Jump to content

June 29 - July 3, 2015: GH Continues To Collapse; Hits New Low Again


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

They also had time they could've spared in the actual timespan they used. Instead they spent time on other [!@#$%^&*], or cut pages because Frank the Master Builder (and Editor and Director) needed more of Dud Story X instead of Luke, Laura, Holly, etc.

(And her name's Jennifer.)

I agree about the family, and they may be dealing with Tim and Lena in a way I find meaningful (if cheesy) next week, if the rumors are true. But it would be one of the few parts of the story that work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Of course, you're stanning, but it's your right. However, GH under Ron has NEVER been good. EVER! An eppy or 2 here or there, but nothing really memorable. No stories and all plots. His bag of tricks are the same only he doesn't have enough of the GH cast to hide it now. But I'm not blaming moRon. He can't do what he's not allowed to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH was really good for the Robin's return story, all the Faison aspects were good. Also the vampire story was fun. I liked the Fluke story when Fluke was actually on. For me those were the highlights. The moment RC turned his eye on to Jason and his pals and gals it all went to crap. The audience just left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Robin's story had its moments but the problem with Ron's writing is that he has no payoffs in his stories. Robin returned for nothing….before we knew it she was gone again and left for dumb reasons. Why hasn't she shown up again? Jason is back at GH? Helena is not a threat.

Ron himself said he could only write pregnancy story lines …..he knew the beginning ..middle and ending to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Robin's return was weak. She stood in a lab for 2 eppies after being found by Nik and moRon thru his director and actors under the bus by saying it was written with more urgency. She then hid behind a door for an entire eppy. The ratings were stable, but nothing was happening until Robin was actually revealed. Something actually happened, and that is why viewers tuned in. However, it quickly went south because Dumb and Dumber Ass decided that instead of something meaningful, they'd have this bitch walk out on her family. Knowing Kim was here for a limited time, they didn't have the courage to kill the character or recast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the idea at the time was that he and Marcil and so on were supposed to be better and bring it back.

To me anything past about 1994 is uneven and 97-on are mostly weak with some strong moments here and there. But I wasn't ever a fan of the Spencers. Other than some of his story with Liz I never thought JJ was one of the better parts of the show. I never liked the Lucky/Luke relationship or the way that often translated to it being OK to treat Laura as a drag, a burden, or a target for verbal abuse.

Of course the ratings may go up next week with him back. They can't get much lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That kind of braggadocio is not on the actors, though - that's on the press and the PR departments.

And aside for some rough times in the rape revisit story (which was intentionally rough) I didn't see Lucky ever doing that to Laura, but YMMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem with Robin's return - which still made most of today's show look like Shakespeare, IMO - was that they had Kim contracted for, what, three or four months straight? And they spent the bulk of that airtime on her skulking around in disguise. This was, allegedly, a direct homage to Laura's return in '83 which had a similar development, but they knew they had a limited amount of time to work Kim and pay it off right. Instead, they faffed about for months, milked it to death and then threw together a bullshit exit and subsequent developments.

That is a fundamental problem they've had for years, and not just on GH. Milk something to death before the payoff, gamble that they can pull it out in the crunch, deliver a payoff, and then !@#$%^&*] up and fumble the ball, and blame everyone else. And it's happened over and over and over. If it's not Kimberly McCullough, it's Steve Burton (who they shouldn't have waited on to begin with - they were right to let him bounce, but then they gambled that he'd come back) or Trevor St. John, or others.

Or Prospect Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy