Jump to content

An Open Letter from Ken Corday to Marlena De Lacroix


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Good point. I doubt you'd have an audience anymore that would dress up for a character's wedding. That's partly due too to modern audiences being more "sophisticated" (I'm sure the days of someone attacking Fulton cuz of her character are pretty much gone), although the fact that shows like True Blood still tap into that spirit audiences crave, says something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The spirit of obsessive fandom. The way it sounds like many 60s soap fans were--where it's almost as important as their real life. True Blood and many other shows, just not daytime soaps much anymore.

(I know you dislike Alan Ball, Sylph, but surely you can agree with that statement?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In fact, no, it would not be a gramatically proper acronym. But acronyms are sometimes subjective, and people take liberty with them.

Whether someone says "SOW" or "SPW," we generally know what they're talking about. It's not that big a deal to me, one way or the other. (Not something I'd care to debate - the soaps haven't become THAT boring yet... have they? happy.gif )

I was just explaining why they didn't consciously use SOW. The mag's original publisher may have even been involved with that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fact that True Blood more than doubled its audience in season 2 says nothing? -_- Or that Six Feet Under gained viewers in Season 4? :huh:

At any point, I just meant that primetime can still get people to become absorbed in the drama and characters in a way daytime no longer seems able, for a myriad of reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It always was their official abbreviation. I was never sure if it stood for "Soa Popera Weekly" or "Soapo Pera Weekly." I've always called it SOW, though.

It was SOW's Mimi Torchin who made spoilers mandatory in our little corner of the television universe, and I blame those for killing soap opera. SOD always used teasers to make you want to watch next week, or the week after (it was bi-weekly). When SOW came into being, spoilers were a way to get readers to buy SOW instead of the more sedate SOD, by telling them exactly what was going to happen next week. And they only got worse over time, moving onto the cover in 72 point (at least) type.

Mimi and her spoilers spoiled the soaps for me, permanently. I haven't been a serious watcher since AW ended in 1999. I gave up ATWT after Marland died, went back to it, and quit it again when Carly came to town.

Then I tried OLTL. The week before Easter in either 2000 or 2001, the issue of SOW that was on the racks at the grocery store gave up some essential plot point about a train wreck involving Bo and Nora and Will Rappaport as they were taking Will to Statesville Prison. It happened to be the same week the Elian Gonzalez story was coming to a head. I knew what was going to happen on OLTL, so I tuned in Fox News and CNN to see the latest Elian developments. I like not knowing.

I never watched OLTL again except for a peek at the gay characters.

I know some people actually like spoilers, and I'm not seeking to pick that fight again. You win. But it was the end of the thing for me. I'd been watching AW and ATWT from 1988 and 1989, and I had a mostly good run with those shows. I didn't watch anything for about five years after the Elian/OLTL weekend, and then started up with Y&R in 2005 or so. I never liked those people, but Kevin and Gloria made it mostly watchable. I didn't mind LML, either. But this latest bogosity made me give up entirely some months back. Especially with spoilers, there's no reason in heaven or earth to watch this show.

I watched Luke and Noah on ATWT at first, but realized CBS or P&G wasn't up to the task of presenting an authentic gay relationship on that first, kissless, New Years Eve, and gave up on soaps again. I picked World Turns up again when Reid came to town. How sad they couldn't have done this story 20 years ago, when soaps were better written. OTOH, it may be that whoever's in charge of things there now just doesn't give a [!@#$%^&*] about the Religious Wrong, and that's the only reason we're getting this very decent storyline. And there's not a whole lot of "what happens next?" tension, so I just watch my boys. [!@#$%^&*] the rest of the show. It died circa 1995.

But once ATWT's done, then I'm done. No more soaps. And I blame Mimi Torchin and her spoilers for setting the stage of my discontent. When a parasite like a soap magazine takes "what happened next?" away from the creator of the thing it purports to love, support, and promote, something is very, very wrong. It destroys what it nominally supports. And it's been that way for a good long time. For this reason, if for no other, the thing deserves to die.

I'm glad I got to see a gay love triangle on a daytime drama. I had hoped it would star Steven Frame on AW, but Luke Snyder is really the next best thing. And that's all there is.

Bravo and adios, daytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy