Odd that one of these doesn't already exist here. Just a thread to discuss movies after you see them, whether just released in theaters or an older movie you wanted to discuss

Winter's Bone (Jennifer Lawrence, John Hawkes) - Really fantastic movie. I enjoyed this a lot more than the film it is constantly being compared to, Frozen River. Jennifer Lawrence is just as great as people claim and seems so authentic (you never feel like she's acting), but my favorite performance in the movie is John Hawkes by far. I was a big advocate for Bale winning the Oscar for The Fighter but I wouldn't have minded a Hawkes upset. I had a few minor issues with the script, but the strong performances and direction completely make up for it. I was engrossed in the film all the way through because I honestly had no idea how it would end and Lawrence's Ree was such a likable and rootable heroine.

4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 days (Anamaria Marinca, Laura Vasiliu, Vlad Ivanov) - One of the best movies I have ever seen. I don't know that a movie has ever kept me on the edge of my seat like this did and with no explosions, car chases, gun fights, or expensive special effects. There was one point in the movie that was just a little too intense for me, I had to pause and take a break because I realized I was holding my breath a little too long. Some people have complained that there's not enough exposition in the film, but I think that is one of the biggest reasons why I found it so compelling - instead of taking the sentimental approach that others would have and trying to prompt manufactured reactions, he took an incredibly raw and cerebral approach that had a much bigger emotional impact. The two leads are superb too.

What about you? Any films you've seen lately that you want to discuss or review?

When I have more energy, I'll post about the insanely overrated and campy Black Swan and how The Wrestler is such a superior film that it is astonishing.

Edited April 9, 201114 yr by Vizion

Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) - Terribly unscary. Was this even supposed to be a horror film? LoL The lead was terrible. It's a shame too, because I love Katie Cassidy, Thomas Dekker, and Kyle Gallner. Oh well.

Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) - Terribly unscary. Was this even supposed to be a horror film? LoL The lead was terrible. It's a shame too, because I love Katie Cassidy, Thomas Dekker, and Kyle Gallner. Oh well.

LOL! I heard it was terrible and that Rooney Mara was especially bad. How was Jackie Earle Haley as Freddy?

Soul Surfer....Very good. Inspirational. It was a great story and they executed it very well. The acting was great all around. Even Carrie Underwood did very well with the material. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

LOL! I heard it was terrible and that Rooney Mara was especially bad. How was Jackie Earle Haley as Freddy?

I thought he was fantastic with what he had to work with. I urge you to watch Little Children, starring JEH, Kate Winslet and Patrick Wilson. His performance as a child molester released from prison is outstanding.

Edited April 10, 201114 yr by Amello

I thought he was fantastic with what he had to work with. I urge you to watch Little Children, starring JEH, Kate Winslet and Patrick Wilson. His performance as a child molester released from prison is outstanding.

Oh I've seen Little Children. I made the mistake of reading the book first, so I had some issues with Kate Winslet's performance (and especially that gawd-awful and irritating voiceover narration), but JEH was quite good.

Oh I've seen Little Children. I made the mistake of reading the book first, so I had some issues with Kate Winslet's performance (and especially that gawd-awful and irritating voiceover narration), but JEH was quite good.

I didn't even know it was a book. What was wrong with Winslet's perfomance? Does the book differ greatly from the film?

I just watched Victor Sjöström's THE PHANTOM CARRIAGE (1921) for the first time on YouTube. For a silent and almost two hour film, the movie practically flies by before you know it. I strongly urge people to watch this classic Supernatural/semi-horror/gothic film. So awesome and the score is quite good and creepy, at least initially.

Scream 4.

It was very solid, by far better than 3 and even 2. Not as good as the original. The comedy bits were trying too hard, IMHO. Roberts is far to weak to pull of a leading role, however Hayden rocked her part to perfection. I figured out the killer in 15-20 minutes, and the motive, so i was bummed i was right in the end. It was definatly choppy and i did not like who lived and died. But again, it was solid and id give it a B

JP, I disagree about Emma Roberts. I thought she did great and had a real Neve Campbell-like style to her. I thought she was good.

But you're right, Hayden was by far the strongest of the younger-characters.

I am SERIOUSLY hoping that...

Kirby (Hayden) didn't really die. The last time we saw her, she was stabbed but still alive. They never clarified specifically that she died. I'm hoping in Scream 5 (should on be made), we will find Kirby survived the attack and the series will be rebooted with her as the primary younger character. Hayden really rocked it.

And of course they could still work Sidney, Gale and Dewey into the films if Hayden/Kirby was in the lead.

I didn't even know it was a book. What was wrong with Winslet's perfomance? Does the book differ greatly from the film?

The book doesn't differ that much from the film, but Winslet was just not how I pictured Sarah and Winslet played her rather...lifeless? I mean, in the book, Sarah had a really biting sense of humor and the underlying feeling was that she didn't understand why having children made you a boring adult. Winslet didn't really play the subtext for me, and OMG, the narration made me want to kick somebody. So incredibly irritating!

Edited April 28, 201114 yr by Vizion

Copy/pasted from the other thread, in case someone's interested:

Thor:

I went with not very high expectations but was very, very impressed ultimately. The effects were great (if not too much in certain moments) and Chris Hemsworth was not only deliciously handsome but much better in acting than I had thought (afterwards, I realized I knew him from Home & Away). What really surprised me, however, was the humor in the movie, which was unexpectedly great. There were numerous--numerous--occassions where the whole audience just burst out in hysterical bouts of laughter than drowned out at least 3-4 lines that came after. The script actually made sense but the really dramatic moments (arguments, confrontations) were often almost laughable. Almost campy. They saved it, but they came close. But, in general, a very enjoyable experience. The ending? It felt somewhat abrupt. Just the way they cut it, something was too jarring. But, the real ending? Greatness. If you go see it, make sure you sit till after the closing credits end--because that's when the cliffhanger scene occurs!

And, did I mention how incredibly hot Chris Hemsworth is?

Copy/pasted from the other thread, in case someone's interested:

Thor:

I went with not very high expectations but was very, very impressed ultimately. The effects were great (if not too much in certain moments) and Chris Hemsworth was not only deliciously handsome but much better in acting than I had thought (afterwards, I realized I knew him from Home & Away). What really surprised me, however, was the humor in the movie, which was unexpectedly great. There were numerous--numerous--occassions where the whole audience just burst out in hysterical bouts of laughter than drowned out at least 3-4 lines that came after. The script actually made sense but the really dramatic moments (arguments, confrontations) were often almost laughable. Almost campy. They saved it, but they came close. But, in general, a very enjoyable experience. The ending? It felt somewhat abrupt. Just the way they cut it, something was too jarring. But, the real ending? Greatness. If you go see it, make sure you sit till after the closing credits end--because that's when the cliffhanger scene occurs!

And, did I mention how incredibly hot Chris Hemsworth is?

So Natalie Portman didn't suck the life out of the film like almost everything she does?

I heard Thor was really enjoyable though, I might take a look. Thanks!

Edited May 11, 201114 yr by Vizion

So Natalie Portman didn't suck the life out of the film like almost everything she does?

I heard Thor was really enjoyable though, I might take a look. Thanks!

No, she wasn't too bad. It also somehow felt that she didn't have too huge of a part in the movie, despite being the love interest.

You're welcome!

The King's Speech

Everything I expected it to be, and more. Gorgeous photography and sets, a great performance by Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush, great script. Firth excelled in playing the stuttering realistically and never forgetting the pain behind it, the embarassment. Cried every few minutes or so, watching it. Such brilliance, one of the films you want to rewatch as soon as you see it.