Jump to content

E.T. The Extraterrestrial REUNION Commercial from XFINITY


dragonflies

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

E.T. was probably just humoring them. 

 

I thought it was a very sweet commercial - one of my relatives asked where Drew Barrymore was, but that probably would have been a very tall order. Even after all these years Henry Thomas still had the right heart for the role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Well, if this ad goes over as well as we all think it might, there's a chance that another ad could be done in the future and perhaps Barrymore could be in that one.  It's fitting though, that this ad is focused on Henry Thomas' character and family.

Please register in order to view this content

at E.T. humoring the lackluster outdated tech that the Earthlings use, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Henry Thomas has been a sturdy, dependable character actor as an adult for years with no IRL drama* and too little notice, but it's his work in Mike Flanagan's stuff like The Haunting of Hill House and his surprise role which shall go unnamed in Doctor Sleep (a role no one would want to fill the shoes of, but he did very well) that prove how impressive he really is. I'm glad he's been getting more props lately.

 

(* - he did have a surprising DUI recently; I hope he's well as he's always seemed low-key and without Hollywood baggage)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'm glad, too.  I admit that I didn't watch "E.T." until I was in my thirties.  When I think of Henry Thomas, however, I think of "Cloak & Dagger," which I LOVED as a kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

...And that's perfectly fine, Khan.

It's not as if Legends of the Fall is Godfather I, II or Network.  At its basic level, it's an aesthetically pleasing, reasonably entertaining, popcorn movie that probably has this effect solely when seen on a big screen.  

The cast and the Western backdrop was mostly what lured me into the cinema.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You might be the only one who's said that to me, lol.

 

It's not that I'm a "film snob," because there are a LOT of BAD movies that I would watch again no matter what.  As the 1980's gave way to the 1990's, however, I just grew bored with movies in general. 

 

On one end, you had the blockbusters, such as "Titanic," that felt hollow and cynical to me -- as if they were more about special effects and promotional tie-ins than they were about storytelling. (Spielberg's stuff was an exception -- although, after "Schindler's List," his movies became more and more ponderous, and boring.)  On the other end, you had the indie films, which my generation in particular made popular ("Clerks" and "Reality Bites" immediately come to mind), but which came off as pretentious and arty.

 

For someone who cut his teeth, so to speak, on MGM musicals from the '30's, '40's and '50's, it gets difficult with every passing year to find a contemporary movie that I actually want to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The good news is, it's gotten worse in the last few years.

 

TBH, after the mid '00s, I just haven't gone out to the movies nearly as much as I used to. These days, I sort of find myself mostly waiting for the movies to come to me and with streaming, it really isn't that difficult to do.  Add to that, "TV" (90% which is on streaming platforms) feels a lot higher in artistic integrity than most of what's being played in the movie theater.  The escalating prices (as with most things) for a ticket don't help matters either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If any of you have time to kill, this block of commercials (there are about 7 I think) has a ton of ET stuff with Sears to coincide with the airing on TV. I was bewildered to see they even had a special where kids could go into their 'portrait studio' to sit on a bike and take a photo with the fake ET on their basket. Were any kids doing that by 1991? 

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hahaha Sorry if I was too negative, I just started typing and typing once I got going hahaha
    • @dc11786 Thanks for taking time to answer my various questions, along with giving your thoughts on the different writing teams. I wonder why they didn't just have Ryder and TR leave together if Jane was going anyway. The discussions over the last few pages have made me more interested in watching these episodes than I have been over the years - without the extra details and analyses provided, these years can be difficult to decipher (not helped by how often Jo seems like a side character).
    • I didn't think this was very good (I've never yet seen a good episode of this revival), but you do get a lot of Michael Stroka. And if you are a Donna Reed Show fan, you also get Paul Petersen.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A very rare, fascinating look at camera blocking in a 1980 episode. Very loose, almost startlingly so (who expects to see Will Vernon with a cig dangling out of his mouth?). @vetsoapfan There's some Jacquie Courtney content in the back half of the video.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Barbara Stock shares memories of her time on Dallas, including that Ken Kercheval was the only cast member she knew outside of the show and that she did not actually realize she was being written out. https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/29593/barbara-stock-spenser-for-hire-dallas-chips-spinoff-doing-know/
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  I concur that this isn't the most interesting material, but I do wish I could see how JoBeth Williams played those trial moments.
    • If I remember correctly, they were interrupted before Nicole could reveal what the third thing was. I remember feeling like it was an intentional interruption, too. 
    • 1976 Pt 5 Joanne’s hopes are raised when Jack seems to respond to the new woman she’s become. She wore a new dress and had a lovely dinner with wine, and when Jack drank more than he was used to having, he reached for her. Her happiness is dimmed when he calls her Peggy, but she says nothing. The next morning, when Jack can remember nothing, she tells him they made love. When Peggy later tells Joanne she’s going to have to stop helping her make herself over as it’s becoming too painful, Joanne angrily lashes back that Peggy might just as well back off, because Jack made love to her last night. Peggy, angry and hurt, asks Jack if it’s true. Realizing that Joanne told Peggy to hurt her, he tells Peg he’s going to ask Joanne for a divorce now. But Peggy is still guilt-ridden over Joanne and, fearing she can’t handle it yet, tells Jack about Joanne’s suicide attempt. Jack, horrified, goes home to see Joanne, who soon realizes that Peggy must have told him about the pills. She assures Jack that she knows life is too precious to ever do that again. Once Jack is satisfied that she really means it, he returns to us Peggy. But Peggy is close to breaking from the guilt and tension she’s living with, and tells Jack that if he’s ever free, they can decide then. Needing a fresh perspective, Peggy takes Chris up on her offer that Peggy spend the night with her, as Snapper won’t be home.  Chris, meanwhile, has been spending her free time preparing Nancy’s apartment for her homecoming. Expressing appreciation for everything she’s done, Ron has offered to make her a table similar to one he’s made for Nancy. Chris has thanked him and has given him her address so he can deliver it. Stuart, wondering why Ron can’t seem to get another job despite the leads he’s been given, checks him out and learns he was in prison for burglary but there was also’ a rape charge, which was dropped. Chris asks Nancy, who explains that before their marriage Ron picked up a woman in a bar. She took him to her apartment and began to seduce him but then screamed rape. He had taken nothing, Nancy adds, but was told he’d rot in prison if he didn’t plead guilty to burglary. No one  told him that the woman had declined to testify. Nancy was the only one who believed him, and she with him against her family’s wishes. Ron walks in at the end of the conversation and informs Chris that he tried to deliver her table but  finally realized he was looking for the wrong address. When Chris later returns to her apartment, she finds Peggy whimpering on the floor in the dark. Slowly Chris gets the story from Peg: The lights wouldn’t -work when she arrived, and she was grabbed from behind, thrown to the floor, and raped. Chris convinces Peggy that the police must be called and manages to protect Peggy from brutal questioning by insisting upon an officer trained in dealing with rape victims. After Peggy is taken to the hospital, the investigator, Miss Weston, asks Chris who might have  known Peg was there—or might want to rape Chris herself. After thinking this over, Chris tells her about Ron. Jack has been trying to reach Peggy. Lashing out from his own pain, Stuart brutally tells him that she’s been raped and he is partially to blame, as she went to Chris’s to get away from her problem—him. Jack is shattered. Instinctively knowing that Ron is guilty, Chris confronts him. But Ron sticks to his story of looking for a wrong address and, under pressure from Chris, finally offers to be in a lineup. Brock tells his mother that Jill wants to visit Phillip’s grave. Kay replies it will be “a cold day in hell” before. She does. But when Jill asks Kay if she would put some flowers on the grave for her and her baby, Kay, touched, breaks down and asks Jill to go with her. Liz, knowing that Kay spends too much time alone, virtually forces her to accept an invitation for dinner and then invites Ralph Olsen, a plumber who is a widower. Kay is aloof at first -they apparently have nothing in common—but when Ralph turns out to be a former alcoholic, the ice is broken. Ralph offers to help Kay with her drinking problem, and she soon finds she likes him very much. Liz becomes concerned with Kay’s assumption that her friendship with Ralph is heading for much more and tries to warn Kay that. Ralph is not the marrying kind. She tries to head Kay off when she makes plans for a “love nest,” but Kay persists and attempts to seduce Ralph at her pool. He evades her passes and asks her if they can’t just slow things down. But Kay is undaunted, and since he isn’t proposing, she does so herself. Ralph, who has told Bill that Kay’s money stands in‘ their way, gently turns her down, explaining that she would need to change him and they wouldn’t be happy. Humiliated and hurt, Kay starts drinking again.
    • I think it wasn't just some of the poor casting choices that did the show in during its early days, but also the flat writing. Perhaps it was network interference? You'd think the Dobsons would have fought harder for their original vision, but after 6 months they dropped most of it. 
    • Small Bar is a better set than the casino set.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy