Jump to content

BRAVO: Vanderpump Rules


rlj

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 575
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

A great season premiere.

Kristen is nuts, likely some sort of personality disorder, but she's done well to find someone equally loathsome in James...he shouldn't keep banging on about how he's 22 when Tom Sandoval looks younger than him. And I'd be willing to bet that BMW is leased. Kristen is obsessive and obsessive people are dangerous.

Of the SUR staff, aside from Peter the manager, Tom Schwartz seems to be the most decent person on the show, but judging from the previews...this could change.

Jax is a laughing stock. He's how old and is a bartender getting a nose job while dating two women. The whole thing wreaks.

Lisa and Robert Earl, another member of the British contingent in Hollywood, have been friends for many, years and, surprise, surprise, his bar Mixology hosted Sheana's birthday party/disaster. Lisa is looking gorgeous as ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, DF. I thought it was a great premiere. If anything I am worried that Kristen is usurping Stassi's spot of pot-stirrer last season. But time will tell. Stassi as pot-stirrer = more fun for me versus Kristen who I don't like. And yes, she is clearly a little nutso.

Hmmm...Peter.

Like I checked, Jax was 35 so maybe 36 now. So I agree. But you know how we guys can be sometimes...ph34r.png

Oooooo...nice info. I agree. Lisa in that black dress. I was just blown away by it watching it earlier as it repeated and stopped everything to just watch her move. Just such charisma there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A very good second episode - fast paced and a firing and Jax got his sorry ass read, it usually doesn't get this good until late in the season!

It was so satisfying to see Lisa fire James, what an insipid little worm. Peter is clearly one of Lisa's most trusted employees, displaying consistent loyalty at all times, while hating all the same people the audience hates. Peter for the win.

Glad Lisa didn't fire Tom Schwartz before he even got started.

Tom Sandoval really needs to clean his apartment. What a dump!

Jax is a loser and life is going to be seriously crappy for him in a couple of years when his looks totally go and he has no education, no career and no viable prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He's a snitch tho and I can't stand snitches. And he's got nothing on Sandoval. Lisa better stop playing cuz he's one of the few nice charming ones to root for.

And I forget if I hated Tom when he was coocoo Kristen but he's looking and sounding so much more normal these days. I like him with the blond girl.

Jax just looked so pathetic in this latest episode. I'm glad the girl made it clear she didn't want to ever see him again. I didn't realize he's now 35 and has no other job or prospects besides this show. What a damn shame. He's one of those life long bachelors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A snitch? You cannot be serious. He's the manager of the restaurant. He's management. He's above the staff. He owes Lisa undivided loyalty. That's not being a snitch, that's be a professional and doing your job.

And Jax is not a lifelong bachelor. That's an insult to bachelors. He's a lifelong loser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just caught up. Jax is almost 40 and is still a waiter. I have no idea why any woman would want a serious relationship with him. And judging by the tragic penis print in the photo below he doesn't even have THAT going for him. :mellow:

ec30713205de7861a662044be6f160ac.jpg

Edited by Eric83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy