Jump to content

October 4-8, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Teeny bit? I'm a sci-fi buff that accepted mythology evolves but CC just chewed his up and spit it out. Anyhoo, the best serialized primetime show hands down was IMO Babylon 5.

Soaps do need more diversity. They need to retire baby switches and drawn out who's the daddy and other overdone, cliched plots

I enjoy Natalie's CSI work because at least there's some attempt to keep up to date. Hated the MyFace stuff mostly b/c it reduced Dorian into such a juvenvile. That story was better used for Ford & Langston.

Soaps, most of all, need to get back to generational storytelling. Isolating the teens from parents and grandparents is a mistake. Bo/Matt/Clint holds great promise if RC continues to explore the Buke family history and dynamics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Nostalgia for what was gets on my nerves: My mother misses 'good shows' like Little House and the Waltons; my Grandmother longs for the good old days when programs were more modest and less sexual--we all have a habit of over-sentimenalizing the past and it may have more to do with what was actually going on with us than the television shows. I'll agree that budgets are lower thus less sets and few extrs; however, basic story stuctures remain intact, albeit, the shows move at a quicker pace. I think the main problem may be that many shows are doing, recycling, the same stories told in 1980. Also, not everything from the 'good 'ol days' was so good--Danny and Lauren singing was annoying and no better than today's rock star Noah. The Nikki/Victor story was just as sexist then as it is today. Today, I'd argue that remaining vets get far more air time than in the youth-obsessed 1980's and certainly today's ATWT gave more airtime to older characters than did Marland's era with the show when no one near Liz Hubbard's age had so much air time. The same goes for B&B where older vets remain on front burner; in addition, OLTL shunned characters the age of Vikki and Dorian back in the day but uses these characters effectivly today. GH is the only show on air today that chose to basically elimate an entire cast but maybe this was a wise move considering the shows current rank as ABC's top soap.

The genre has failed to evolve yet still maintains a niche following and produces a profit. Personally, when ratings first began to decline it in the 1990's, I think it would have been wise to cancel certain shows and try new more modern formats. Also, the creators of these shows would have had a vested stake much as Irma Phillips and Bill Bell did. Today, writers like JP, HS, SH, RC jump from show to show regardless of passion or talent and have no real stake in the outcome. Phillips, Bell and Dixon gave birth to thier shows and, as a result, devoted their lives to this vocation. I doubt writing for ATWT meant much to Passante given that she was accountable to Goutman and, after that, the network and, after that PGP. HS probably feel that same way at Y&R. Guza seems to be the only writer with any real freedom and maybe that is why GH ratings have been solid. A show can not be written by team or committee--this isn't how the creative process works. With all this said, I still don't think that today's soaps are bad. Yes, they could be far better but most of the shows still manage to put ut three or four good stories per year and this is why we all continue to tune in and endure the lame stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read a post waxing nostalgic about JFP's OLTL and how it was so much better than current RC/FV and I had to laugh.

I think soap fans in general DO view the past through some pretty strong rose colored glasses. Only watched ABC soaps, but I can't name a single year that AMC totally captivated me. OLTL's 93-94 were two stellar years back to back, but hardly balanced storytelling as Todd gobbled up half the show. For me, perhaps GH's 98 came closest to being the perfectly written year, IMO.

I think we soap fans need to keep it real. The past was not perfect. There were some major stinking years in the past, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eric, Thanks--I'm so over hearing about the glory days of soap and gow great things used to be. All of the 'great' writers made mistakes (Irma had a woman fall up the stairs) and the only real problem today relates to harsh budget cuts. I will say that soaps never had large amounts of money until the boom and I don't need a bunch of extras or perfect sets in order to enjoy a show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Baby switches and WTD are perfect examples of types of stories that should've been retired ages ago because the modern world makes them both less and less possible. Instead shows rely on them more than ever. Why should people tune into bad science fiction masquarading as daytime drama when they can turn to Syfy and tune into real bad science-fiction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have no issues with baby switches provided it only happens like once every five years on a particular show. In general, there are too many babies and kids on soaps these days when all the stats say women are waiting until at the least 30 to have kids. Like, you know Nick Newman will be a grandfather soon and is only in his mid-30's and by that logic he would have become a father at about age 14. I really hated the Lilly and Cane 'lets have a baby before cancer kills me' story--hogwash!

Nelson on Tvguide.ca is pimping OLTL gaining 250,000 new viewers due to Zimmer. How would he know that there are all new, as opposes to fallen away fans. I'm the first one to say that out of any soap, OLTL, has the greatest room for growth but Nelson is way too excited. Last week, repeats of Y&R probably hurt OLTL and, for a few weeks, many people--even those who deny it--will check out The Talk. I expect OLTL to grow over the next six months but there are going to be many ups and downs. I think the addition of TC will probably bring some buzz. Got a feeling she will be paired with Todd rather quickly and become a pathetic 'super couple'. Nelson wrote a rather long essay on ATWT and about how the ratings did not justify cancellation. Made a remark that ATWT did better than 'many primetime shows'. Aside from CW and My networks, there aren't many shows that rate 1.7 (.9) demos. ATWT was my show but Nelson seems, once again, to be going too far.

BTW, is OLTL up against Days in many markets? I really could see ATWT fans watching Days, even older viewers with Maggie and Victor getting so much air time. Days, like ATWT, is ol' school even with the many teen characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WOAH! what a surprise here. The View’s ratings are already pretty high but I really didn’t think that OLTL had a chance of beating The Talk and it really wasn’t that close.

OLTL has been on fire lately quality wise and people love bragging about how good it is so that’s a really good sign right now that OLTL may have some room to grow here in the coming months.

I did sample The Talk for about 10 minutes yesterday and quickly turned the channel it was a horrible rip-off of The View and Leah Remini was not used as well as I hoped they used her b/c I know she knows how to stir it up in a rant or a debate.

I hope DAYS did well also although it wasn’t mentioned here. DAYS usually gets close to the ratings for their Monday shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
    • LOL!! That's funny.  I actually thought he got a little better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy