Jump to content

Soaps In Depth Print Magazine to Fold, Will Continue As Online Website


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Webmaster
ABC Soaps In Depth, CBS Soaps In Depth

The print edition of ABC Soaps In Depth and CBS Soaps In Depth will be no more, it was announced today by the magazine’s editor in chief, Dawn Owens.

“I would like to thank you, dear readers of ABC Soaps In Depth and CBS Soaps In Depth, for the years of loyalty and support that you’ve shown our magazines, as the print editions of the magazines will no longer be published,” read a statement from Owens on Twitter.

“You can read up on all things soaps on our website SoapsInDepth.com as well as follow SID on Facebook, Twitter (@soapsindepthabc & @soapsindepthcbs), and Instagram (abcsoapsindepth). I would also like to thank our amazing and talented team for giving their all to put in providing positives, uplifting coverage of the soap world for 24 years. At our hearts, we are all fans of the genre. We laughed, cried and sometimes screamed right along with you at what was happening on our beloved soaps.

“So as the magazines publish their final print issues, on newsstands 4/27 and 5/4, we choose to do it not with tears, but with gratitude — not only to all of you for your decades-long support, but to the wonderful people in our industry who have worked alongside us to bring you soap coverage like no other!”

“You’ve probably heard by now that Soaps In Depth magazine has folded,” said executive editor Richard Simms shortly before the announcement by Owens hit social media. Our last issue will publish on May 4. The news came down suddenly, so we didn’t really have an opportunity to say a proper farewell. I’d like to take a moment to do that now.”

Bauer Xcel Media, which owns both publications, recently revamped the Soaps In Depth website with a look that mimics that of its Woman’s World and First for Women brands.

An NBC Soaps In Depth magazine was shuttered in 1999. It covered “Another World,” “Sunset Beach,” “Passions” and “Days of our Lives.”

CBS Soaps In Depth, which began with coverage of “Guiding Light,” “As The World Turns,” “The Bold and the Beautiful” and “The Young and the Restless,” remained popular with readers as it filled its pages with info on “B&B” and “Y&R” with sprinkles of “DAYS” and “GH” coverage.

ABC Soaps In Depth, which began with coverage of “Port Charles,” “All My Children,” “One Life to Live” and “General Hospital,” was the more popular edition. Since the cancellation of “OLTL,” the magazine’s pages were filled with mostly “GH” related content with some news items featuring “DAYS” and the CBS soaps.

You can read the statement from Owens below as posted on the magazine’s social media handles.

 

The post Soaps In Depth Print Magazine to Fold, Will Continue As Online Website appeared first on Soap Opera Network.

Read More

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's sad to see anything fold. They've long been a staple. But never as on par or as popular as SOD or SOW were in their peak. I'm truthfully surprised they stayed around so long as it is. Sorry to see them be so abrubtly ended however and jobs will be lost I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sad to see, for sure. Like KMan101 said, I'm surprised they lasted as long as they did. I wonder how well the ABC circulation was, as GH clearly was a hit even when it was just down to them on ABC. 

 

That would be interesting to see/know... "ratings" for soap magazines during the last 30 years... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Webmaster

 

I'd long thought they should have done that as well. With only thee soaps getting the main coverage it made no sense (to me) to keep them as two separate brands even if they intermixed content for both. For instance, in this week's Soap Opera Digest, you can see how much the magazine's would have been hurt with two of the soaps no longer in production and out of episodes, with one more about to be in the same position in a matter of weeks. Sure, there are some things in there for Y&R/B&B fans, but no spoilers. No real features. Nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy