Members allmc2008 Posted June 13, 2014 Members Share Posted June 13, 2014 Was there truly a purpose to show the trials on a daily basis? Could have they just had an occasional news break during commercial to keep us informed? They could have kept it on CNN considering that is why CNN was created. I am not talking about this in regards to the effect it had on daytime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted June 13, 2014 Members Share Posted June 13, 2014 No. It wasn't like Watergate or the Iran-Contra affair. Whether or not an ex-NFL star had murdered his ex-wife and her acquaintance had no impact whatsoever on national security or our systems of government. On the other hand, after the media circus which had surrounded Rodney King, the LAPD and the subsequent L.A. riots only three years earlier, I guess something was bound to come along and top it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Eric83 Posted June 13, 2014 Members Share Posted June 13, 2014 Well there was a demand for it. I forgot how huge this trial was. It was like the George Zimmerman trial times 1 million. I read last night the OJ trial generated over $1 billion in merchandise sales and ad revenue. People wanted to watch it so networks showed it for ratings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members quartermainefan Posted June 13, 2014 Members Share Posted June 13, 2014 There was a purpose because there was a demand. People watched. Before OJ there was the Menendez trial and and people were glued to that too (but that was limited to cable). Televised trials were something new then and OJ was a celebrity, of course people would watch--OJ Simpson was on trial for murder. OJ had a high level of fame being first a sports star and then switched over to being a working actor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Nate4 Posted June 13, 2014 Members Share Posted June 13, 2014 Ugh who cares anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members katie_9918 Posted June 17, 2014 Members Share Posted June 17, 2014 Seconded. The guy murdered two people and got away with it. When compared to that, who cares what happened to soaps because of that circus of a trial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members allmc2008 Posted June 17, 2014 Author Members Share Posted June 17, 2014 I am not asking this in relation to the soaps in any way. I am simply asking if it was needed to be broadcasted daily on network television considering cable networks like CNN were created for this kind of thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members VirginiaHamilton Posted August 6, 2014 Members Share Posted August 6, 2014 I'm sorry, but I've never bought into the notion that the OJ trial was this mean old soap-killer. (If anything, that was a scapegoat for the real issue of shitty writing sinking once-great shows, but TIIC and their ass-kissing shills will never cop to that.) Having eaten both up with a spoon back in the day, I never once felt the need to sacrifice one over the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.fbb6aa067610794e36433d57928a2f42.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.