Jump to content

Y&R: Week of March 1 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Actually, I think Patty and Emily need to be killed off. Barring that, of course, I'd like to see Andrea Evans or Lilibet Stern show up unexpectedly and reveal "Patty" to be someone who stole her identity years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

B&B doesn't "have" Andrea, lol.

I want Andrea on as Tawny. They have it all set up for her return: Tawny has Little Deacon. Once Amber finds one, she'll find the other.

Last summer or fall, they showed Paul looking at a picture of Lilibet Stern's Patty. So to have Andrea return as Patty AFTER this Patty/Emily debacle would be way too much.

Better to bring her on as a separate character (Tawny) and just assume that Andrea's Patty was supposed to be Lilibet's. Amber needs her mother on the show, and we need Tawny to turn out to be Katherine's real daughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I argued for that a long time ago, when Amber was helping write Kay's memoirs. To me, the scenario (that Amber was/is her granddaughter) just made sense, given their immediate connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What AW stories do you think of as DOOLish? I mean AW, in a very positive way was KNOWN for its comedic elements. From Iris's maid, Vivian, to the naming of plants, to highjinks with Cass, Felicia, Wally & even Lily, plus remember Dee Evans & Tony the Tuna? In a way at one time DAYS had similar with Caliope & Eugene. 
    • Were those reasons to do with having younger children on set? Other shows seem to manage. The ageing up of the kids has been one of the mistakes the show has made.
    • I agree.  Lemay was supposed to start in early 88 and we saw some of the writing on the wall with character reference from the past.  Notably, the core families Frames, Cory, Matthews.  The stupid Reginald Love was wrapped up.  Not even a year later Mary was written out of the show along with Vince and the McKinnons who came and left .  The previous writers tried to introduce a new family that never aspired with the viewers.  1988 was focused on the 25th anniversary of show in 1989 and suspect why Lemay was asked to come back in 88.  Prior to 1988, the storylines were so DOOL stupid.
    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Assuming that Marland had been allowed to write the Carrie story the way he'd envisioned, Millette would've been involved in the story. And she might've played a role in Andy Norris' return (if the speculation on that had ever materialized, and Marland loved bringing back bad boys) But he doesn't seem interested in Sara's personal life. And the women of Springfield could only be analyzed so much.
    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy