Jump to content

Batman: Brave and the Bold


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Administrator

I doubt the box office of The Flash will have anything to do if Andy leaves.  James Gunn chose Andy for this project knowing what the box office projection was going to be.  I'm willing to give Andy another chance because The Flash went through so many regime changes/delays, and the star of the movie was so problematic that they (Ezra) couldn't promote the movie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When movies flop, people get cut. Zaslav insisted The Flash would succeed up to the day it released.

DC has had a dozen projects they swore they'd make with directors they claimed to love. None happened. Muschietti is as likely to be a casualty as anyone else.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

So why make the announcement the day before the movie was being released?  Why not just wait to officially make the deal with Andy?  To me that says, Zaslav/Gunn both made the decision no matter what was going to happen at the box office.  They both loved The Flash, so they were both on board with it creatively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not only did the ‘The Flash’ flop it actually delivered LOWER than what WB ultimately had to admit to what they were projecting. That is never good.

DC is a damaged brand and this is the third consecutive box office flop in a row that’s lost WB money. Yes, Gunn and Safran are rebooting the entire cinematic universe in 2025 anyway - but there is so much to overcome and these financial and critical losses are putting their reboot in a hard spot and not setting them up for success. Muschietti is ultimately the most expendable one if someone has to be a casualty for this expensive flop.

With its roaster of characters, DC should be a stronger brand than it is. Unfortunately, so many stupid decisions keep being made with this IP that continues to devalue it.

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

PR bluster. Trying to keep up the confidence and not turn audiences away in opening weekend thinking the movie is doomed. Happens all the time. Don't be shocked to see Muschietti quietly released in the next year.

As sad as it is for that cast and crew, it makes me get why Batgirl was shelved - Blue Beetle looks like a cable TV movie/straight to Netflix dump. If Batgirl looked the same neither should've come out IMO, at least not theatrically. What's sad is those are all great characters, especially Jaime Reyes' Blue Beetle. Flash should've been shelved. And I don't give a shít about Aquaman and I suspect it will bomb too.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I disagree.  I don't think you make a commitment to a director to give confidence to a movie, especially to a movie that's not "yours" (Gunn's, Zaslav's).  But we'll see who will be right. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They didn't just do it to boost The Flash, but the announcement was timed to make it seem like they were super confident in that movie and to try to direct its box office. They may like Muschietti, but a flop is a flop and he would only be the millionth director to get quietly cut after a box office failure. His name is now attached to a particularly disastrous chapter in an already bad cinematic history for their franchise and unless It: Chapter Three miraculously materializes in the next few years it will be the first thing people think of re: Muschietti. He's a provisional name they can slot in there, but if the movie actually happens I don't think he'll be the one making it. This kind of revolving door stuff happens everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When Gunn made this announcement, I don’t think he anticipated ‘The Flash’ would come in lower than what WB’s internal projections were.

The PR machine had been in full steam to promote ‘The Flash.’ Zaslav had been non-stop about that when the movie proved too costly for him to possibly forego its theatrical release and with Ezra’s issues preventing him from promoting the film. Hence why you saw stuff like Gunn suddenly proclaiming in the press that it was “the best comic book movie I’ve ever seen!” and why they paid Tom Cruise’s management team to say he saw the movie and thought it was one of the best films he’d seen in recent memory. 

Please register in order to view this content

 The PR campaign was a disaster and all of it blew up in their faces as this is one of the costliest flops of the year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @BroderickThank you for the reply. Such acting that they Sharon Gabet and the actor playing Draper still played their relationship after it's over. I picked up on it even though I had no idea about their history. That's such good acting/continuity.  Raven has just moved to London and a custody battle is now brewing for Jamey.
    • Ha-ha-ha, I thought it was Marland who turned Mike into a jerk, but apparently not. I get that they probably felt the Mike/Leslie story had run its course, but they should have at least let them have a kid. Especially since they were soon ensnaring him in a storyline with a woman who couldn't have children (Elizabeth). Of course, no one could have predicted there would be a dearth of Bauers a few years later. I remember this! I remember Holly sitting by the phone, desperate for Ed to call so they could stop the divorce. I forgot it was Rita who never gave him the message. What a bitch. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       But, yeah, this is the Rita I remember at the beginning: very determined to bag Ed. I contend that Holly never, ever got over it, never stopped regretting that the divorce went through. I wish at some point over the years they had let Holly and Ed reunite for more than a brief affair. It feels like a thread that was left hanging. There she is! I was beginning to think I had dreamed up the Rita/Tim/Evie triangle.
    • In the interview posted on knotslanding.net, William Devane described the Greg/Paige storyline as "juvenile".  From that interview I also got the impression that William Devane was on his way out near the end so he wouldn't have returned if there was a season 15.
    • Just started this show. I’m on episode 3. I’m starting to make the connections and understand the family tree better. Still will take time to fully understand everything but it’s exciting. So glad we have a new soap opera in 2025! Excited to join the discussion once I’m caught up.
    • Haley and Jacob had more chemistry in their small interaction than I ever saw between Naomi and Jacob. Same with Haley and Derek actually - that was one of the few times I can recall Derek ever having any life in him. 
    • -- Anita going through Ted and Nicole's wedding album. Really??? -- Dani defending Ted in her conversation with Nicole. Really??? -- Bill wants a child with Hayley. Really??? -- Many people are saying "Dana can't be Eva's mother" because of the way Dana treats her. Maybe she's not her mother, but that biological connection has nothing to do with it. Dana has functioned as Eva's mother all of her life. There's no reason to believe giving birth to her makes the difference. -- Hayley is hilarious for being so clueless and tone deaf when she comments on others' mistakes and flaws. God, she's dumb. -- Alex Alegria continues to suck as Tomas. Soooooo wooden. -- Ambyr Michelle stole the episode.  
    • I was fine with Greg and Paige as a couple (ick factors and all, lol).  What I didn't like was how juvenile their push-and-pull was, with Greg alienating her repeatedly and arbitrarily, and Paige leaving him and/or The Sumner Group in a huff, only to come back together, like, thirty minutes later, lol. I get that Greg was not someone who enjoyed sharing his feelings with others, but c'mon.  He was a little too old for all that on-again/off-again [!@#$%^&*]; and so was Paige, and so were we. Mary Robeson wasn't her aunt, though.  Thanks to WBTV's Primetime Soaps app, I was able to rewatch all of S14, and I learned, in fact, Mary was her aunt - which I guess made Joe her uncle? Truly, I thank the streaming gods for being able to rewatch the final season, because, for the past 30+ years, I never was able to understand how Mary and Joe, Nick and Vanessa, Val's disappearance and Treadwell (and Abby) all fit together; and even now, it still seems a trifle sketchy to me.  (The shortened season and reduced budget wreaked some havoc on the storytelling, did it not, lol?)  But I do appreciate the attempt, because it's probably the first time since Val's pregnancy that the show even attempted to tie the cast together under the same story umbrella. And even if she was trepidatious (sp?) about raising Meg alone, she wasn't the type to express those feelings outwardly.  Laura wasn't going to fidget and cry like Val, or shout wild-eyedly at others like Karen.
    • Oh Lord! They don't dare put her near Jacob. 
    • And knowing Hayley she’d somehow feel like she was the victim

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy