Jump to content

May 30 - June 3, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

According to the numbers that Toups posted, since September 20, 2010 through June 5, 2011, OLTL's household rating is 1.9, GH's is 2.1. During the same time period, OLTL women 18-49 rating is 1.1, GH's is 1.4. I'm not one to make too much out of GH's small lead in these two categories, but it makes more sense to look at what the two shows have done over a longer period of time than just a few weeks, especially when you want to gloat. ABC canceled the right soaps, and GH will be right behind them in a few months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I keep seeing you argue this point, and yet....it's not the way networks usually do business. It's always, "What have you done for me lately?" when it comes to canceling shows. If a primetime show is doing very well in the fall, and tanks in the spring, it gets canceled over a show that tanked in the fall, but has been beating the other show pretty regularly in the spring. They NEVER cancel shows based on a year-long ratings sample. It just doesn't work that way. OLTL was canceled just because it had always been picked to be the first to go from the time AMC was moved to L.A. It's sudden ratings upsurge wasn't going to change that, unless ABC had an intention of staying in the soap business. And they don't. GH is gone next year, as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC canceled all three soaps. This business that OLTL should somehow have been spared is just the latest manifestation of the tiresome "red-headed stepchild" persecution complex and just like I predicted the hatefest has moved from AMC to GH. When people look back on the death of the genre, OLTL will be the only show that gets noted for the fact that it's fans, supporters and its own actors, spent the waning days attacking other soaps, unrelated shows (Oprah) and even the show's creator instead of celebrating it and saying a fitting goodbye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sure they will. Of course not many people are going to care about the death of the genre but the ten or fifteen who do will definitely note the "Lord of the Flies" vibe where the OLTLers acted like Jack. Of course most will just keep blaming women in the workplace and OJ so the people who did this will get a big cosmic pass. It's just a shame that the Convergence Culture Consortium stopped covering soaps. They actually kept it all in perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let's face it, marceline, those "ten or fifteen" people you think will "note the....vibe" are pretty much going to do so in their own echo chamber. The rest of the world couldn't give two $hits.

And I know you disagree, but I think OLTL's crushing of AMC in the key demo is what killed ABC daytime more quickly than it would have gone otherwise. If everything had gone according to plan, AMC would've thrived in L.A. (garnering recent OLTL-like ratings in the key demo), and OLTL would've been the lone cancellation. AMC and GH would've then lived another few years, at least. But things didn't go according to plan. OLTL bested AMC, forcing ABC to cancel both...and now GH won't last beyond next year, either, because it's barely out-rating the canceled OLTL. Heck, Frons is even acknowledging as much by moving OLTL's headwriter (and probably EP) to GH in a last-ditch effort to keep the show going....but it won't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Lately" doesn't mean a week or two. Networks aren't going to make a decision because a show has a good four weeks. But, even in the comparison that you are using, what OLTL is doing in comparison to GH during the last month or so, the fact still remains that there hasn't been this wide gap, and there really hasn't been one as big as the lead that GH has on OLTL during the past nine months. For goodness sake, here are the key demo numbers for this week: GH 1.0/6 (same/-.2) <---- ties low (2nd straight week),OLTL 0.9/6 (-.1/-.2). And it's pretty much like that every week, one of the other of them will have a 1.1 or 1.0 and the other will be .9, so please tell me what's there to brag about? What's the difference between a 1.1 and a .9? They are statistically the same, so if a show that's getting a 1.1 is in trouble, then so is the one that's getting a .9. For goodness sake, since GH did better in the demo this week than OLTL did, the bragging doesn't even make any sense.

ABC made the decision to cancel OLTL last year, that's obvious. It's also obvious that sometime this year the network also decided to find a possible replacement for GH. Neither shows ratings are enough to lure in big advertisers.

OLTL hasn't had a ratings upsurge, over the course of the year it's up a tenth of a point, and while that might sound nice, it's still incredibly low. OLTL was slated to be canceled for that reason, it's ratings are too low, so advertisers are not going to pay to have their ads run during the time that it is on.

AMC is getting OLTL type numbers in the key demo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No what I think is that they all would've gotten canceled because ABC WANTS OUT OF THE SOAP BUSINESS. The order might've changed but the end result would've been the same. ABC doesn't want to make this product any more. And to watch people keep trying to make this about this one lone show being too good, too plucky, too brazen, too victimized, etc... has become surreal. Talk about a [!@#$%^&*] echo chamber. This has turned into CSI:OLTL with people looking for that special bit of DNA to prove this show was murdered because it was just that good.

OLTL wasn't going to get saved and it didn't get canceled because its the poor wittle red-headed stepchild. It got canceled because ABC WANTS OUT OF THE SOAP BUSINESS. That's not as much fun as the conspiracy theories but really when you hear hoofbeats think horses not unicorns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marceline, you are one of my favorite posters, but I really cannot believe that you feel this way. Your comments don't exactly help stop us vicious and bitter OLTL fans, if anything it instigates matters. Frankly I am glad that AMC has stabilized its ratings and hope the fans have an amazing ending to their show. I blame AMC for NOTHING. Everybody was a sitting duck here- everyone. OLTL was always the first to go- and I said this here EVERYDAY. (Granted I was wrong that AMC would outlive OLTL, but that WAS the plan.) And I don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WHO THE HECK IS BRAGGING? You anti OLTL'ers (I don't know what to call you) keep this bull-hit going and accuse US of this idiotic war. Let's just face it. Every post here is agenda driven. Will this ever end? I think this will still be going in February 2012! After both shows are dead. The ratings suck all across the board. Who can brag about shows that are cancelled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry but what I've seen is a bunch of people who went from blaming AMC for OLTL being canceled to gloating every week OLTL beats GH. I hope OLTL gets a decent ending. If you look at the thread about Strasser leaving you can see that. Whenever I see somebody mentions that the end might be all about the Fords even I shake my head at the thought. You may not blame AMC but you can see that plenty of people do. They blame AMC, GH, Oprah... If OLTL was supposed to be the first to go, at least the show got four extra months but somehow, through some truly twisted logic, instead of being grateful for that, those four months translate into "AMC killed OLTL."

There's no point to the fapping away at the ratings anymore because it's very clear that (say it with me) ABC wants out of the soap business. It was one thing when the cancellations were first announced because we didn't know any better but now its obvious. Bumping Broderick up to HW on AMC, bumping Wolf up to HW on GH, moving RC to GH to run out his contract, the news about Couric, it's like shutting down a factory division by division. And yet every week we've got people claiming, "they canceled the wrong show."

They canceled all the shows.

(You're one of my favorites too BTW.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see where people are getting ratings are stabilized for any show. When I look at the demos which appears to be the only number that the industry cares about, they are still dropping. What's stablized for some of the shows are the viewing numbers which means the older viewers are coming back to perhaps see their show's last hurrah so to speak. Isn't that the same thing that happened with ATWT also?

As for this endless discussion about which show goes or should go first or why cancellations happened, I honestly have no clue why ABC moved AMC to LA. We all know now from Brian Fron's statements that the development of replacement programming has been going on for at least a year likely longer so this idea that moving AMC to LA was going to improve the show to the point where its ratings would improve(why would a move to LA impact this) to me seems like reaching for some logic that doen't exist. There was no saving this show to the point where it was going to last several more years. But the fact is what was stated was true. ABC wants out of soaps. The only debate is order in which the shows are going. And whats the point in debating this. There are a myriad of reasons none of us will never know and not one I'll bet has to do with OLTL being some sort of red headed stepchild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh my god that is RIGHT!!! The two year contracts for Carlivati and Valentini- I never thought of that- they will both be helming GH, without a doubt.

Well I know the Fords will be gone by September. A certain hated insider has proven herself correct on 6 dismissals so far- 2-3 months before they were announced. I really don't care that people hate her. She has proven herself in my eyes. That is why I am not concerned about the Fords at all. I am wondering what the endgame for OLTL really is, as things are pretty quiet on that front. I think July/August will be the beginning of OLTL's final stage and things will become more apparent. I cannot believe that AMC stops filming in July. I really cannot believe how fast this is happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's one example, and the one that I was responding to.

This meme has been going on every since OLTL was canceled, despite the fact that over the past nine months GH's numbers are better, but the numbers for both (all) of the shows are horrible, and good reason for the cancellations.

As far as OLTL's demo numbers being so much better than AMC's, I don't like using that phrase to describe a difference of two tenths of a point, or raw numbers that are never more than 300,000 viewers apart. Most statisticians, network executives and advertisers wouldn't see a significant difference at all here, because there isn't one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It seems like the obvious downside for future writers was that if a real news event occurred in Bay City, Michigan, then the audience would wonder how it would affect Rachel and Iris. Whereas, a soap set in a larger city like Los Angeles or Houston can avoid everything but weather events by saying that our characters were on the other side of town.  IRL, I recall a huge snowstorm that hit Manhattan in the 1990s, and the papers with filled with stories about actors and crew having to spend the night in various television studios because the trains shut down early.  Which led me to question if we know of any natural events like storms or tornados that effected production? Remember when Port Charles, NY had to have an earthquake because of sets destroyed by a real earthquake in LA?
    • @janea4old I'm sure eventually Canada/USA will air the same episode, but I'm really surprised it has gone on this long.
    • To her credit, I don't think Lucci ever demanded that she be front and center the way other lead actresses did. If she did, she wasn't listened to. She also had other side projects and that probably helped out a lot. When Erica was maternal Erica, she added to the show. As time wore on and they were still writing her as if she still in her twenties, it didn't work and it harmed the show. I know Lucci wanted to do the showgirl storyline which was a mess. I've also read (don't know how reliable it is) that a lot of her bad decisions came from her husband's advice. That included her ridiculous choices for Emmy submissions and the terrible t.v. movies. There have been a lot of talented daytime actresses who didn't get their due, and it is rather annoying that Lucci was nominated so often in years when she didn't deserve it and when her material was truly awful.
    • While we never believed that and never wanted that for Nikki.
    • It was! Fajitas with flour tortillas, beans, and potato salad. Butter pecan ice cream for dessert.
    • I see Nikki has got the Katherine treatment and is now referred to as a legendary business woman.
    • In the early years, both Bay City and Somerset were said to be located in Michigan, about an hour's drive from each other. In a long-ago news report about the backstage goings-on of the show, the host opened the segment by giving historical facts about AW, including Bay City, Michigan, as its locale. The clip is, or at least was at one point, available on Youtube. I watched it twice. Somerset, the spin-off sister soap, was also acknowledged to be in that same state. When Heather Lawrence was told by her mother, Eve, that they were moving there permanently, Heather complained about not wanting to go to that, "dreary little town in Michigan." On a talk show once (it might have been Merv Griffin; I forget), Audra Lindley spoke about her career pre-Three's Company. She said, "I was on a soap opera for years called Another World. It was set in Bay City, Michigan...." And then she elaborated on her antagonistic character of Liz Matthews. Finally, even Google has its say: "Yes, Somerset, a township in Huron County, Michigan, is relatively close to Bay City. It's located to the north-east of Bay City, and the drive is generally less than an hour. The two towns are linked by the Saginaw River and Lake Huron, according to a local information source." The two towns, whose names at least exist in real life, were always said on-air to be close to each other and separated by water. The opening logo of Somerset even had a visual depiction of this. Why TPTB at P&G later changed AW from Michigan to Illinois, who knows? Maybe they just made the arbitrary/pointless decision to set AW, TGL and ATWT in the same state. Maybe those in charge were just ignorant of the facts and didn't care about consistency and continuity. Remember this is a company which mandated dropping the article THE from The Guiding Light and The Edge of Night in order to "modernize" the shows and "attract a younger audience." (If anyone can explain the irrational logic of that loopy decision, let me know, LOL.) So, yes, Bay City was originally set in Michigan. There is a real Bay City in that state, just like there's a Genoa City, Wisconsin on Y&R and a real Genoa City in the real Wisconsin. Retcons and historical inaccuracies are not uncommon on soaps, alas. Out of curiosity, were you watching in the late 1960s and early 1970s? Michigan was mentioned, on-air, more than once, back then. I kept extensive scrapbooks of all my favorites soaps at the time (yes, I had no life, LOL), and I made notes of trivia like this, characters' addresses and telephone numbers, birthdates of babies, etc.
    • It just reinforces everything that's wrong with this couple and this show, doesn't it? It's not romantic, it's not sexy, it's not anything. Instead, I end up thinking about the set -- how long it took to put up even more greenery to remind us we're in the park, that the weather in WI must be really mild to produce those full-bloom roses, and how adorable that they've added tables so people can carry Panera there to eat.
    • Yeah... Joss needs to die. So sick of her. And it would be so nice if the professor did it. Btw, ruining Emma is not gonna make people like Joss. It's just gonna make us like Emma more. Luckily, I enjoyed the rest of the episode. And yes, Gio did look hot 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I was totally here for Brook Lynn vs. Lulu, even though I'm Team Brook Lynn. This confrontation definitely need to happen and I hope it's the first of many. I'm curious to see what's going to happen from here. I don't like Ric all that much, but he was kickin' ass today. Hopefully, this leads to Willow getting custody. I did feel bad for Sasha though. I'm still loving how we have to hate Boyle even though he's 100% correct  And yeah, I still don't know what they're doing with Lucky and Liz but I liked their scenes today. They're so good together, and honestly, they should become like Dante and Sam: a couple with no conflict lol I think they've earned their happily ever after.
    • For real. Can she at least go to Orphey Genes on lunch break? There's so much mess that she hasnt seen and we missed her commentary
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy