Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

If she's that shrewd I'm not sure why she would launch OWN when she didn't have time to oversee it properly, and when it has a weak lineup. I don't think she's made the best decisions when it comes to her cable channels.

(I do agree with her that there's no reason to buy the soaps - but that doesn't make me understand why she can't have ANY scripted programming).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think Oprah is crippling herself by not doing any scripted programming. It doesn't have to be OLTL or AMC, or any soap for that matter. But she needs to do at least one or two shows. And syndicate old shows too.

Why would anyone want to watch a show about the Judd's farm, in a world of Jersey Shore?

(Now I personally FLOVE the Judd's, but I know I'm the exception not the rule)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL I just cannot watch that channel! :lol: So distracting. We are talking MAJOR pay/cast/crew cuts and union contract mess here but I do wish amc and oltl could have been some sort of pioneers in the online soap revolution. Record player here but I thought that Griffin abc.com prequel was shot beautifully and with online viewing becoming what it is...

I think my Robin love is apparent but it's not a valid argument to say that Oprah is turning her back on the daytime audience that made her cuz well... people actually watch Oprah. She's not the one who was hurting. What was wrong she made it right and the soaps didn't do that for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well someone's watching it because it has gotten pretty good ratings for the network thus far

http://www.thefutoncritic.com/ratings/2011/04/20/own-oprah-winfrey-network-posts-second-consecutive-week-of-double-digit-growth-across-key-demos-in-primetime-versus-year-ago-discovery-health-numbers-4514/20110420own01/

I'm sure when Shania Twain, Celine Dion, Ryan & Tatum O'Neal's and Sarah Ferguson's shows premiere (again I don't get why these shows weren't ready when the network originally launched), the network will be in better shape, not to mention the return of Ling's "Our America" and the specials from Julia Roberts, Forrest Whitaker and Goldie Hawn

I don't think she's said never, just not right now and since she can't even get her unscripted programs together and placed properly in the lineup I think it's best she hold off on trying to tackle any scrited projects for the time being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why do you think that? Not having scripted programs is the least of her problems. Not having new or original programming at all is the major issue. For weeks people were watching the same episodes of "Ask Oprah all stars" and "What Would You Do: OWN edition." She lined up all of these shows with all of these 'big names' and yet they premiere once a month. April was The Judds, May will be Shania and so on. I don't see the sense in tackling scripted programming (which is a more time consuming process and requires a lot more money) when there are so many other issues that need to be addressed first. In all of the articles being written about OWN's issues, very few of them cite "lack of scripted programs" as a major factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think we're reading different articles.

And in a world dominated by reality television, Oprah is NOT bringing it. I know it's sad, but America is not interested in educational, or meaningful reality TV. And they're not interested in the mundane life of celebrities on a farm.

If Oprah wants reality TV to be her niche, she needs to come out with "25 Bitches, 1 House" or some sh!t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I respect Oprah for not having trashy shows, but most of the shows she does have are fronted by people who aren't exactly major draws these days, and in some cases are a huge mess (Ferguson, Tatum O'Neal). I also don't know if I've ever seen anything of Julia Roberts or Shania Twain that suggests they have any personality to front a TV show (Julia on talk shows/award shows can be tough to sit through).

It just sounds like she threw together dated names to try to fill up her channel in a hurry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I agree. I respect her for it too, but she's not going to get very far in reality TV the way she's doing it. That's why I stand by the idea that she needs scripted programming or original movies...Something.

Also, she shouldn't have launched the network until January 2012. Fresh AFTER her show ended. People would be going through Oprah withdrawl and actually be interested in tuning in to see her agin. Launching it this year, simulataneous with her daytime show, has allowed people to become bored. The network isn't big anymore. It's there. It will be there when her show ends...Just like it was a year earlier.

I think she should have waited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Julia Roberts doesn't have a show, it's a documentary on moms featuring Hilary Clinton and some other people. I don't believe she's in it, she just produced it and narrates it.

Honestly? It seems like a waste of time to debate this with those who don't have or have never seen the network. I'm not sure how this could be a real conversation of value. That's like me, having never seen an episode of AMC, trying to debate with people why it sucks because I read an article Nelson Branco wrote saying it sucks. That makes sense how? I don't get how you can give an opinion on what a network needs if you've never seen any show at all on the network. Well I guess everyone has an opinion, but it's like trying to explain all of the issues and changes that need to be made in a Ron Howard film that you've never seen before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   It's just so much fun!   She really was what made the show come together. I remember thinking what a mistake it was to write her out temporarily. I wonder how I'll feel during this rewatch, but I'm fairly certain her absence contributed to the show ending after season 5.
    • Thank you @Paul Raven The Kay/Kill stuff sounds like fire.   @soapfan770 I saw someone asking about old episodes you had... in case anyone has old tapes but not a VCR, DM me, I am willing to convert them for free.
    • I think Krista is too hot or her. I think the current actress works bc she comes across so basic. Thats not a dig but she feels very normal and relatable as an average suburban woman. I think if Krista was in the role, Id want more out of her but I dont think Jan is meant for bigger things
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • The sad thing about SC being a great actor is that his character has never worked. Ever. And yes if I don't know what Liam is about and just focus on acting... I can appreciate him. But as soon as I connect him to Liam... I cringe.  Maybe SC should run till he is still young and find himself a role where he can shine. 
    • As I've said before I don't believe the fact that both sisters have cheating husbands (one in the past, one more recently) is a coincidence or anything random. It's pre-thought and pre-planned and the message is clear. Cheaters can be found in all shapes, forms and sizes. Some do it in the most blatant way, they are known serial cheaters and their wives know of their past hook ups (as Dani has already said... she was willing to forgive Bill for his previous mistresses... till Hayley came) and some are more masterfully disguised in the image of the perfect husband. The fact that Dani was jealous of her sister Nicole's happy marriage in the first episodes was not a coincidence. I knew it the first second I heard it. It made me wonder and think what is beneath Nicole and Ted's picture perfect life. The show painted two very different sisters and then gave them the same crisis. It was intentional and dramatically focused on how these women acted after that... How they kept or did not keep their dignity. The contrasts and the similarities are not random. They connected the two stories very well. Telling us that beyond the gates there are secrets... lies and betrayals. And sometimes the happiest ones have the biggest skeletons in their closets. Is all of this a cliche? A soap opera serial cliche? Yes. Does it still work? Yes. And did we need to start with something that is more universal and easier to stomach by the mass audience? Yes. This is only the beginning of the show in terms of stories and themes. We will have years ahead of us to explore different aspects of these people. The first couple of months it had to be a classic sex and betrayal story that makes more people hooked. It's universal. Again. Nothing so far about both husbands being cheaters is coincidental for me. It's too early for that.
    • Thanks, these are great! Joanne Curtis, another soap character punished for having an abortion
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Yes!!! Mona feels  like one of my aunts, love the way she carries herself. Loved seeing Eva pop-up at the gambling place.  Monday was all around good soap. Can't remember the last time an entire episode held my interest.  Loving the fallout and reverberations from Ted and Shea-Butter Sheila's affair

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Tricia Mann Grant is 90s early 2000s quality FINE. As nice as it would've been to see Anita embrace Eva, I'm glad she didn't because we can squeeze a lot more years of conflict out of Eva, Leslie and the Duprees.   Lauren & Sheila, Viki & Dorian, Katherine & Jill all gave us good conflict for decades. Hopefully this follows suit. I understand the concern. Right now there's an issue of quality of black representation on shows more so than quantity of black shows. I'd like to see more predominantly black sci-fi, legal, political, supernatural or medical dramas over the typical who is sleeping with who. However, this is a soap, and this is what happens on soaps. White soap characters do these things all the time, but have the luxury of being seen as individuals, not representations of their entire race. Husbands/fathers like Todd Manning, Victor Newman and Asa Buchanan cheat, lie and swindle all the time but aren't seen as a commentary on white men. Black characters like Ted and New Dollar Bill should be able to do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy