Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted

I have to admit I didn't pay much attention to the Constantine storyline. It felt like added filler to the show which at that time was all about the Shane McGrath shooting and Stephanie's crusade to get Brooke's kids taken off her.

Thank you

Please register in order to view this content

Yes it looks like they've got 2002 sorted. Fingers crossed.

  • Members
Posted

Heads up guys, on youtube there will be premiering an iconic episode soon - Brooke returning to Forrester in time to stop the invasion. And the iconic scene where she fires Ridge as CEO.

  • Members
Posted

Once Sarah Buxton was gone, the show really lost its fun vibe. I was super excited for 2001, but it ended up being kind of a letdown.

By January 2002, things are really heating up again. The show is totally hitting its stride. Ronn Moss absolutely crushed it in the boardroom scene. Usually, his serious face doesn’t do much for the show, but when it comes to a business storyline, he really nails it.

It's funny how hardly anyone brings up 2004. It feels like that year is totally overlooked when people discuss B&B. I don't think the show has even posted any episodes from that year. I only started watching the show regularly from 2005 onwards, so anything before that seems like a blur.

  • Members
Posted

I kinda liked 2001... and loved 2002. And overall 1999-2003 is LIGHT years more strong period than 1994-1998. 2004 and 2005 are not bad at all! AT ALL. And 2005 has one of my most favorite camp storylines - Stephanie's heart attack that gave us that iconic showdown between Brooke and Stephanie... in the presence of Jackie. It was sooo great.  2003-2007 is very Nick oriented... and it started GOOD and ended up badly. He would change women and they would change him every couple of months. And I hated the Nick/Brooke/Bridget triangle. It was disgusting and went for waaay too long. 

  • Members
Posted

Guys if you could pick... which 3 seasons of the show are the ultimate worst... LIKE absolute worst.

I have my picks.

1. 2024 - uninspired drivel, parody of the former show. Mints, toes and staplers... And a backpack.

2. 2022 - incredibly boring, skippable year. It had 4 months of Brooke crying because she kissed Santa. Yawn.  

3.1994 - a huge flop compared to the years before it. It's like.. the show's first car crash where nothing was the same afterwards.  

 

  • Members
Posted

Well it was Bradley's first full year.

Also it was the year B&B's time slot rival Reilly Days took off. Not to mention the year of OJ.

  • Members
Posted

Yes, it's Bradley's fist and unsuccessful attempt at re-vamping the show, making it more hip and modern. The new faces didn't help - all of them flopped in time. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy