Jump to content

Looking back...Primetime Ratings from the 80's


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

1980-1981 season

For the week of January 25, 1981

Dallas featured Lucy and Mitch first wedding. Sue Ellen discovers a cheating JR has returned.

Special Guest Stars are Ted Shakelford and Joan Van Ark

 

 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 996
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Seeing Harper Valley at #28 is a surprise. I was trying to work out where it was airing. I think by Jan 82 it was placed 8.30 Saturday but seems unlikely it would be rating that well there and not sure what the lead in would have been that week. Can any of our sleuths help me out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Correction, the ratings you posted cover January 18-24, 1982. Super Bowl XVI was held January 24, 1982.

The NBC lineup on January 23, 1982 was One of the Boys (series premiere), Harper Valley, Barbara Mandrell, Steve Martin Special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok Thanks. So One of the Boys finished #18. A good start but viewers quickly switched off.  The opposition was Kings Crossing - that was already failing and Walt Disney that may have been a repeat that week, so NBC got a sampling.

In a few weeks ABC debuted TJ Hooker, which took over as timeslot winner. It debuted #11 21.9/39  up against One of the Boys 10.2/18  and first half hour of Chicago Story 9.0/16 while CBS went with Disney 'The Moonspinners' Pt 1 11.9/21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1982/83 Dallas loses #1 to 60 Minutes and the Dallas/Dynasty battle begins as Dynasty scores their first weekly win over Dallas.

That season Dallas had 5 out of 28 episodes finish #1, 20 episodes finish among the Top 5, and 3 episodes finish below the Top 10. 

On a win-loss basis, Dallas record vs. 60 Minutes was 13-15 and vs. Dynasty was 18-3.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The times I have listed are:

Oct 81-Nov 81 Thu 8:00-8:30

Dec 81-Jan 82 Sat 8:00-8:30

Jan 82-Feb 82 Sat 8:30-9:00

Apr 82-Jun 82 Sat 8:00-8:30

Jul 82-Aug 82 Sat 8:30-9:00

The show had initial success for NBC during its first season and came back for its second but as the show dropped the PTA name and changed the focus as the second season went on the show plummeted not long afterward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1983/84 Dallas regains #1 but the battle with Dynasty explodes as Dynasty scores their first weekly #1 finish over Dallas.

That season Dallas had 9 out of 30 episodes finish #1, 19 episodes finish among the Top 5, 1 episode finish among the Top 10, and 1 episode finish below the Top 10. 

On a win-loss basis, Dallas record vs. Dynasty was 21-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What was Riptide about anyways? I vaguely recall a robot being involved in the action but it’s been ages. I always see it doing well 1983-85 but then it appears NBC squandered the whole show it’s final season. At least Joe Penny later had success with Jake and the Fatman. 

All the five primetime soaps had good seasons IMO for 1983-84 season in both writing and in ratings of course. Hotel was better when Anne Baxter was alive although being the soap opera version of the Love Boat didn’t help the show’s cause overall.

Any thoughts as to why Saturday night soaps didn’t work? Dallas had a rather dismal 78-79 season before moving, both Secrets of Midland Heights and King’s Crossing flopped, and Berrenger’s floundered, and Hotel was killed off. I know in the 90’s though Sisters had success though. Just not enough available audience to stay home every Saturday night as opposed to Wed-Fri nights?

Edited by soapfan770
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS aired Any Which Way You Can on January 18, 1985.

Super Bowl week was the turning point of 1984/85.

The season began with all the hype being a Dallas/Dynasty battle for #1, but the momentum shifted after the Super Bowl when new episodes of The Cosby Show began regularly finishing #1.

Dallas had 9 out of 30 episodes finish #1, 16 episodes finish among the Top 5, and 5 episodes finish among the Top 10. Six of the #1 episodes were before Super Bowl week. On a win-loss basis, Dallas record vs. Dynasty was 12-14 and vs. new episodes of The Cosby Show was 14-8. Of the 14 episodes that finished ahead of new episodes of The Cosby Show, 13 of them were before Super Bowl week.

Dynasty had 5 out of 29 episodes finish #1 and the remaining 24 episodes finished among the Top 5. All five of the #1 episodes were before Super Bowl week. On a win-loss basis, Dynasty record vs. new episodes of The Cosby Show was 11-10. All 11 of the episodes that finished ahead of a new episode of The Cosby Show were before Super Bowl week.

The Cosby Show had 9 out of 24 episodes finish #1 in the week of their original broadcast, 6 episodes finish among the Top 5, 8 episodes finish among the Top 10, and 1 episode finish below the Top 10. Eight of the #1 episodes were after Super Bowl week.

The season ended with Dallas losing #1 to Dynasty and finishing 2nd. The Cosby Show finished 3rd.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Too many returns, that's when you know a show has run out of ideas and doesn't care anymore.  Zoe annoyed the sh!t out of me most times, but the Kat/Zoe storyline will always be iconic and close to my heart (that's the era I first started following the show in near real-time), and probably the only storyline in 21st century EastEnders that had long-term value for the characters involved during their initial run together. However, after all this time and the writing choice that Zoe never wants to see Kat again, I think that ship has sailed and I don't know that it makes sense to revisit it at this point. 
    • Former EastEnders star Michelle Ryan is reprising her role as Zoe Slater on the BBC soap following an absence of over 20 years.  It’s been reported that Zoe will return to Albert Square later this year and that she’ll take centre stage in a dramatic new storyline involving her family.  The news comes amidst news of other big returns, which include Max Branning (Jake Wood), Tanya Cross (Jo Joyner), Shirley Carter (Linda Henry) and Ben Mitchell (Max Bowden), who will also be back in Walford later in the year.
    • I actually love the new fashion.
    • Admittedly, I was a latecomer to ATWT (first becoming a regular viewer in 2000). But I really liked KMH's Emily. I thought she was a very specific kind of neurotic professional character, and I loved her prickly relationship with MM's Susan. I will say I don't think the show did her any favors after Hal died, stranding her in storylines with several of the show's dullest characters: nu-Paul, nu-Meg, and nu-Dusty. I actually quite liked one of her last major storylines, when she discovered she had a grown-up biological son with Larry named Hunter. But then Hunter just sort of disappeared, and the story fizzled out, which was pretty typical of the late Goutman years. 
    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy