Jump to content

Andrew Breitbard Is Dead


VirginiaHamilton

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Good riddance to bad rubbish:

original.png

Andrew Breitbart Is Dead (UPDATE)

Right wing web provacateur Andrew Breitbart is dead. His own sites, Big Journalism and Big Government and Big Hollywood, are all carrying a statement from Breitbart.com president Larry Solov saying that "Andrew passed away unexpectedly from natural causes shortly after midnight this morning in Los Angeles."

Breitbart was 43 years old. His last tweet came just seven hours ago.

Joel Pollak, Editor in Chief and in-house counsel at Breitbart.com, tells us, "It's real, nothing further at this time."

Update: ABC producer Katie Bosland says on Twitter: "LA Coroner's Office has confirmed to @ABC that Andrew Breitbart passed away last night at UCLA Medical Center." The New York Times has also confirmed his death.

Michelle Malkin on his death:

I saw Andrew a few weeks ago in Michigan at an Americans for Prosperity event and spent time catching up with him on a plane ride back West. We talked about the renewed vigor with which the conservative movement was fighting back against Alinskyite tactics - especially the race card.

Update: According to Fox News while walking around Midnight last night. He had longstanding heart problems.

Santorum on Breitbart: "What a huge loss...might be for our country and certainly for the conservative movement.

http://gawker.com/58...-breitbart-dead

ETA: Just realized that I made a typo in the title. Should a mod pass by this thread, would you mind correcting it for me? Thank you very much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Breitbard was a piece of s#it, but to celebrate his untimely death at this early stage is really sick. What Edward Kennedy did was far worse than Brietbard's actions, but I can only imagine how you would have felt if somebody on the right-wing fringe was jumping for joy the day he died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We don't know how VirginiaHamilton would react to a comment about Ted Kennedy. Many people did not give a hoot about the man.

As for Breitbart, the Shirley Sherrod stuff was really offensive. I think that would sink many careers. That he is being lauded instead is indicitave of our culture today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not as offensive as leaving somebody to drown in a car and waiting until the next morning to report the accident. And Kennedy is a hero to a lot more liberals than Brietbard is to conservatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I would like to be as classy as Media Matters has been on this, stating only that their thoughts and prayers are with Breitbart's family (would we get a similar reaction from the big conservative blogs if Keith Olbermann or Bill Maher or Michael Moore -- although IMO all three are false equivalencies to Breibart -- died?), I have to be honest and say I'm in the "good riddance" place too.

Seeing CNN today describe him as a "Rebel with a Cause"...what!? And then they showed him "standing up to" Occupy protesters, cutting away (of course!) just before he started screaming like a lunatic about rape. And how the heck did Breitbart even get a job on CNN as a commentator after the whole Shirley Sherrod episode!? I'm going to vomit if Piers Morgan devotes his entire show to that vile scumbag tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kennedy has nothing to do with it, Breitbart was just a very angry, ugly person who took politics too seriously and was bent on destroying those who voiced unfavorable opinions, very knowingly and without reservation. Ted Kennedy did the wrong thing after, but he didn't set out to deliberately drive the car off the bridge. I think Kennedy was more attacked for that over partisan reasons than any actual sense of right or wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whenever he appeared on TV, I always cringed not only because of his vile politics and his rather ludicrous way of attacking everything that he considered liberal, elitist, etc, but also because he so obviously was dealing with some kind of substance abuse problem. Quite often he looked homeless with the stubble, the wrinkled shirts and his unkempt hair, but he also slurred his words a lot, seemed unfocused and disoriented frequently. Anyways no one should have to die so young.

Also, Alley Mills (Pam B&B is his stepmother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy