Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

Featured Replies

  • Member

Won't be in 3D.

I think that I was glad that it wasn't in 3D, there were a couple of parts that really made me jump.

Loved the movie and can't wait for part 2.

Now just trying to remember what the 7 Horcruxes are/were

1. Tom Riddles Diary

2. The Ring

3. The Locket

4. Ravenclaws cup

5. Harry

6. Nargi

7. ?????

  • Replies 41
  • Views 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

I think that I was glad that it wasn't in 3D, there were a couple of parts that really made me jump.

Loved the movie and can't wait for part 2.

Now just trying to remember what the 7 Horcruxes are/were

1. Tom Riddles Diary

2. The Ring

3. The Locket

4. Ravenclaws cup

5. Harry

6. Nargi

7. ?????

Tell me about it! I was in shock and I've read the books! :lol:

It's Nagini, Ravenclaw's Diadem and Hufflepuff's Cup.

Edited by YRBB

  • Member

Loved Love LOVED this movie!!!!!

Best of the 7 farr. I was really worried about where they were cutting off the film, but it turned out perfectly.

It was so weired, there were a bunch of little details I just COULDN'T remember...Which is surprising because I have a really good memory, AND I read the book twice. Therefore, I am currently reading it again.

I'm glad i didn't re-read the book before the movie though, because I would have been fresh and frustrated at some stuff they cut. Like there was this whole GREAT scene between Harry, Rob's aunt Muriel, and Dumbledore's BFF Elphius Doge, that they cut...And I completely forgot about it until rereading it today.

Anyway, great movie.

  • Member

I'm not sure if it's my fave part but I absolutely loved it. Some people have issues with it not being in the book but I don't think it makes much of a difference because it fits in perfectly.

Will be watching for a third time Friday :lol:

It really did fit, and it added a much needed heartwarming moment to a very depressing time.

  • Member

Tell me about it! I was in shock and I've read the books! :lol:

It's Nagini, Ravenclaw's Diadem and Hufflepuff's Cup.

Thanks for that, I knew that I didn't spell the snake's name right.

I do think that out of the 7 that this was my favourite one.

I think that I will go and see it again in a couple of week's as I have a Bon Jovi concert coming up as well.

  • Author
  • Member
Novelist J. K. Rowling could be in line to win an Oscar.

For the first time, the author – worth an estimated £800 million – has been credited as producer on the latest film adaptation of her Harry Potter series of books.

This means she could walk down the red carpet to collect an Oscar for Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 1, should the film win the Best Picture category.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1333742/Harry-Potter-And-The-Deathly-Hallows-film-conjure-Oscar-JK-Rowling.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Author
  • Member

<span style="font-size:10.5pt;">This is one sh!t movie! Horrendous and soooo overpraised, it's beyond belief!

Let us examine some evidence:</span>

<span style="font-size:120%;">

Potter stumbles at the finish line with tepid Hallows.

This stagnating set-up for a finale wallows in self-seriousness. There's so much glumness and lethargy here, a new character--call him Excelsior Lugubrious--emerges from the mega-budget, moody mist, threatening to slay Death himself with Sleep.

A stop gap, not a movie.

Has too many plot threads to follow in its willy-nilly efforts to set the stage for the real ending.

The plot is one long, boring slog to nowhere. Yes, that reflects what is in this section of the book, but that is absolutely no excuse for this.
</span>

<span style="font-size:10.5pt;">I don't know where to start. Alan Rickman and Imelda Staunton are as fabulous as always, Helena Bonham Carter is kind of boringly freaky, the effects are fabulous, but everything else is pure shitola: from the horrendous script with atrocious dialogue, total absence of any story, multiple stops and diversions in the middle of the film that go nowhere, complications so easily resolved and kind od fast, the dreadful, annoying Emma Watson, so sweet and coy, it's yucky. Utter crapolafest.

Ben Hibon's Tale of the Three Brothers was awesome, though as usual Rowling can't write a story worth sh!t.</span>

Edited by Sylph

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Member

Oh, Sylphy......

This is one sh!t movie! Horrendous and soooo overpraised, it's beyond belief!

Let us examine some evidence:

LOL! Since when is opinion evidence?

Is this all part of the same review, I wonder?

I don't know where to start. Alan Rickman and Imelda Staunton are as fabulous as always,

Yes

Helena Bonham Carter is kind of boringly freaky,

OK

the effects are fabulous,

Yes

but everything else is pure shitola: from the horrendous script with atrocious dialogue,

Say what?

total absence of any story,

Hardly

multiple stops and diversions in the middle of the film that go nowhere,

You mean, the quiet, character moments?

complications so easily resolved and kind od fast,

Which ones?! I'm curious!

the dreadful, annoying Emma Watson, so sweet and coy, it's yucky.

I actually was immensely impressed with her with this movie and finally saw what she has been doing from the beginning. Very subtle, very real. I can see why she would be misinterpreted as bad, though.

Utter crapolafest.

Like I've said before, you never cease to amaze me!

Ben Hibon's Tale of the Three Brothers was awesome,

It sure was

though as usual Rowling can't write a story worth sh!t.

LOL! I do hope you've read the books.

  • Member
the dreadful, annoying Emma Watson, so sweet and coy, it's yucky.

I actually was immensely impressed with her with this movie and finally saw what she has been doing from the beginning. Very subtle, very real. I can see why she would be misinterpreted as bad, though.

I found Emma fascinating to watch. I would actually say she was the best part of the movie. She brought so much depth to her role.

The worst part on the other hand was watching that kid who plays Ron. Man, he is awful.

  • 2 months later...
  • Member

Footage from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 will air during ABC Family's Harry Potter Weekend thingy starting Thursday at 7.30.

Also, the HPATDHPart 1 DVD will include one of the opening scenes of the second movie.

All great, but a trailer would be nice! :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.