Jump to content

October 25-29, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

If you're going to copy/paste, please link. Thank you.

Numbers are based on Live+Same Day ratings

Ratings for the week October 25-29, 2010

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 4,878,000 (+16,000/-124,000)

2. B&B 3,108,000 (-79,000/-169,000)

3. DAYS 2,424,000 (-107,000/-535,000)

4. OLTL 2,345,000 (-9,000/-175,000)

5. GH 2,282,000 (-98,000/-446,000) <- new low (Previous low: 2,325,000 for July 6-10, 2009)

6. AMC 2,270,000 (-39,000/-452,000)

HH

1. Y&R 3.4/12 (same/-.2) <- ties low rating (2nd straight week)

2. B&B 2.2/8 (-.1/-.2)

3. OLTL 1.8/6 (+.1/-.1)

3. DAYS 1.8/6 (-.1/-.4)

5. AMC 1.7/6 (same/-.4) <- ties low rating (2nd straight week)

5. GH 1.7/5 (-.1/-.4) <- ties low rating (Last time: June 14-18, 2010)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. Y&R 1,036,000 (+25,000/-71,000)

2. GH 687,000 (-55,000/-232,000) <- new low (Previous low: 729,000 for June 14-18, 2010)

3. DAYS 670,000 (+18,000/-229,000)

4. B&B 650,000 (+18,000/-34,000)

5. OLTL 629,000 (+4,000/-98,000)

6. AMC 528,000 (-23,000/-210,000)

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.6/10 (+.1/-.1)

2. DAYS 1.0/7 (same/-.4)

2. B&B 1.0/7 (same/same)

2. GH 1.0/7 (-.1/-.4) <- new low

2. OLTL 1.0/6 (+.1/-.1)

6. AMC 0.8/5 (same/-.3) <- ties low rating (2nd straight week)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. Y&R 45,000 (same/+25,000)

2. GH 34,000 (+10,000/-9,000)

3. B&B 32,000 (-4,000/+13,000)

4. OLTL 28,000 (+9,000/+5,000)

5. DAYS 23,000 (-20,000/-7,000)

6. AMC 12,000 (+4,000/-1,000)

Women 18-34 Rating

1. Y&R 0.8/6 (same/-.4) <- ties low rating (2nd straight week)

2. DAYS 0.7/5 (same/-.3)

3. GH 0.6/4 (same/-.4) <- ties low rating (2nd straight week)

3. OLTL 0.6/4 (+.1/-.2)

5. B&B 0.5/4 (same/-.1)

5. AMC 0.5/4 (same/-.4) <- ties low rating (2nd straight week)

Men 18+ Viewers

1. Y&R 1,234,000 (+75,000/-29,000)

2. B&B 690,000 (+18,000/-47,000)

3. DAYS 547,000 (-53,000/-64,000)

4. AMC 429,000 (-34,000/-75,000)

5. GH 408,000 (-53,000/-75,000)

6. OLTL 406,000 (-33,000/-33,000)

-------------------------------------

Day-To-Day Ratings - HH/Total Viewers

AMC

Monday: 1.9/2,437,000

Tuesday: 1.7/2,342,000

Wednesday: 1.4/1,786,000 (repeat - did not count)

Thursday: 1.7/2,178,000

Friday: 1.6/2,122,000

B&B

Monday: 2.3/3,240,000

Tuesday: 2.3/3,094,000

Wednesday: 2.4/3,386,000

Thursday: 2.0/2,908,000

Friday: 2.1/2,912,000

DAYS

Monday: 1.8/2,371,000

Tuesday: 1.8/2,472,000

Wednesday: 1.8/2,522,000

Thursday: 1.7/2,323,000

Friday: 1.8/2,431,000

GH

Monday: 1.8/2,397,000

Tuesday: 1.8/2,478,000

Wednesday: 1.2/1,494,000 (repeat - did not count)

Thursday: 1.7/2,225,000

Friday: 1.5/2,027,000

OLTL

Monday: 1.9/2,451,000/

Tuesday: 1.9/2,600,000

Wednesday: 1.2/1,499,000 (repeat - did not count)

Thursday: 1.7/2,158,000

Friday: 1.6/2,127,000

Y&R

Monday: 3.7/5,221,000

Tuesday: 3.3/4,589,000

Wednesday: 3.5/5,081,000

Thursday: 3.4/4,899,000

Friday: 3.3/4,600,000

----------------------

For the SEASON September 20, 2010 through October 31, 2010

HH

1. Y&R 3.6

2. B&B 2.3

3. GH 1.9

3. DAYS 1.9

5. AMC 1.8

5. OLTL 1.8

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.7

2. GH 1.3

3. DAYS 1.1

3. OLTL 1.1

5. B&B 1.0

6. AMC 0.9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Info on OLTL rating demos

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/11/04/the-talk-up-20-in-women-18-34-over-premiere-week/70849

via press release:

“THE TALK” POSTS GAINS WITH YOUNG WOMEN

“The Talk” Up +20% in Women 18-34 Over Premiere Week

“The Talk” Also Improves the Year Ago Time Period by +20% in Women 18-34

“The Talk” Matches “One Life to Live” in Women 18-34 for the Second Consecutive Week

THE TALK, CBS’s new daytime talk show, increased by +20% among women 18-34 over premiere week and the year ago time period, according to Nielsen live plus same day ratings for the week ending Oct. 29.

THE TALK delivered a 1.5/05 with 2.08m viewers, 1.0/06 in women 25-54, 0.8/05 in women 18-49 and 0.6/04 in women 18-34. Compared to its premiere week, THE TALK was up +20% in women 18-34 (from 0.5/04) and even in both women 25-54 and women 18-49.

Compared to “As the World Turns” during the same week last year, THE TALK was up +20% in women 18-34 (from 0.5/03). THE TALK also tied the veteran time period winner “One Life to Live” in women 18-3 for the second consecutive week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

his prediction and probably didn't see The Talk's ratings. He did get the 0.8 right for 18-49 rating.

Toups or anyone else!!~

can anyone get a hold of the ratings for "THE VIEW", I cannot find them anywhere and would like to see their

ratings VS. "The Talk" and the other soaps . Any info is appreciated!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So THE TALK fell to 1.5? Last week they were 1.6.

"Nationally, THE TALK delivered a 1.6/06 with 2.14m viewers, 1.0/07 in women 25-54, 0.8/05 in women 18-49 and 0.5/04 in women 18-34. Notable for a freshman series in its first week, THE TALK tied veteran time period winner “One Life to Live” among women 18-34."

Be interesting to see how OLTL stacked up against them last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get it. CBS' strategy here is not what people think it is. I see everyone comparing them to The View and while they are both talk shows (and I am sure at some point CBS wants The Talk to be as popular)they operate at different times. It's clear that for now they are competing against OLTL....you know the "VETERAN TIME PERIOD WINNER" in that slot. :lol: And also trying to either beat or stay in range of ATWT demos, preferably to beat.

And they are trying to do it from all angles, one bit at a time - sure they want to do better but they probably realise that they do have their work cut out for them as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Talk falls in both HHs and Total Viewers...and CBS tries to spin it in a good way. with its crappy 18-34 category. Of course it will continue to run since it is cheap but the ratings will continue to drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If that's what they're doing it's a dumb strategy, IMO. Wow, they tied a declining show which many people have never heard of, and they barely have higher demos than a soap they replaced.

It just seems kind of silly to me, and small time. I doubt anyone in the industry cares if they tied OLTL, and being so proud of demos only about 20% above ATWT when it was at some of its lowest ratings, after over 5 decades on the air, this when The Talk is still early and still has some buzz -- odd to brag about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you only had a clue as to how much MONEY they are saving i.e. no licensing fees (COST CUTS are a big deal now)....and how great that looks to investors & analysts who were so happy with their earnings call today. While we the fans are very sentimental about our shows and want them to stay on for as long as they can, for the company in these times, it is all about the bottom line and how investors can reap the benefit, not to mention their own employees. Plus the upside to all this is that this show is "pure profit" for the company not any one else. No intelligent CFO or advisor is not going to point out my last sentence to LM but he already knows it and that's why his blase comments about ATWT going off the air did not come as a surprise.

If Y&R and B&B can't produce a product that CBS will continued to be enamored with and still consider them "special soaps", we have a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria's attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
    • Thanks for finding that. I may have been thinking of this blog entry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy