Jump to content

Soaps In Depth Print Magazine to Fold, Will Continue As Online Website


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Webmaster
ABC Soaps In Depth, CBS Soaps In Depth

The print edition of ABC Soaps In Depth and CBS Soaps In Depth will be no more, it was announced today by the magazine’s editor in chief, Dawn Owens.

“I would like to thank you, dear readers of ABC Soaps In Depth and CBS Soaps In Depth, for the years of loyalty and support that you’ve shown our magazines, as the print editions of the magazines will no longer be published,” read a statement from Owens on Twitter.

“You can read up on all things soaps on our website SoapsInDepth.com as well as follow SID on Facebook, Twitter (@soapsindepthabc & @soapsindepthcbs), and Instagram (abcsoapsindepth). I would also like to thank our amazing and talented team for giving their all to put in providing positives, uplifting coverage of the soap world for 24 years. At our hearts, we are all fans of the genre. We laughed, cried and sometimes screamed right along with you at what was happening on our beloved soaps.

“So as the magazines publish their final print issues, on newsstands 4/27 and 5/4, we choose to do it not with tears, but with gratitude — not only to all of you for your decades-long support, but to the wonderful people in our industry who have worked alongside us to bring you soap coverage like no other!”

“You’ve probably heard by now that Soaps In Depth magazine has folded,” said executive editor Richard Simms shortly before the announcement by Owens hit social media. Our last issue will publish on May 4. The news came down suddenly, so we didn’t really have an opportunity to say a proper farewell. I’d like to take a moment to do that now.”

Bauer Xcel Media, which owns both publications, recently revamped the Soaps In Depth website with a look that mimics that of its Woman’s World and First for Women brands.

An NBC Soaps In Depth magazine was shuttered in 1999. It covered “Another World,” “Sunset Beach,” “Passions” and “Days of our Lives.”

CBS Soaps In Depth, which began with coverage of “Guiding Light,” “As The World Turns,” “The Bold and the Beautiful” and “The Young and the Restless,” remained popular with readers as it filled its pages with info on “B&B” and “Y&R” with sprinkles of “DAYS” and “GH” coverage.

ABC Soaps In Depth, which began with coverage of “Port Charles,” “All My Children,” “One Life to Live” and “General Hospital,” was the more popular edition. Since the cancellation of “OLTL,” the magazine’s pages were filled with mostly “GH” related content with some news items featuring “DAYS” and the CBS soaps.

You can read the statement from Owens below as posted on the magazine’s social media handles.

 

The post Soaps In Depth Print Magazine to Fold, Will Continue As Online Website appeared first on Soap Opera Network.

Read More

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

It's sad to see anything fold. They've long been a staple. But never as on par or as popular as SOD or SOW were in their peak. I'm truthfully surprised they stayed around so long as it is. Sorry to see them be so abrubtly ended however and jobs will be lost I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sad to see, for sure. Like KMan101 said, I'm surprised they lasted as long as they did. I wonder how well the ABC circulation was, as GH clearly was a hit even when it was just down to them on ABC. 

 

That would be interesting to see/know... "ratings" for soap magazines during the last 30 years... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Webmaster

 

I'd long thought they should have done that as well. With only thee soaps getting the main coverage it made no sense (to me) to keep them as two separate brands even if they intermixed content for both. For instance, in this week's Soap Opera Digest, you can see how much the magazine's would have been hurt with two of the soaps no longer in production and out of episodes, with one more about to be in the same position in a matter of weeks. Sure, there are some things in there for Y&R/B&B fans, but no spoilers. No real features. Nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
    • It always bothered me from the start that Nicole just took Mona's suggestion and never checked references.  A real psychiatrist would have done more before hiring someone. ** I like that Kat's reporter/investigative type instincts caused her to be suspicious of Eva from the start, and to try to spy on Eva and catch her as weeks went by. However, I think that Kat's so focused on what Eva did wrong -- that she won't see that Leslie is the master manipulator, making some things appear different than they actually are. I hope that Shanice's natural snoopy nature will get her to figure out what actually happened to Laura, and who really caused all the problems. *** edit to add: The show never specified what Mona's job was for Nicole.  Home manager?  Office manager?  Head personal assistant?  I'm sure there would have been a title?    Mona asserted today her upset with Eva and with Leslie.  That they used her and ruined her reputation.  I just wish I knew what Mona's job was. If Mona was an official manager, then it would have made sense for Nicole to trust the recommendation, if Nicole thought Mona had done a proper hiring procedure.  But if Mona is just an informal helper, then why wouldn't Nicole order a background check?
    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
    • Also, someone knocked over the head (usually in the D Mansion) and imprisoned in the secret tunnel room or whatever it was. I swear that must have happened at least a dozen times the last few years, and each time it drove me crazy! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy