Jump to content

WikiLeaks Leaks the Documents


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Frankly, if all these 'leaks' were just put out in the open, I think the whole world would feel a whole lot better about everything.

It's all the secrets and 'what if' scenarios that are frightening.

China wants to ditch North Korea and force reunification? Fabulous!

Saudi Arabia wants Iran's leadership toppled? Terrific!

Russia's run by corrupt scum? Surprise!

I say lets put some of these leaks into action, the band aid has been ripped off, let's get some plans in motion!

I'll just add that I think Hillary Clinton has handled this marvellously, the question is why hasn't Obama addressed this publicly? Pathetic. She has taken the lead, she has demonstrated incredible poise and skill. Frankly, it just reiterates what I've felt from day one: Hillary Clinton should have been president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ICAM about Hillary! And as a staunch Obama supporter I'm completely underwhelmed with his direction. He seems incapable of making a uniformed decision and moving the country forward while Hillary has demonstrated leadership. I have absolutely no idea what this guy believes in because he never takes a stand for anything. Currently he's looking so ineffective as president all his mantra of hope and change as amounted to a mud puddle. I don't think Democrats stand a chance in 2012 if Obama/Biden is the ticket.

Hillary could stand to get some work done. The jowls and sagging skin is atrocious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hillary IS a leader. Obama is a fabulous public speaker. There's such a difference in practice.

Hillary would do well with a facelift and a lower eye job. After this mess, she should take some time off, do it, declare it and then dramatically boot Obama from the 2012 ticket. Clinton/Gore (and I do mean Tipper!) 2012!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Although she has refuted the rumors, there's substantiated rumblings she will throw her hat in the ring and with a capable second tier she'll get the nomination. I'm not sure who who will be the perfect candidate; I'll have to give it some thought but it's too bad Colin Powell wants nothing to do with politics. Clinton/Powell would be intriguing.

Obama is a prolific eloquent speaker but the country needs a leader, he has proven he ain't it. Republicans are determined to make him a one term president but it's Democrats and Independents who will make that decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would never believe Hillary when it comes to running for president, of course she has to deny it...but the internal workings of the Democratic party cannot be pro-Obama 2012, for him to run again would be suicide for the Democratic party unless something truly wonderful happens to the country that can be directly tied to Obama's actions, which isn't going to happen.

Clinton/Powell would be amazing. I wouldn't ever count Colin Powell out...he is a truly great American and I think he is against what he saw in the Bush years enough to run with Hillary. I get shivers thinking about those two together. They'd get sh*t sorted out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently, not. This is the second time you are wrong about the leaks. First you found nothing really interesting about them. Yet Hillary finds them to be... Well – treason. Of some sorts. Am I right in interpreting you liking Hillary's handling of the situation excellent because of how she said it and not based on what she said? Because what she did say is the opposite of what you want, no? It would be wonderful if the world could be all rosy, but the reality defeats such wishes at every turn.

Second, the media are trashing Andrew as we speak, many are appalled that someone who is a kind of diplomat and a royal behaved in such an undiplomatic way.

But yes, it will blow over and it will have no effect on anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nah! I think Hilary would LOVE being president as it would be validation for many reasons. She has grown a lot in the last two years. As a matter of fact I think she's the only person who has been taking internal notes and simply bidding her time.

Her problem in '08 is that she underestimated Obama. She's decent in campaigning and in comparison to his eloquence, everyone came short by default. She failed because she was going up against the "change" machine. She was at her most effective when she called him out on his kumbaya policies and after two years without change, she was right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pPV1yd7sQg&feature=related

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't been "wrong" about the leaks because my comments have been my opinion, nothing I've stated has been factual.

Hillary is treating them as treason because the US government can't have people accepting these leaks as anything but treasonous, it helps distract people from knowing what's actually been said, it puts a scapegoat out there so that instead of all of us going "Wait, so the Saudis want to blow Iran off the face of the earth and we've turned them down through two administrations?" we'll watch CNN for the trial of the Wikileaker.

I think Hillary has handled it excellently both in how she's said it and what she's said. It's all very presidential and authoritative and controlled. She hasn't blinked. Now, that's not to say that I would love for the world to just get going with the truth and get some issues sorted out...but I know that's not how the political world works. Thus, Hillary's behaviour is what I really like to see in a politician. Poise, polish, authority, seriousness and very little bullsh*t.

The media will trash Andrew for a few days, then something else will happen. It'll get spun off and disappear. Andrew has nothing to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy