Members Mitch64 Posted February 2 Members Share Posted February 2 They had given that storyline to Nick...who knew what a scum Steve was..but they made Nick so obnoxious and overbearing to prop Steve up as the misunderstood hero, that it didn't work. Which leads me to a question, when did soaps stop writing multifaceted characters who had good and bad qualities, and started gearing the writing towards characters who they wanted to, or had become fan favorites. Lisa as a bad girl had motivation and people like Ellen and Penny rightfully were not loving her, and it was okay and more realistic. Steve could have been trying to change but still had bad qualities and Nick and Kim could have rightfully been wary of him, without slanting the writing so much! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chris B Posted February 2 Members Share Posted February 2 It always annoyed me that Jade was created as Rose's daughter when she could've easily been Andy and Denise's daughter and helped revamp the Hughes family. I feel like so much of those later years was focused on the Snyder family and they didn't need another addition. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted February 2 Members Share Posted February 2 Irna created Kim as a fiercely independent woman and having a child didn't fit that profile. Her sister Jennifer had 2 children and was seen as the more traditional woman. Interesting that later on Jennifer resisted having another child. I could see the reasoning however. Like many women she felt that she had done the mom thing and now with her children grown she wanted to devote time to herself and her interests/ambitions. The Dan debacle began in 1966 when 8 year old down was suddenly early 20's played by an older actor. The Dobsons and subsequent writers kept making the mistake of not balancing and replenishing the core and favoring too many new characters. Let's not even mention killing off Chuckie Shea. Years of story thrown away in a few weeks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Reverend Ruthledge Posted February 2 Members Share Posted February 2 I, for one, don't have a problem with killing off certain characters as a lot of fans do. However, killing off Chuckie Shea was just weird and meaningless to me as his death was very sudden, random and there was no storyline that came out of it. I never saw the purpose story-wise. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SoapDope Posted February 2 Members Share Posted February 2 Killing off Chuckie Shea was a huge blunder. I can picture him being written as bit of a charming bad ass compared to upstanding Tom. I can picture a Gregory Harrison/Richard Shoberg type playing him. Or maybe Michael Gross (when he had the beard) after Family Ties ended. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 (edited) By that time Valerie was moving out of Oakdale, so I don't think we got to see what the story might have been, but, going on my memories of watching a decade ago, I liked the story. It was smaller, quieter, more character-based, and well-acted. And I agree that Kate, like Suzanne Davidson, felt "real," which is something that (aside from Lily) would be something ATWT started moving away from in the '80s and onward (they seemed to start again in the show's last few years, with characters like Parker, but by then it didn't matter). I love watching Judith McConnell but I am not sure we'll ever see the strongest material she had as Valerie - if she had any. It seems like someone at ABC and P&G decided to just hire some actors recently fired from GH and hope for the best. At least I can finally say I've seen Martin West as Don, with that enthralling dinner party clip just uploaded. Honestly, he's much more Boy Scout-esque than I had expected considering his years playing wicked Phil Brewer. This does fit the Hughes family, in some ways. Conrad Fowkes plays the character as a little darker, if still dull. After seeing that clip, I'm all the more disappointed Robert Altman likely never saw soaps. Barbar Rodell would have absolutely killed in one of his films. Or an Alan Rudolph film. Please register in order to view this content Edited February 3 by DRW50 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Planet Soap Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 (edited) "NEW" Vintage uploads: EDIT... Looks like I was already beaten to share these, lol! Please register in order to view this content Edited February 3 by Planet Soap 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 I wouldn't be surprised if they just wanted Lisa to be child-free and didn't want to age him given that Tom had already been aged by that point. He's what they tried to make Scott. I didn't mind Scott but they should have just brought Chuckie back from the dead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Maxim Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 Literally just watched this scene a couple of minutes ago. When it ended... I was borderline screaming wanting to see more. AH. But I'm still so grateful of these glimpses of classic soaps. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 (edited) I wouldn't even say the Dobsons moved away from the Stewarts - they used them all, even the one I might have punted for a while (Annie). They did not use the Hughes family well at all. I don't think that was down to the family being too old, because they could still heavily contribute to story, other than Chris. They could also have done more with Don and Joyce. Joyce was a spark plug and her being written out makes no sense to me. I think they just didn't get the Hughes family. I am not sure why they struggled so much with Bob, as they did a decent job with Ed Bauer. A part of me wonders if they may have blanched at the family because Bridget Dobson had an extremely difficult relationship with her parents, who, from some of her descriptions, remind me a bit of Nancy. Helen Wagner also suffered no fools. Nothing against John Colenback, but I think they should not have brought him back when John Reilly left. Reilly was a popular leading man and seemed to be seen as a sex symbol too - he feels much older by this point, only a few years later. Edited February 3 by DRW50 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 (edited) I think Douglas Marland wanted to bring back Chuckie, but as Eileen Fulton has famously said, "Nancy Hughes buried Chuckie - and when Nancy Hughes buries someone, they STAY buried!". I didn't realize until earlier this afternoon that the young lady who played Kate also played the heroine in the 1984 slasher film, "Scream for Help," co-starring none other than Marie Masters as her cuckolded mother, lol! Please register in order to view this content Edited February 3 by Khan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 I think I remember seeing some of that. It probably could have been exciting but not with Mary living. Mary waking long enough to confess the truth and then dying might have worked. I have vague memories of Mary being styled like Heidi in this period. And wearing pancake makeup. Who am I to argue with Eileen! I suppose it wouldn't have made a difference whether Chuckie or Scott was there. The show was heading to a place where neither were going to work. The mistake was killing him off in the first place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Franko Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 My eyes might be deceiving me, but in the screengrab, Barbara looks a little like Lesley Ann Warren (who did a couple Rudolph movies). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 I think I misworded what I meant re: the Dobsons and the Stewarts, and it really wasn't the Dobsons' doing. Killing off Dan accomplished what I was really thinking about - moving on from when "the Stewarts" meant leading men Paul and Dan (though Paul had been gone for a while) and into "the Stewarts" being a family dominated by younger women. In a way, that probably saved the family and certainly stopped poor Ellen from having to be a 70-year-old woman by the time Pat Bruder was turning 50. Funny thing is, Colenback was actually younger than John Reilly. It probably would have been tough to de-age Dan after such memorable storylines with Kim and Susan. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members VelekaCarruthers Posted February 3 Members Share Posted February 3 With all these wonderful new clips and episodes, I've been diving into ATWT history, particularly the writers. I'm fascinated by the 18 moth period between Jan 72 and July 73 when Irna returned and executed several wacky storylines and created one of the best characters ever, Kim Reynolds. Irna wrote the show with David Lesan. David had a long history with Irna and he along with Julian Funt were SFT head writers after the Hursleys. I just came across Lesan's papers that were donated to Uof Wyoming. The list is fascinating. Many letters between him and Irna, Orin Tovrov (creator of The Doctors) and a list of 18 months of scripts/outlines of ATWT. I guess he wrote the dialog and Irna wrote the outlines. I'd love to get my hands on his story notes from April 73 before they were fired. Wow, there's so much out there from the glory days of soaps. https://www.uwyo.edu/ahc/_files/pdffa/06148.pdf 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.