown folks are dressing up for your TV wedding like they're going to a real one, you're a supercouple).

Edited by Khan
Posted

I'm quite capable of being a true historian of soaps & using the first mention by media as my basis. I also fully acknowledge ATWT's Penny & Jeff's chronological advantage but what if the first coinage of the term is the Time 1976 cover & article? Then calling them a supercouple is a read-back. They couldn't be the first if the term didn't exist yet. 

But in point of fact I am not too concerned with who is right on this issue. Except for what I believe is the first use of the term being my basis, I'm pretty fluid. And, I also am not calling out anyone's status as a "true soap historian" into question. I think that's just being inflammatory rather than conversational. 

  • Members
Posted

I wasn't referring to anyone on this message board, I was referring to professional soap historians who have written books, numerous articles, taught classes, etc.  That's why I used the word "true."  Maybe I should have used the term "professional."  And I do still believe that any professional historian of soap operas would likely agree that Penny and Jeff were daytime's first super-couple.  But like most things I post, that is my opinion only.   

  • Members
Posted

Which do you think are his BEST characters.

I would say. From Bold... ranking for originality...

1. Stephanie

2.Sally Spectra

3.Sheila

4.Clark

5.Brooke

6.Caroline

7.Taylor - especially early Taylor

8.Deveney Dixon

 

Posted

Susan Flannery got the part of Stephanie Forrester on the new half hour soap on CBS, THE BOLD & THE BEAUTIFUL, and in its first review she got the only good line. "What was strikingly original from the start was the performance of Susan Flannery as Stephanie Forrester - a fascinating alabaster sphinx of a woman."

 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

The more I watch old clips of Jaime Lyn Bauer as Lorie and read about Lorie's years in Genoa City, the more I'm convinced Lorie was Bell's all-time best creation.  Simply put, she was a character who worked in so many different ways.  You had the sibling rivalry with Leslie that also fed into a triangle with Brad Eliot, the generational conflicts with Stuart and Jennifer, the revelation of her true bio dad and near-incest with Bruce Henderson, the star-crossed love with Lance, the triangle with Lance and Lucas, the QUADRANGLE with Lance, Lucas AND Leslie, the custody drama over Brooks, the "mother-in-law from hell" psychodrama with Vanessa, the corporate intrigue (mixed with sexual attraction) with Victor....  I mean, that girl had her feet in so many different kinds of storylines; yet, Bell never lost track of who she was at her core, and she remained a sympathetic character throughout all of it.

I would add Lorie, Jill and Drucilla to that list.

Edited by Khan
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Belle is indeed named after Isabella. It was Roman's idea. Courtesy the Oct. 22, 1993 synopsis found on Jason's site: "Roman suggests to Marlena that they call the baby Isabella and Marlena agrees. Sami isn't too happy when she overhears it but when they ask John he loves the idea. They toast to Isabella Brady."
    • Engaging for a moment with the topic with titan, Jill is a skilled line producer who maneuvered herself well and leveraged key veterans at various shows for maximized award potential even with lousy stories or taste. But she's never been the creative she fancied herself to be without talented writers behind her, and as an OLTL fan it was fitting to see her knocked down in power and influence after she nearly destroyed GH, the ABC flagship, in under a year when left to her own devices. (Megan McTavish may be insane but her comments about Jill and having to grudgingly write in Kale Browne three days a week at her behest were funny.) Like a lot of the industry she's got certain skills, but she also has a faded bag of tricks that has been mouldering since 1992. Which is a part of why it was such a hoot to see Jill appear out of the shadows like a leviathan in that video. Of course she's at it again. Who will be the next blonde white chick named Courtney in 2026? Riveting stuff for Gen Z.
    • Kat vs Eva is so complex because this feud goes beyond the typical 'good sister/bad sister' trope employed on soaps.  And the gist of the feud goes back to their father with Kat so insecure over not being the only daughter that she's going to lengths even Eva wouldn't go to in order to remove her sister. Kat is just like her aunt Dani in this regards (i.e. going too far even if in the right).
    • Just to confirm, Belle isn't named for Isabella Toscano, correct?  It would be nuts for John to name his daughter after his dead wife, after he wound up with Marlena, right? For example, I would think it uncouth if Joe Biden named a child he had with Jill Biden, after his first wife Neilia, who died tragically.

      Please register in order to view this content

      I was reading her wiki, when the thought came to mind.  But, I also have a vague memory that Belle was named after Beauty and the Beast's Belle, or some other lore. And Rachel's named after Kristen's mother, so this seems wrong.
    • I was thisclose to taking Kat's side today because of all that unnecessary bashing from Martin and Eva... but then Kat just had to open her mouth to Eva 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Because Kay Alden (a female writer living in Chicago who had a big crush on Eric Braeden) wanted to write some scenes for Lori Brooks (a female writer living in Chicago who had a big crush on Victor).  The whole storyline was self-indulgent and foolish.  
    •  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Shouldn't this really be Bold opening?

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • -- Jesus, that was bad. -- If we're going to bash Will's face-making, we can't let Luna off the hook. All that scrunched-face crying was annoying. -- Still no explanation as to how Luna escape, leading to utter stupidity that she gets away AGAIN while Will just stands there. -- Meanwhile, the entire cast hilariously gets texts about the jail escape and heads to the beach house. 

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy