Jump to content

AMC: The Killing


Vanguardian

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I finally saw the fourth season. Wow. What a way to end. I will echo your comments on seasons 3 and 4 being the show's best, although I still think season 3 was the top, never to be bested. The murder mystery was gripping, well-acted and interesting, although ultimately not as shattering as the serial killer arc. Nevertheless, the main point of the season was Skinner's murder, the effects it had on Holder and Linden and the resolution of the serial killer storyline and, in those aspects, was brilliant.

Absolutely. It was wonderful.

I didn't even realize they had dropped the whole red herring thing! I guess you have to be focused when you only have six episodes.

I thought recreating the scenes from the opening credits to show that it was Linden making her final decision while overlooking the lake was absolutely masterful. I also liked the fact that she went back to Holder and that it ended without specifically establishing their relationship. I always felt a little uncomfortable at the thought of the two of them hooking up, so I'm very glad we never had to actually see it. Instead, in my mind, I can picture them being best friends, being each other's lifeline, and making a home together. smile.png

I will miss this show so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's been so long since I watched this, I really can't remember why I objected to the ending, other than just because it seemed unnecessary. I loved the meandering relationship they developed over the previous episodes, and I didn't need a "happy ending". This isn't a "happy ending" kind of show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • GH on Hulu, their Top 15 list, now for the second consecutive day ... #1.
    • From PKWaddle, ex-soap journo & fan & one known only to give good intel, in a post on my FB soap group: #1 Peacock shows 10 of the past 12 weeks DAYS in their TOP 3. #2 DAYS is now more ahead, currently at 10 months & 1 week.
    • Just a little nod, Today would've been Bill Hayes 100th Birthday! He was almost the first Centenarian On A Soap
    • Kevin Kline's description of soap fans makes me laugh.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not to ramble too far off topic but it happens a lot with comics too, especially only wanting to keep cheap talent around and pushing out creative voices. There are some patches where creatives can go to start their own worlds...wish that was true with soaps, but who knows, maybe it can happen someday. I never thought we'd get a new soap this year.
    • Very true & also at least in the case of stand-out HWs, it is fraught with exhaustion & burnout.
    • Plus we are never going to have a Shonda Rhimes, a Dick Wolf, or a Chuck Lorre of daytime -- a single brilliant person who could come in and change the genre -- because Shonda, Dick, or Chuck would only be able to work on one soap opera at a time, not three or four at the same time as they do in primetime.  As long as TPTB insist on the 60-minute format, we will never have another super influential individual like Phillips, Nixon, or Bell.  They simply would never have time to do more than one soap opera at a time and that would stifle their influence overall. Thanks. So maybe this is happening to some degree in other entertainment genres.  I don't keep up with the particular franchises you mentioned, so I was unaware.  I appreciate your perspective.
    • I think it's become more common in other genres in recent decades, as the industry as a whole has collapsed - these are complaints that have been made about creative talents in the MCU, Star Wars, Doctor Who, etc.  The MCU is in that place now as they burnt so much goodwill that even when their new movie got strong reviews, the audience didn't show up - similar to how AW got some praise for their 89-93 material compared to some of the barren years beforehand, but viewers just weren't coming back.  (I know they did return, somewhat, in the JFP run, but not enough to make up for the big budget she used)
    • I mean I really hope so. Still kinda amazed though that it would get by Standards & Practices. A pair that was talked about that I could see it was Jacob Young & that guy who kept changing what name he went by Someone Martines at least part of the time, but at any rate Jacob was playing Lucky & this other guy was playing Nikolas.
    • Excellent explication. That doing it in these two examples, is not like doing it in other similar genres or franchises, so one could easily postulate that the people who hire do not generally consider "newbies" but instead insist upon experienced people, which leads to rehiring rather than hiring from "outside" which is what your closed system is all about.  When you think about it how many people can you name who did soaps who came from outside? I can only think of 3 HWs : Pete Lemay, Hogan Sheffer & Michael Malone. For EPs only 2: Wendy Riche & Linda Gottlieb    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy