Jump to content

Ratings from the 80's


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

@JAS0N47  So Betsy & Steve wed on May 30, 1984 and ATWT had a rating of 7.8 so at this time how many people was that? I have no sense at this point what a rating point equaled. Thanks!

So two people on UglyX found this for me. And, with it a resource that is new to me, anyway. Don't know if you know it already. 

https://www.ratingsryan.com/2021/03/weekly-nielsen-ratings-1984-85-tv-season.html

So, at this point a ratings point represents 849,000 which means Steve & Betsy's wedding had 6,622,200 which is a far shot below the 20 million claimed & also significantly below the 16 million Doug & Julie claim. It also debunks that they are the second highest watched daytime wedding. 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
more info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Since Donna was asking, I tracked down the page in the books that has the info, so for those interested:

TV Households per season (equals 1 ratings point):

Sep. 1980: 799,000 (revised from 778,000 based on census in Jan. 1981)
Sep. 1981: 815,000
Sep. 1982: 833,000
Sep. 1983: 838,000
Sep. 1984: 849,000 
Sep. 1985: 859,000
Sep. 1986: 874,000
Sep. 1987: 886,000
Sep. 1988: 904,000
Sep. 1989: 921,000

Rest of years (1989-2021) on my website at bottom of this page: http://www.jason47.com/days/weeklynielsens.html

As to your post above, yes, RatingsRyan is the lead on the Nielsen project, so that's where the full books will eventually be posted once they are scanned.

Edited by JAS0N47
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
 
I think the Nielsen ratings for those two weddings are reported as correct. You just made me do math, which is my least favorite subject, but I think I did it correctly below! I looked at the weekly charts for these two weddings, and if you use the Total Audience number, that gets them a little higher. (Again, these are the averages for the 5-episode week, so it's possible that the wedding episode got a really high number, and the remainder of the week got much more normal numbers, which would bring down the overall weekly average):
 
GH-Luke/Laura 1981 (said to be 30 million viewers):
Avg. Audience: 13.8   
Total Audience: 17.1 (13,936,00 viewers)
Their season average at the time was 10,840,000. So if you assign that average to the other 4 episodes (10,840,000 x 4) that gets you to 43,360,000 (4 episodes) plus 1 episode of 30,000,000 = 73,360,000 divided by 5 = average for the 5-episode week of 14,672,000 (pretty close to the 13,936,500 that the Nielsen book has for Total Audience; so it means the other episodes that week had higher-than-usual daily averages as well)
 
ATWT-Steve/Betsy 1984 (said to be 20 million viewers):
Average Audience: 7.8
Total Audience: 9.9 (8,296,200 viewers)
Their season average at the time was 6,540,000. So if you assign that average to the other 3 episodes that week (6,540,000 x 3) that gets you to 19,620,000 (3 episodes) plus 1 episode of 20,000,000 = 39,620,000 divided by 4 = average for the 4-episode week of 9,905,000 which equals a little higher than the 8,296,200 total audience number reported; again like GH meaning that the week had higher-than-usual daily averages as well).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. I don't fully understand either. But along with the Average Audience (the number we are used to using), in the 1980's at least there was also a Total Audience number reported, which was much higher than the average audience. Plus, the numbers you were using to say the ATWT wedding was way lower than 20 million was the 4-episode weekly average (they were preempted once that week, so there was only 4 episodes, not 5). You didn't take into account that the first 3 episodes of that week would have much lower ratings (more normal ratings; or a little higher than normal ratings) and the wedding episode itself would be the 20 million episode. Based on that math I did above, it seems certainly possible that the 5/30/84 episode had either an Average or Total Audience of 20 million. And the same goes for that 30 million number for the GH wedding in 1981.
 

So my best guess is that they may be reporting the TOTAL AUDIENCE number for the wedding episodes (not the usual AVERAGE AUDIENCE number that we use for the ratings data each week in the charts).

Edited by JAS0N47
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What is fascinating is that the common belief when a show drops so badly is that it is not being carried well (like Dark Shadows in the fall of 1970).  But according to this, Another World has 99% coverage, SFT 93%, and Texas 91%.  Those are healthy numbers.  The Doctors only has 71%, but Edge of Night with 80% has double it's audience. So, the bottom line is that Search was pretty reachable by the CBS audience, but they simply choose not to come over, because they had become involved in Y&R (unless some key markets were missing in that 93%).  Same with Texas.  Unless key markets (any of the top 33 markets) had pre-empted it, it should have performed much better.  Does anyone know of the 33 largest markets (which is what Nielsen uses), which may have had pre-empted Texas, SFT, or TD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Members

I recently posted these for 1976-1979 and 1990-1995, so going to start posting 1980-1989. A 4-week-a-year look at the non-soap daytime ratings!

FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1980 & MAY 1980:

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unless I'm not searching properly in the 1970s ratings thread, the latest I found is May 1978.

April 23, 1979 CBS moved The Price is Right to it's current time slot 11 am ET. 

Sometime between May 1978 and February 1980, The Price is Right became the #1 non-soap daytime program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that was due to four things: 1) Bob Barker, who was an affable host, if not entirely down-to-earth; 2) "Barker's Beauties," who always projected images of being like the girls next door; 3) the fact that the studio audience was always on screen, and that the contestants were picked from that audience and didn't just appear like magic on stage the way they did on most other game shows; and 4) the variety and unpredictability of the pricing games.

You knew there'd be an "Item Up for Bid" and two Showcase Showdowns - one halfway through the show, at the wheel; and the other, toward the end.  But you didn't know which pricing games would be played on which show, or how those games would turn out for the contestants.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't posted them all yet, I was just saying it generally. I'll be finishing up the 1970's and 1990's in the next few days.

February 1980 is the first chart that happens. Now you have me interested in checking the exact week, so I'll check the 11/79-1/80 weeks as well and see when that happens!

UPDATE: 

Price Is Right 2 took over the # 1 spot the week of 2/4/80-2/8/80, which is when GL moved to 3-4PM, pushing One Day at a Time from 330-4PM to 4-430PM.
 
The last week One Day at a Time aired at 330PM, 1/28/80-2/1/80, it got a 8.9/26 (98 percent clearance, 190 affiliates). The next week at 4PM, it got a 3.8/11 (62 percent clearance, 122 affiliates). So the cutting of One Day a Time affiliates from 190 to 122 is what finally got Price Is Right 2 into the # 1 spot.
 
UPDATE # 2: It is only briefly though, since I just started typing up the August 1980 chart, and ABC put Love Boat up against Price Is Right hour, and Love Boat is now # 1.
Edited by JAS0N47
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@JAS0N47 Thank you for the additional info 

Please register in order to view this content

I'm interested too. The Price is Right was the first daytime show I became a fan of, and that lead me to the rest of the CBS game show block and then to the CBS soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I look forward to comparing The Price Is Right vs. Wheel of Fortune and Scrabble/Win, Lose or Draw. I'm curious to see if there was a rising tide effect for the network version of WOF when the syndicated version went through the roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Mary Carney was the best of the Mary recasts. I think everyone I've seen talk about the show has said this, or almost everyone. The show just gave up too quickly. I agree the story was over. I don't think the show ever developed Mary's career enough to make viewers care about that aspect. I remember reading an interview with Ilene Kristen where she talked about how much support she got from viewers with Jill and Frank (I think it was from around then). I don't know if Roger/Delia was always the plan (wasn't he interested in Mary early on?) but I sometimes think they threw that together to try to make viewers feel Delia had no moral high ground. Frank was an interesting construct as a man who looked like the ideal politician yet behaved...like a typical politician. I think that's why he mostly took off once they cast Daniel Hugh Kelly, who fit the duality. 
    • Yes and no. If they had wanted to recast Phillip, then no, he didn't need to return. There were already too many recast Spauldings at this point. Regardless of how you feel about Dusay, Raines or Poser, I think the viewers had trouble connecting to them. I think the viewers loved Rick Hearst, and yes, if he had stayed, then you could've built around him. But with a lackluster Michael Dietz soon to appear, Grant Aleksander anchored the family. Reva--pfft. Yes, she could've stayed gone. I'm unsure what the early reception to Josh/Annie was, but I thought RN and CW had good chemistry. Reva had been gone a while at this point, the audience would've accepted anyone who was good to Josh's children. 
    • Phillip and Rick became BEST friends when they first SORASed the characters.  They had been at the same boarding school and came back together to finish high school. That's when they met Mindy and Beth. The four of them were together a lot and called themselved The Four Musketeers. Initially, Phillip/Mindy and Rick/Beth were paired up until Phillip fell in love with Beth. 
    • LaGuardia, R. (1974b). The wonderful world of TV soap operas. ISBN-13 ISBN-13 978-0345272836 It took Harding “Pete” Lemay, however, a skilled playwright who thoroughly believed in the heretofore unexplained psychological potential of the daytime serial, to transform Mrs. Nixon’s love-triangle subplot into a balanced story contrasting realistic human behavior and that “other world of fantasy and striving. He found story devices no longer necessary.” For example, Lemay said, “I didn’t feel it was necessary to keep Rachel a black-and-white character. I didn’t see her as a villainess… I saw her instead as a human being who had always had bad breaks and who defeats herself because she is so used to failure. When she lost Steve this last time, I wanted the audience to feel her pain as I felt it. I wanted them to feel her tears. Mr. Lemay, along with his producer, Paul Rauch, should be given an Award for the Greatest Contribution to Daytime Serials, for completely eliminating melodramatic cliche’s in a daytime drama, and for their invaluable demonstration that, what viewers really want is drama based on psychology rather than on escapist melodrama. Under Lemay and Rauch “Another World”, which had previously used many tried-and-true soap opera devices (although fewer than most other shows), got rid of them, employed inward writing, and became one of the top two or three daytime television shows. About the only happy event in “Another World” was the birth of Ada’s daughter, Nancy, named after Ada’s dear friend on her deathbed Nancy Wickwire.   Edit to add: Emphasis on "dear friend". Should be changed to "special friend".  
    • ITA. While I'm all for vets being featured, the show has boxed itself in by not adequately developing a younger set. It's like Kyle's realistic options are Claire and Audra with Summer gone. Chance is barely used. Noah and Faith are off-canvas now.  Abby's story has been run to the ground in all the wrong ways. There's a Newman/Abbott war going on and Abby is on the sidelines? Give me a break. Abby shouldn't be a hostess, but at either Jabot or NE and right in the middle of all this stuff. Abby and Adam should've formed an alliance as the not Nick/Victoria kids.
    • Absolutely. On any other show, Frank Ryan would have been a shining romantic hero. I think they made Delia so impossible so you would feel as though he had a right to cheat on her. But he was a deadbeat dad, neglectful of the women in his life, even neglectful of his family, ridiculously ambitious. Once in a while he'd show some integrity, and then he'd go back to being a self-centered jerk. But he was definitely an interesting character.  When Pat was married to Delia, it was two incredibly neurotic people caught together in a very toxic relationship. Again, fascinating to watch. Yeah, when those first contracts ran out, the people leaving caused a big issue. Almost like they did too good a job with the initial casting.  I actually liked the first recast for Mary. (I think her name was Mary Carney?) Part of the problem was after being so front-burner for 3 years, Mary and Jack's story was basically resolved and they had to fall back on the tired "marriage vs career" trope. Then they brought in the second and third recasts that were total misses. Plus, they were ramping up Siobhan's character. It seemed they were more interested in focusing on her once Mulgrew left. 
    • Thank you, all - so helpful! I didn’t realize Ross was Phillip’s bio uncle - how cool!  What happened to his real parents, and I’m assuming Ross didn’t like Alan for swapping the babies? It does sound like the writers might be making some things up then with A-M and Phillip feuding, but we’ll see how it plays out. Phillip currently is in a home with a woman’s voice in the distance (not sure who this is yet), and he keeps looking at a newspaper with the Spaulding family picture. They finally revealed his face in a Friday cliffhanger, but it was so obvious his voice was Grant A’s haha. He has such a distinct voice to me. Very interesting, so are Fletcher and Rick at odds then since he was the brother? Honestly in the year since Rick has been back in SF, they’ve rarely, if ever, been in a scene together that I recall. The storyline with Blake right now getting pregnant off a one-night stand with Rick from a bar night after Blake was upset with Ross, and not knowing who the father is…. sounds similar to that Meredith storyline in a way haha.  I remember someone posted an episode from the 80s of Rick smelling this scarf and Phillip lifting weights (so funny/strange), which made me think they were close friends in the beginning.  I’m guessing this storyline put them at odds - did they ever recover before they both left SF or will this be a fractured friendship when Phillip returns? Sounds like I need to know more about this Beth character, as she’s pretty important to Phillip’s backstory. So I wonder if the lady he’s talking to in these current scenes is Beth, if they’re still together?   That must be when Rick went to Chicago then and met Annie during the years he left SF. Thanks, again - this was all helpful background/context as I get to meet Phillip for the first time. I just have to get it out of my head he isn’t the bad Alec McIntyre (AMC) haha.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Hmmm... I don't know if I agree the show has been doing this with Sonny since the mid-90's.  He was more anti-hero than hero back then and had a whole lot of baggage.  He also had some very decent qualities. This was long before his bipolar diagnosis.   I have said this so many times on this board, but the true ending for the Sonny character was leaving Brenda at the altar.  Not because I wanted that or anything.  I was upset for days and might still be 25 years later.  It was just Sonny finally doing something very unselfish and leaving Brenda for her own good and well-being.  The family and life he craved he realized he couldn't achieve because of the business.  That to me was the end of Sonny's arc. It's unfortunate MB didn't make it primetime and came back a year later lol.
    • I shouldn't write like an authority, which I do too often. It's how I feel but I respect that others did appreciate the writing last year with Sonny.
    • What are the additional surprises that Leslie has up her sleeve?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy