Jump to content

The Munsters Remake


lovely_m

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Why does everything have to be remade? Why? And wouldn't the whole mess with Heroes, where he left for a flop show and then returned and left again almost immediately, make them wonder whether he should get another show so fast?

Can't we ever be more obscure and remake something like December Bride or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It seems like the shows that have a premise which can be remade are those which often aren't.

(cue some person in the media telling us that Desperate Housewives is the new Peyton Place)

I wouldn't say he was the reason. The reason was Tim Kring. But his return and very quick departure doesn't suggest a lot of stamina for running a show which isn't smooth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This has to be better than that version with Lee Meriweather and John Schuck, but I think the appeal of the Munsters is they just had the right cast. It isn't a genius show but is is entertaining and who can they possibly get to fill Fred Gwynne, Al Lewis and Yvonne DeCarlo's shoes? They just don't make these type of character actors anymore. And I have no idea what Modern Family is, but True Blood is not a comedy. Is MF?

Anyway, no remake will ever erase the originals, so let Yvonne say it best when she is still in reruns somewhere or online, and this remake is completely forgotten

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, MF is one of the more popular sitcoms on the air now. It won the comedy series Emmy last month.

I hope they can recognize the clear and fundamental difference between The Munsters and The Addams Family: the Addamses were fully aware of the fact that they were different and reveled in it; the Munsters had no clue and were confused when people reacted to them so strangely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"So, um, once you’ve picked your jaw up off the floor, let’s see the synonyms for 'amazing' you come up with to describe the very notion of this show below."

So, um, NO, stfu, are you serious? Create a new show exploring these themes if you must, but leave The Munsters alone. The Munsters Today was torture enough ("♫We went to sleep many years ago, and we woke up with a brand new show!♫" :rolleyes: [not that I didn't watch it every Saturday afternoon :ph34r: ]).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I believe Cecile was intentionally used for comedic elements maybe twice. I mean, start with her being royalty from where? Tanquir!!! LOL From the first moment it's a gag, isn't it? And, her kidnapping Cass? I mean does a serious character do that? Well, literally, if you go another way & it's horror, sure. And, what you describe, a food fight, yeah, it's going to be played for laughs.
    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’ training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Joey and Vanessa's scenes are boring. Get Vanessa away from him. Anita and Eva scene was great too! Lots of good scenes in today's episode.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy