Jump to content

B&B: Old/Classic Discussion & Articles


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Jack and Stephanie skinny dipped. They saw each other's bits and bobs. It was pretty much implied they were intimate IMO. You don't need a sex scene (especially with the older cast) to prove intimacy.

That she must have slept with Massimo and Eric within days of each other back in the day should have been enough ammunition for Brooke to have been able to sling "S* from Chicago" at her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing that always irked me about Stephanie was her constant resorting to physical violence (slapping is a form of assault). She punched down on Brooke because Brooke never faught back. Yet when Sheila did it, it was "abnormal behaviour, pathological". REALLY?!

No, that was you getting your ass handed to you from someone who wasn't afraid to fight you back you old windbag.

Don't get me wrong, I loved when Stephanie would stand up for the underdog. But too many times she also used excessive force on people physically weaker than her (women especially) and that wasn't fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand you guys, but Brooke calling Stephanie a slut would have been cringe. Really cringe. For me. I mean... compared to Brooke, Stephanie is Mary of Nazareth. Brooke earned that title - it belongs to her and nobody else. LOL. And let's not forget that what happened with Massimo and Stephanie was a stupid rewrite done in 2002 after 15 years of story - the basis of which Stephanie was calling Brooke a whore, a bitch in heat, a slut, a tramp, a prostitute and etc. We can have another re-write in 2 years revealing that Stephanie was a hooker for a year, but that won't change the fact that the characters were meant to be opposites and on the different ends of the spectrum.  

And that storyline was completely in contrary to couple of DNA tests done in the 90s, especially the one where Brooke was testing if Ridge or Eric was the father of her baby. It would be quite hard to conceal that these two men are not related at all. AT ALL. That they don't have any DNA likeness. 

2002's reveal was one of Bradley cheap tricks to scandalize and turn the tables. Some people loved it, I myself have a mixed opinion about it. 

 

Yes, Stephanie was a bully and she resulted to violence. I kind of liked that they explored that aspect when it was revealed she was actually a child victim of abuse at the hands of her father. It closed up the cycle of abuser-abused-abuser. And proved the point that abuse ignites abuse. 

I also have mixed opinions about this, I get that it's disturbing to some people, especially in 2024, and it should be. Violence is never the path. But it did provide us some great, great campy classic moments. The slaps I mean. I liked when Brooke returned the slap! Or even initiate it.

I think the moments where Stephanie went too far were in 1999 when she beat Brooke like a dog - this was really too much and that scene looks disturbing to me. The other slaps don't have nothing on it. It was too much. And in 2007 when Stephanie pretty much planned someone to abuse Brooke - again, crossed a line. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember the storyline. It was nice to see a softer, more vulnerable side to Stephanie. But as soon as therapy was over, she was back to her old ways, if not meaner and nastier than before. She didn't learn anything. She just made excuses for her abusive behaviour and carried on being abusive towards others.

I agree the first time Brooke slapped her was the best one. It came out of nowhere and it rattled Stephanie. The next two slaps didn't have the same effect. In fact Stephanie came back swinging and nearly snapped her neck in half! Poor KKL lol

The campy moments of B&B are fun, but they haven't aged all that well IMO. Calling Brooke derogatory names and sl*t shaming? It starts to sound like a broken record. Yes we know what Brooke is. Tell us something we don't know?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate it so much

Please register in order to view this content

I mean despite Brookes actions in the past, I feel Hope has always been unfairly attacked just because she’s Brooke’s daughter! I couldn’t believe Taylor’s gull to tell Hope to her face today that “you were the only Logan that had any dignity left” when all the did back then when Steffy and Hope were fighting over Liam, was compare Hope to Brooke and saw no problem with Steffy using Brooke like tactics to get him….it makes me sick and I just wish for once, it would all get thrown back in their faces.! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Taylor, slept her way through two families!! TWO!! Including Rick! One could argue Brooke slept with both Forrester and Marone men, but Brooke’s never crossed any line with the younger men….Taylor would be more willing to sleep with both Liam and Finn, if Thudley would own up that she’s just as much of a pathetic s*ut as she always accused Brooke of being…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I recently watched this paternity test sequence after some 30 years, knowing Massimo was later retconned as Ridge's father, the Tracy Peters explanation as to how Eric could not be the father of Bridget had so many holes in it. I mean we didn't know that at the time, but still, for people like me who likes to have storyline consistency, and followthrough, it just doesn't work with hindsight in mind. It would have been even more jaw-dropping at the time had that DNA test revealed that Ridge and Eric could not possibly be related. Can you imagine? The could have beens!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
    • Josh continues to try and milk Abbott/Newman rivalry. First it was Billy/Victoria, then Kyle/Summer, then Noah/Allie (that worked out well) and now Kyle/Claire. Do we have any inkling when Billy Flynn will arrive and who he will play? I'm sure Cole's illness will mostly play offscreen. What's in store for Nick and Sharon? Is it time to put them back together? I can't see any other romantic options. Nick has no children on the canvas to play off, as Christian is never seen. Sharon has only Mariah onscreen.
    • I would appreciate (if they're not coming), for future scripts to refer to them by their iconic hairdos.  For example, if Hope needs to call Chelsea because Bo has Sepsis, I'd like Shawn-D to say, "My Mom called Chelsea (the one with the sassy short black hair) for an update." Also, new rule, if Melanie does return, she needs to dye her hair back to red.  I googled who she was five times during Victor's funeral.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Broderick, thank you for all of the info [I edited for space]. I am so grateful for everyone filling in the blanks for me. I suspected the Nora/Eliot scene was very important and it was setting something up but I didn't know what. Can't wait to see it play out. The two actors had such a great back and forth. I should have made the Paige/Patty Hearst connection. I thought Paige was in love with Brian from the first episode I watched but it seemed as if they were brother and sister. Steve kept being affectionate with her so I assumed he was the love interest. Then she was affectionate with someone else and well..she's a very busy woman. I can't wait to see Frances Fisher show up. (I'm trying to be vague because I don't know what would be a spoiler in this storyline) Now it makes sense why Draper would be upset. I didn't get the whole background of why he didn't go to NY. I'm a sucker for good acting, so I might still side with April and Margo, if the writers don't give Draper more to do besides yelling.  He had more chemistry with Logan, but I know that's not happening.  Something else I noticed: the show really takes care with even the smallest parts. The acting is superb. Too often, I noticed on older soaps they don't take care with the recurring or day players (Ryan's Hope was so bad with this that I couldn't make it through some episodes). It's only been six episodes, but so far, the casting department was spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy